User talk:Optakeover/Archive/2017/November

James O'Brien
The only citation to him having 2 daughters and always and only ever calling his wife "Mrs O'Brien" is evident every weekday morning between 1000-1300 on his LBC radio show on 97.3

He mentions them often and I added the info believing it adds a more rounded picture of his wiki bio — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.172.112.213 (talk) 18:55, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

GLENNON MELTON
JUST WANTED TO CLEAR UP WHY CORRECTING GRAMMAR/INCOMPLETE SENTENCES IS NOT DESIRABLE HERE... THE EDIT I MADE TO THE INFORMATION IN HER PERSONAL INFO MADE IT A CORRECT AND COMPLETE SENTENCE. I BELIEVE THE WAY IT WAS CORRECTED BACK TO IS AN INCOMPLETE SENTENCE AND THEREFORE NOT IDEAL FOR READERS. THANKS96.69.8.177 (talk) 00:02, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
Hello, I'm Optakeover. I noticed that in this edit to Cousin marriage in the Middle East, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Optakeover (U)(T)(C) 13:34, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Antoine Strassman
I appreciate the need for citations, and will try to dig them up, then re-edit. However, she is not a living person - this famous aviatrix died in 1952. 81.157.85.58 (talk) 13:49, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Edit
I removed content sourced to a journal published by the predatory journal farm OMICS. I said this in the edit summary. OMICS cites are strongly correlated with promotional editing, to the point that employees of the company are sitebanned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.21.88.44 (talk) 14:06, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

if i was an uncivil type who jumped to conclusions i would say you were belittling me,buddy.
I am autistic as well so i know sometimes guys/gals like us say ill-considered and some might say ill mannered things but you said i had "no justification" which if you read the Wikipedia official policy as I am sure you have sounds a lot like belittling besides you are saying it with out Giving the justification that i am sure you have. P.S i am part of the MM(see my talk page to know what it is) so compliance will be rewarded(this is an offer you cant refuse lol) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.76.79.199 (talk) 18:44, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Changing an edit I made on the LGBT coming out page in the politicians section
I think it's fair of me to call Danica Roem's incumbent rival a 'bigot' when the man famously referred to himself as Virginia's "Chief Homophobe". He admitted to being a bigot, so it is not used out of context or in a mean-spirited way. The man admitted to bigotry. Why not oblige him for it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Z34guy (talk • contribs) 08:07, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
 * On Wikipedia, all viewpoints are equal, especially and only if they are properly cited with reliable sources. Even after that, all content must be written in a neutral point of view which doesn't disaparage any person, thing or viewpoint just because the writer doesn't agree with it. Optakeover (U)(T)(C) 08:10, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Kunihiko Ikuhara
I am afraid that my contribution has been considered 'not constructive'. My statements were based on a reliable source - I am alluding to the collection of essays edited by Graham Harvey. I love Ikuhara's themes and style and I really did not mean to insult anyone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.229.136.127 (talk) 12:12, 10 November 2017‎ (UTC)
 * Hey, it was actually my mistake. I meant to revert a typo error in your edit, but I accidentally removed everything. You were right, I have helped you to put back everything you added. You can take a look here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kunihiko_Ikuhara&diff=prev&oldid=809634689. Sorry, and thank you for your message. Optakeover (U)(T)(C) 12:15, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Andrei ArIovski
You changed the Andrei ArIovski page after I changed his team to American Top Team. Andrei is now part of the American Top Team: http://mmajunkie.com/2017/10/skid-ex-ufc-champ-andrei-arlovski-training-american-top-team-ufc-norfolk — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.63.142.158 (talk) 10:43, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the message, but please remember to cite a valid source. Optakeover (U)(T)(C) 10:54, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Please
Block 188... and lock the article List of European countries by average wage.I took hours to restore and correct it.It's vandalized above in weekends.Best regards.Kingofwoods (talk) 11:50, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Need Help
Hi, In this page we need your help, This user adds incorrect information with bad resources. He did not speak English at sometime. YenWitch (talk) 11:47, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Greetings,

3 issues:

1- This user accused me of stilling 2 photos and candidate for deletion, while I took them myself and I even have proof for it.

2 & 3- There is a heated argument between fans of two teams form Tehran and I supposed he is a supporter of Persepolis F.C. and I can totally understand his feelings but what I don't understand is his intentions towards wikipedia's article about Tehran's Derby. The number of wins recorded for Persepolis is 21 and not 22, there is a match where after 120 minutes of playing neither of the teams could win and there was a penalty shootouts to determine the team advancing to the next level of that season's cup which was Persepolis and based of Fifa's rules the matches that are determined in penalty shootouts are considered draws, so the number of total wins for Persepolis is 21 and not 22 as this user keeps saying. Also in every single page dedicated to the derbies of the world including El Clásico and Derby della Madonnina and Derby della Capitale there is a section about head to head trophies, just like the page for Tehran derby. A while ago this section was simply removed by another user (I assume another supporter of Persepolis) which I undid it and then this user keeps removing this section simply because (I assume) he does not like the results he sees in there.

Thanks for your attention, vathlu (talk) 12:21, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
 * are you kidding me? These are slanderous, You have not even read the tips!YenWitch (talk) 12:56, 12 November 2017 (UTC)