User talk:Opole.pl

Re
Debno is in former Brandenburg, but close to Pomerania. The authorities shifted the administrative borders around so you won't find the historical regions on the map (in East Germany, they did the same). You are right about the soil, Brandenburgian soil is famous for its bad quality and in Germany commonly known as "Streusandbüchse", which is an idiom you can roughly translate as "a tin filled with very fine sand". Maybe you find a proper Polish translation on the web. But I heard rumors that you can actually grow something on that soil anyway besides pine trees and heath. Skäpperöd (talk) 13:50, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi
I appreciate your effort to pursue NPOV on Wikipedia and if you need assistance in translation or gathering of sources feel free to ask me.

Best regards, --Molobo (talk) 15:23, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

IP 77.253...
To jesteś ty? Proszę o przyznanie się, jeśli się przyznasz że to ty edytujesz jako IP 77.253... to gotowy jestem wybaczyć, jeśli nie przyznasz się to muszę skierować te IP do checkusera aby oficjalnie sprawdził te IP i długoterminowo zablokował zarówno IP jak i użytkownika. Pozdrawiam. LUCPOL (talk) 22:30, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

The source you are seeking
Is "Dorota Borowicz Mapy Narodowościowe Górnego Śląska od połowy XIX wieku do II Wojny Światowej". Page 31 and forth describe the process of Germanisation of Silesia till XX century.--Molobo (talk) 19:44, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Silesian Piasts
I've done some copyediting as you asked. Pozdrowienia,--Kotniski (talk) 11:02, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Anne of S.
Do not alter other people's talk, like you did here, changing "von" to "of".-- Matthead Discuß   22:56, 2 November 2008 (UTC)


 * It was a technical mistake I wanted to copy the whole name but, by accident, I deleted it so I've put back the name that was next to it (I thought it was the right one). You can easily trace that looking at my later edtitions on that page. You schould also talk to that guy: 71.137.198.58, not to manipulate the data (he says none and there is 92 and 56!!!). Opole.pl (talk) 07:18, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Re
From the title, your book is a compendium of Pomeranian knights (14th to 19th cts). The "Landesdirektor" was a chief bureaucrat of the provincial administrative apparatus in Prussian times. By then, "knight" was just a title, the knights were usually farmers. Regards Skäpperöd (talk) 09:56, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

WP:3RR
Please discuss, not revert. Use Talk:Silesian tribes. I am warning both parties that are warring. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 22:36, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Poland
WikiProject Poland is now dividing our members into active, semi-active (have not edited a Poland-related article in more then three months or have 10 or less edits per month on average) and inactive (have not edited at all for three months or more). You occasionally edit Poland-related articles but have few edits in the past months; we are moving you to semi-active members category. Please consider participating in our project activities again in the future, we would love to work more closely with you again! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 19:08, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Re Emigration from PL
Thank you for inviting me, but before you start I need to inform you about some technical problems with the article you might not be aware of. The article is in trouble ever since its existence. A merge was (is?) proposed, a deletion was (is?) proposed, and the most recent discussion is at Talk:Expulsion of Germans after World War II. I agree with user:Llewelyn MT that the article somehow does not properly fit into the hierarchy, and proposed the topic be covered in German minority in Poland. I agree with both Llewelyn MT and you that the article as it is now is in bad shape.

So before you (we) put any effort in improving it, I think we should start a thread at the article's talk page, invite Llewelyn MT and see who else has a look, and determine if this article should be kept or where else the information should go. Sound good? Skäpperöd (talk) 15:39, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

(PS: I saw you just moved but misspelled World War) Skäpperöd (talk) 15:39, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Question
You wrote: ''and replace them with those written by H. Weczerka. To the record - he is not known outside Germany actually and does not use the newest sources created after Silesia returned to Poland in 1945.''

Do you know more about this person? His books are often at odds with official history of Polish cities, and used on Wiki, can you tell me more about him, give some sources? --MyMoloboaccount (talk) 15:01, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Monitor. WikiProject Poland Newsletter: Issue 1 (April 2011)
Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 21:20, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 21
Hi. When you recently edited History of Silesia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anna of Austria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:36, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

History of Silesia grammar
I think it's ok. I could provide a more substantial review if you would like this article to be B-class reviewed for WP:POLAND. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 00:18, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Royal Prussia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Polish and Kingdom of Poland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Musa Dagh Resistance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Denizen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:07, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=573209624 your edit] to Polish historical regions may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:01, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * in modern Poland, also a German historical region)

Disambiguation link notification for October 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Silesian tribes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Odra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite
Hi. The WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Opolans for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Opolans is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Opolans until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Crainsaw (talk) 16:17, 18 August 2023 (UTC)