User talk:Oraklebat

Arrow season pages
First, you cannot copy information from other pages, merge it to another and call that notable. That's why the Arrowverse page DOES NOT exist, because it's just a merging of content. We don't create pages and hope that people make them notable afterward. Should other pages exist, probably not, but I'm not working those pages. It is generally expected that most season pages won't even be created until after a fourth season because of space, and should only be created sooner when they are notable. Right now, you are simply stealing information from the main page and character page and calling it unique. It's not.  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  02:35, 17 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The soundtrack information? You mean the stuff on the main page? Inserting a track list doesn't make it notable or "new" information. Look at the difference between Smallville and Smallville (season 1). The latter has unique information that isn't found  on the main page and has information making it notable.    BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  02:36, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
 * There's also no source for that music track information, and I feel like it was just taken from IMDb.    BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  02:39, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Look, you were bold in your edits, but they were reverted. If you disagree so wholeheartedly, then start a discussion at the LoE page.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  02:42, 17 September 2015 (UTC)


 * You haven't expanded anything though. Unless you consider pulling information from other Wiki pages "expanding" (I call it duplication) and adding an unsourced track list of music (which is not really notable by itself) that would likely get removed if it's simply taken from IMDb it's just from you watching, that's called original research.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  02:43, 17 September 2015 (UTC)


 * If you want to work on them at Draft:Arrow (season 1), that's fine. You list "expand" templates when you have a page that is already notable, but not large or extensive. Season one of Arrow (and season two) haven't shown to be notable. All of the information on them is information that Is on the main page or the LoE page. You cannot strip the main page and say that makes the season's notable.    BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  03:03, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Plot information isn't "new". It's plot and doesn't dictate notability. What again is new in music? You still have original research in your tracking of music, and the prose information above it all comes from the main page. The casting info on Amell is from the main page and Oliver's character page. The only "new" information I can read is about casting Diggle and the rest of the actors comes from GreenArrowTV which is a fansite and  unreliable  source. It's only usuable when it's a direct interview, which it isn't. Additionally, there is more original research in that section, as  you have stuff regarding Mia Deardon which isn't sourced, the stuff about Diggle's name. You've added fan speculation into the page and surrounded it with sources like they verify it. Basic announcement of casting isn't noteworthy. I know you're heart is in the right place, but you cannot cut corners because you really want a page to exist in the mainspace.  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  19:55, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
 * very well, would you mind explaining to me then what kind of information (or quantity for that matter) would dictate notability. (And btw everything about music that is in the Arrow main page was written by me so I doubt it would constitute simply copying information. The main page has become too long, and it would be better for organizational purposes to move information to articles of the season to which it corresponds (for example in production))Oraklebat (talk) 20:00, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Legends of Tomorrow Logo.png


A tag has been placed on File:Legends of Tomorrow Logo.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Alex&#124;The&#124;Whovian ? 11:01, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Arrow ratings
Template:Arrow ratings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Alex&#124;The&#124;Whovian ? 17:37, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Arrow ratings


A tag has been placed on Template:Arrow ratings, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 17:53, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Knightfall (character) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Knightfall (character) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Knightfall (character) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Kleuske (talk) 11:44, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

"Knightfall (character)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Knightfall_(character)&redirect=no Knightfall (character)] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Mika1h (talk) 11:54, 26 April 2024 (UTC)