User talk:Orangdepok1

Orangdepok1, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Thanks for contributing to the article Ananda Syahendar Perdana ‎. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Kuru  (talk)  02:44, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Indonesia edits
Hi, I reverted your edit because an alleged comment reported by an Indonesian minister about Indonesia being a "negara super power di bidang budaya" is not in my opinion important enough to be mentioned in the Indonesia article. If you disagree, please discuss this on the talk page before you add it again. Thanks. Davidelit (Talk) 03:16, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi, so you wanna said that our minister is a liar? Orangdepok1 (Talk) 02:35, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
 * It’s completely out of place, sounds biased as hell and irrelevant, whether it’s true or not. Juxlos (talk) 07:40, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi, bias and irrelevant is when you tell Japan is great power, if it's irrelevat UNESCO must be angry when our minister said that, right? thanks Orangdepok1 (Talk) 03:35, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ananda Syahendar Perdana


The article Ananda Syahendar Perdana has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Cahk (talk) 08:28, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi, With High Respect to you.. I think it's the same if you add some sources or not because some of my article or edit is deleted by irresponsible person with subjective view.. so i guess i add source or not my article soon be deleted.. Please control these people, it make uncomfortable to make article in this Great site.. If you ensure my article not be deleted soon i add the source if not it's the same.. Best regards.. thanks. Orangdepok1 (talk) 03:25, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Japan, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. ChamithN  (talk)  11:23, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi, come on man, why if i make article of my country with source you always deleted it with reason nonsense, and when you make article about Japan even it nonsense you tell that is truth.. It's very subective.. be objective man.. it's wikipedia, great site.. give respect to this site..

Talkback
ChamithN  (talk)  07:42, 26 December 2017 (UTC)