User talk:Oprev

Proposed deletion of Jeff Rainforth


The article Jeff Rainforth has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. red dog six (talk) 05:10, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

I would appreciate some support in the Benghazi article for including an image of the Rhodes’ email secured by Judicial Watch by lawsuit under the provisions of FOIA. I enumerated my reasons for including the imaging in “Talk” under “Judicial Watch”. Mark Miller, GabrielleF and now NorthBySouthBaranof have all deleted the image without discussion or with weak rationale, e.g., “image wastes space” & “replacing image with previous image”. Aspencork (talk) 01:51, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

January 2017
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Sally Yates, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Brad v  05:15, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

This is your only warning, Harry; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did  at Sally Yates, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Toddst1 (talk) 05:15, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Floquenbeam (talk) 13:12, 31 January 2017 (UTC)