User talk:OrGW1899

List of Ligapokal matches
I changed your changes from yesterday because 2008 the Teams won't compete for the Ligapokal. Perseus1984 (talk) 17:28, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Festigal 1981.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Festigal 1981.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 19:07, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Problems with upload of Image:Kit left arm lightblue.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Kit left arm lightblue.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:09, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Club logos
Please do not add club logos to articles other than those directly related to the club. Club logos are copyrighted, and therefore may only be used under a claim of Fair Use, which their use in tournament season articles does not constitute. I have therefore reverted your edits to the La Liga, UEFA Cup and Copa del Rey articles. – PeeJay 13:10, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Your edits
Hi, and thanks for your contributions. I noticed that you linked some dates recently. This practice is now deprecated. Please see WP:LINKING and WP:MOSNUM. Furthermore, there is an Arbcom restriction on mass linking/delinking of chronological elements, although this is no suggestion from me that you are in breach whatsoever. I'm happy to respond to any inquiries you may have about the matter. Thank you for your attention. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:04, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Segunda División B 2011/12
I really appreciate your work and effort with the 2011-12 Segunda División B article, but the groups and the teams in each group are not going to be decided until they which teams promote to Segunda División B, in order to adjust them. Therefore, we do not know for example if the teams in Madrid are going to be in group 1 like this year or group 2 like last year. It all depends on where the teams which promote are from. Puertollano plays in group 4 which is in the same autonomous community as Albacete, which you've placed in group one. I think it may be better if the article was blanked momentarily until the groups are oficially decided (having saved your work from before, of course). Qampunen (talk) 21:54, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I took this team placing from Template:2011–12 in Spanish football. In this template it is wrote where every team are placed. But I think that it should not be removed,and when we will know the official groups I will change it. Meanwhile I will update the groups by the unofficial team dividing.

OrGW

Yes, but the groups from the template are not correct. If say 4 teams from canary islands promote, then the whole thing would change. The groups are unpredictable. I really appreciate that you have made the article but it's just that the article isn't correct if you know what I mean. Some people may think that Albacete is playing in group 1 and then in a month they see that they are playing in group 4. I will save what you've done on a file if you want to, and then once the groups are done in four weeks, I will paste what you did, together with some adjustments. Qampunen (talk) 06:40, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Fantastic job! You have saved me a lot of work ;) Again, thank you! Qampunen (talk) 09:36, 13 July 2011 (UTC) Thanks for your help and noting me about the groups issue! (OrGW)
 * I did what I could, since there are more things that I wanted to do but didn't manage, such as listing the teams that qualifies to the Copa del Rey last year, mapping the teams in each group, explaining why there are only 19 team in group 2 and write a calendar(like I did in the 2012 spanish football season) to the 4 group(because I didn't find it).

Are you intending to make (or are you making) the maps for the 4 groups in 2011-12 Segunda División B? Qampunen (talk) 20:44, 13 July 2011 (UTC)


 * I would like to, but I don't know how to. (OrGW) 00:08, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

You can use the 2010-11 Segunda División B article by copying and pasting the information of the teams which are present in both seasons. If you would like to, in order to make this fast and efficient you could do groups 1 and 2, and I could do groups 3 and 4 tomorrow. In this way we could finish the article very quickly. What do you think? Could you also help me updating the 2011-12 in spanish football template by including the Segunda División B teams? Thanks! Qampunen (talk) 22:03, 13 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Groups 1-2 and Segunda B teams in 2011-12 spanish football are done. Do you know where can I find the 2011-12 calendar? and where can I find why there are 19 teams in group 2? (OrGW) 12:50, 14 July 2011 (UTC)


 * You misunderstood me on the 2011-12 in spanish football. I meant the Template:2011–12 in Spanish football for the teams in Segunda División B. The calendar is not necessary (and it hasn't been done yet). For La Liga and Segunda División is fine, but for Segunda B or Tercera División is unnecessary. There is no need to explain why there are 19 teams in group 2, because there will be a new team in group 2 before July 16th. Good job on the maps! Qampunen (talk) 11:14, 14 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Example of what I'v done in Villanueva. Thats what you meant? (OrGW) 17:15, 14 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Not exaclty, but that needed updating too so thanks ;). If you compare Template:2010–11 in Spanish football with Template:2011–12 in Spanish football you will see that the Segunda División B teams are missing. If you have time, include them but if not don't worry. I would try and do it today if you couldn't do it. The 2011–12 Segunda División B is now sorted (I completed the stadia and locations for groups 3 and 4 now). Qampunen (talk) 15:15, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014–15 Segunda División B, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Galicia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Season by season statistics
Hi, Orgw1899. I get season by season of Spanish teams from several sources, but all of them are specifically for Spanish football. Basically:


 * BDFutbol from La Liga to Segunda B
 * Arquero-Arba for Tercera and Regional leagues.
 * And other Regional websites.

For Spanish football these are very good websites, but they are not useful for teams from abroad. Greetings. Asturkian (talk) 21:14, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 2011–12 Tercera División


A tag has been placed on 2011–12 Tercera División, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:04, 13 June 2016 (UTC)