User talk:Optokinetics

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Just H 23:55, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Image:Optokinetics.h.h.mark.redshift.optokinetics.pdf listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Optokinetics.h.h.mark.redshift.optokinetics.pdf, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 22:28, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Please remember to mark your edits as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.'  Stannered (talk) 19:09, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Optokinetics.h.h.mark.reciprocity.of.refraction.optokinetics.pdf
A file that you uploaded, Image:Optokinetics.h.h.mark.reciprocity.of.refraction.optokinetics.pdf, has been listed in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion because it is not an image, sound or video file and does not appear to have any encyclopedic use. See Criteria for speedy deletion (criterion I10) If you feel that this file has a use in the encyclopedia, please place the hangon tag on Image:Optokinetics.h.h.mark.reciprocity.of.refraction.optokinetics.pdf, then go to its talk page (by clicking Discussion at the top of that page) and insert an explanation of how the file is useful to the encyclopedia. Thank you.

Speedy deletion of Image:Optokinetics.h.h.mark.linear.motions.in.moving.frames.optokinetics.pdf
A file that you uploaded, Image:Optokinetics.h.h.mark.linear.motions.in.moving.frames.optokinetics.pdf, has been listed in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion because it is not an image, sound or video file and does not appear to have any encyclopedic use. See Criteria for speedy deletion (criterion I10) If you feel that this file has a use in the encyclopedia, please place the hangon tag on Image:Optokinetics.h.h.mark.linear.motions.in.moving.frames.optokinetics.pdf, then go to its talk page (by clicking Discussion at the top of that page) and insert an explanation of how the file is useful to the encyclopedia. Thank you.

Speedy deletion of Image:Optokinetics.h.h.mark.from.maxwell.to.michelson.optokinetics.pdf
A file that you uploaded, Image:Optokinetics.h.h.mark.from.maxwell.to.michelson.optokinetics.pdf, has been listed in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion because it is not an image, sound or video file and does not appear to have any encyclopedic use. See Criteria for speedy deletion (criterion I10) If you feel that this file has a use in the encyclopedia, please place the hangon tag on Image:Optokinetics.h.h.mark.from.maxwell.to.michelson.optokinetics.pdf, then go to its talk page (by clicking Discussion at the top of that page) and insert an explanation of how the file is useful to the encyclopedia. Thank you.

Speedy deletion of Image:H.h.mark.from.maxwell.to.michelson .h.h.pdf
A file that you uploaded, Image:H.h.mark.from.maxwell.to.michelson .h.h.pdf, has been listed in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion because it is not an image, sound or video file and does not appear to have any encyclopedic use. See Criteria for speedy deletion (criterion I10) If you feel that this file has a use in the encyclopedia, please place the hangon tag on Image:H.h.mark.from.maxwell.to.michelson .h.h.pdf, then go to its talk page (by clicking Discussion at the top of that page) and insert an explanation of how the file is useful to the encyclopedia. Thank you.

Speedy deletion of Image:H.h.mark.reciprocity.of.refraction .pdf
A file that you uploaded, Image:H.h.mark.reciprocity.of.refraction .pdf, has been listed in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion because it is not an image, sound or video file and does not appear to have any encyclopedic use. See Criteria for speedy deletion (criterion I10) If you feel that this file has a use in the encyclopedia, please place the hangon tag on Image:H.h.mark.reciprocity.of.refraction .pdf, then go to its talk page (by clicking Discussion at the top of that page) and insert an explanation of how the file is useful to the encyclopedia. Thank you.

Speedy deletion of Image:H.h.mark.from.maxwell.to.michelson.pdf
A file that you uploaded, Image:H.h.mark.from.maxwell.to.michelson.pdf, has been listed in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion because it is not an image, sound or video file and does not appear to have any encyclopedic use. See Criteria for speedy deletion (criterion I10) If you feel that this file has a use in the encyclopedia, please place the hangon tag on Image:H.h.mark.from.maxwell.to.michelson.pdf, then go to its talk page (by clicking Discussion at the top of that page) and insert an explanation of how the file is useful to the encyclopedia. Thank you.

Proposed deletion of Nanospectrum
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Nanospectrum, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? JohnCD (talk) 21:14, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Reference tags
Please note that should go at the location where the reference is referred to. Then the footnote is automatically added by the or markup. There is no need to go messing around with  tags. Stannered (talk) 21:31, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
 * As above your changes to Speed of light were added incorrectly: reference numbering is automatic, not manual, and corresponds to references inserted in the text, not notes. The formatting of both changes was wrong, as well as being in the wrong place. Finally extraordinary claims such as that the speed of light might not be constant need I think more support than a single reference, given the weight of evidence for it's constancy.-- JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 21:07, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

September 2010
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Albert Einstein. While objective prose about products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Thank you. JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 21:21, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Albert Abraham Michelson. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 21:25, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]] Please stop adding information about your self published book to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not the place to promote your book, which by by objective measure cannot serve as a reliable source.-- JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 21:32, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

February 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Speed of light, you may be blocked from editing. See also WP:COI. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 15:34, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at Speed of light. - DVdm (talk) 15:49, 3 February 2019 (UTC)