User talk:Opqsp2n

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peng Yee Lee has been accepted
 Peng Yee Lee, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 17:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Weizhu Bao (December 14)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timothyjosephwood was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Weizhu Bao and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Timothy Joseph Wood 15:32, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Weizhu Bao


Hello, Opqsp2n. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Weizhu Bao".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 12:55, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kim-Chuan Toh


The article Kim-Chuan Toh has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Comatmebro (talk) 04:32, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

advice
It's one of our firm reules s that articles ofn libing peoplemust have a reference that validates at least some of the basic information from the very first edit. Articles that don't have in will be deletedi n 7 days, unless someone adds it during that time.

I'm one of the volunteer administrators here, working primarily with academic biographies; most of the people you have been adding are notable, and should have articles, but it is not reasonable fory ou to expect others to do this basic work. I will help you if I can, and I may possibly have time to rescue some of your present articles. But there are hundreds of new bios each day, & your cooperation is needed.

In writing these articles, ,make sure the article contains the full sequence of degrees and positions, with dates,--normally referenced to the university web pagefor the person. In the humanities, a complete list of books published is needed, with year, date, publisher and ISBN (referenced to WorldCat); but in the sciences, the 5 most cited peer-reviewed articles, given in full with coauthors, full name of journals, and links, with the number of citations to each of them. The journal links serve as the references here. . And add any national level awards--not junior awards or awards from their own university). Refeence these if possible to a reference rom the organization giving the award.  Very sparse articles attract skepticism. as do those using vague claims and superlatives, or those that list all possible internal and external committes. Even more important, make certain none of this material is directly copied or closely paraphrased from the university website or other publication-- for an explanation, see WP:COPYVIO

Additionally, it would seem that since you are adding bios of individuals from the National University of Singapore, you are likely to be affiliated with that university. Ifso, please see WP:COI about our policy. And if, as seems quite possible, you are being paid or compensated directly ori ndirectly to write thes earticles (for example, if it is a part of your job), you must also make the full disclosure as specified at WP:PAID.

Formal warnings follows for the record. But, seriousy, if you don't follow our rules, your work will be deleted and the effort wasted.  DGG ( talk ) 08:31, 19 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your advice. I am still quite new, and have learned a minuet ago how to use talk page and to reply. I am a full time academic at the National University of Singapore (NUS), and interested in academic achievements and public record. I created articles for some NUS academics who won international awards by highly reputable international bodies, or in the case of mathematicians who were invited speakers of the International Congress of Mathematicians (ICM). I will add the basic information for these individuals as you suggested. I am not paid or compensated directly or directly to write these articles. It has nothing to do with my job. Opqsp2n (talk) 03:27, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

February 2020
You still have not responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying you may be blocked from editing.  DGG ( talk ) 08:32, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  DGG ( talk ) 08:33, 19 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello DGG, I have responded, in the section "Advice", to the enquiry regarding your suspicion that I am paid to edit. I am NOT. Like many other editors, I create and edit articles in which I have interests and expertise. I have one small question. I am aware that for contents such as awards received by an individual, we have to cite the sources to satisfy Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. But for minor items like degree information, will it be fine to just take the information, say from the homepage of the individual? Of course we should provide the homepage in external links in this case. Thanks. Opqsp2n (talk) 07:03, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Hi Opqsp2n! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Theta correspondence that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you, by the way, for your wonderful contributions to the article! — MarkH21talk 10:47, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Singapore Mathematical Society moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Singapore Mathematical Society, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 06:41, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Singapore Mathematical Society
Hello, Opqsp2n. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Singapore Mathematical Society, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:02, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Singapore Mathematical Society


Hello, Opqsp2n. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Singapore Mathematical Society".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:37, 9 March 2022 (UTC)