User talk:Oracle987654321

May 2022
Hello, I'm ViperSnake151. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Is there a specific reason why you keep changing the content and presentation of Reception? ViperSnake151   Talk  21:40, 1 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi Vipersnake151
 * Firstly I'm new to Wiki editing, so apologies for the editing war - I wasn't aware of the procedure.
 * The reception section on limitless win which I was editing (poorly I agree) seemed unduly biased against Ant & Dec and the show. I feel that the show is shown in bad light by editing down the newspapers articles in specific way, for example; not including good headline from The Telegraph article.
 * Am I able to rework and resubmit extra info/detail - without removing the detail already there, such as adding the headline to the telegraph article and adding other articles? Oracle987654321 (talk) 16:17, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. I do not know what you are trying to "correct" by removing content, but how you are doing so appears to have a PR basis ViperSnake151   Talk  22:05, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Limitless Win, you may be blocked from editing. Drummingman Talk 18:13, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ViperSnake151  Talk  18:15, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. ViperSnake151  Talk  18:11, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. ViperSnake151  Talk  18:15, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Daniel Case (talk) 18:45, 4 May 2022 (UTC)