User talk:Oppa gangnam psy

WikiProject Numismatics
I've noticed that a majority of your contributions have been on currency-related articles. I think you might be interested in WikiProject Numismatics, a project dedicated to improving currency-related articles. - ZLEA  T \ C 14:25, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Oppa gangnam psy

Thank you for creating North German thaler.

User:Scope creep, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

 scope_creep Talk  18:55, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Attribution for moving text between articles
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Quarter (United States coin) into Washington quarter. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 20:55, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Banknotes of the pound sterling
Just wanted to acknowledge your more serious argument second time round. Thank you. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 16:47, 22 June 2022 (UTC)


 * His reverts to my moving of Polish marka to Polish mark and Finnish markka to Finnish mark feel like they're out of spite. Not saying they are necessarily, just what it feels like. TheCurrencyGuy (talk) 20:47, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Soviet ruble
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Haven't you learned a thing? Now you're attempting to disqualify commentors for no good reason whatsoever and are making wall of text comments that are deliberately difficult to respond to. TheCurrencyGuy (talk) 04:10, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * You got into trouble over rOuble? one letter? wow man what else can be more high risk low return than that? awaiting conclusion to your WP:SOCKPUPPETRY and maybe ur inclusion in Wiki's dumbest 100 lol Oppa gangnam psy (talk) 08:09, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Say something like that again to another editor and your block will be extended. Canterbury Tail talk 13:01, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Lighten up on the personal attacks or an administrator 'might' lockup your talkpage, for the duration of your 1-month block. GoodDay (talk) 12:58, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * @Canterbury Tail @GoodDay hi I acknowledge the ban received but hey I could still talk here! Wow lots to say
 * 1. I'm confident I'll be absolved of WP:SPI - I slept very well, thank you.
 * 2. That guy has IP addresses before securing username. Same city as meatpuppet #1 which starts with M. Curious how fast WP:SPI catches up with my intelligence.
 * 3. (I won't mince words here) if he's truly radicalised as I suspect then yea I'm freaking out & my block could be extended. WP's as bad as socmed but no 'block' buttons, no? My mental health takes precedence over WP:PG and you saw my fight-or-flight instincts. Does WP:IBAN work and can it be arranged ahead of time?
 * 4. Finally, this topic will be for next time: how WP still hasn't blown up while teeming with radicals capable of blowing the earth. I'll Google it for now but pity the WP:ANI frontliners. Thanks for your attention. Oppa gangnam psy (talk) 16:14, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Calling other editors "radicals" is exactly what you shouldn't be doing when blocked for personal attacks. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:07, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Okay I'm beginning to accept WP is not for me. Thank you Mr Editor who insisted I do WP:BRD edit edit debate discuss soak soak soak with total online strangers. All this intensive collaboration RFD etc is totally incompatible with my need to stay on-guard online. And you the admins give us the editors no recourse when we sense... radicalism. For the very existence of online danger I was out from groupchats 2010 and out of social media politics 2016 - so this must be it for WP 2022. Someday I'll finally understand the extent of online danger editors and admins are soaked in. Did I just touch a taboo topic no one wants to discuss publicly? Thanks. Oppa gangnam psy (talk) 17:36, 30 June 2022 (UTC)


 * In social media "you are what you post". In WP that's how I assess the environment. And when I see Reichsmarks galore posts then it's a window to the editor's heart. And it seems none of you think I'm entitled to my online fear so let's leave it at that and goodbye. Oppa gangnam psy (talk) 17:44, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * The administrators are here to insure that editors don't 'lose their cool' & develop a built-in filter. GoodDay (talk) 19:38, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Oz\InterAct 13:02, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 08:32, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

For continuing to make personal attacks against other editors, even once warned and serving a second block for it, you have been blocked indefinitely. It's quite clear you're not capable of editing in a collegial and collaborative fashion, and unable to accept when your behaviour is out of line. Canterbury Tail talk 18:55, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.