User talk:OrangeDog/Archive 1

Contributions Update/Transfer
Sorry, but there is not way to do that yet. I guess the only way to let others know if it list anon contributions in user new user space. I have seen others list anon edits. If I can help with anything else, let me know. -- Psy guy (talk) 00:15, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

Wikiproject Catholicism Assessment
Hello, fellow WikiProject Catholicism member. The project has recently begun work on assessing articles relating to Catholicism, and you are invited to comment and participate. The subpage for this assessment is located here. Thank you. — Mi ra  07:28, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Move Roman Catholic Church to Catholic Church
There is a vote at Talk:Roman Catholic Church: A Vote on the Title of this Article on moving Roman Catholic Church to Catholic Church. You are invited to review it. --WikiCats 03:56, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Diocesan Infobox
To the WikiProject Catholicism members

I have proposed at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Catholicism an infobox for Catholic Dioceses. I have not gotten any feedback on this proposal, so I’m culling feedback, advice, corrections, etc. for this. If you have the time, would you check out User:SkierRMH/Diocese_Infobox and give me some feedback! Thanks much!!

Giacomo Leopardi
Hi. I think we got our reverts crossed. You reverted one incident of vandalism, then the vandal edited again, and then I reverted the whole mess back to eliminate the new edit, your revert (inadvertantly) and the original three unproductive edits (2 sections blanked and a line of gibberish). You then reverted my revert. If the vandal stops, we'll sort it out then - the last good version appears to be by User:Jetman. Thanks! ZZ Claims~ Evidence 18:54, 27 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks! ZZ Claims~ Evidence 19:02, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Christianity
Hello !

You are receiving this invitation because you are a member of one of the related Christianity Projects and I thought that you might be interested in this project also - Tinucherian (talk) 06:38, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Hello
Hello OD. I'm fairly sure I was talking to you last night in real life - if not then apologies for misidentifying you. If you are the right person, then the page I was talking about was this one. It links to, which gives the syntax for Googling article space pages only (in this case for the term "occured"). Enjoy! Olaf Davis | Talk 08:53, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
 * You have indeed successfully located me. OrangeDog (talk) 16:09, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Good stuff. Thought it was unlikely I'd stumbled across someone else who matched you so well in parameter space. Hope you find the typo thing useful. Olaf Davis | Talk 08:36, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Zephiel
I think the whole Zephiel thing at List of recurring characters from The Mighty Boosh is bogus. Do you know anything about this? Should someone just revert as vandalism? Radiopathy (talk) 01:21, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Userfication Request
Could I have a copy of the deleted page Improvised Comedy Ents for the purpose of possibly raising it to an acceptable standard? –OrangeDog (talk • edits) 22:06, 15 January 2009 (UTC)


 * User:OrangeDog/Improvised Comedy Ents - done. (aeropagitica) 21:29, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my Huggle account, appreciated! treelo radda  13:47, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikiquette 20090227
OrangeDog, since you initiated the WQA on User:Hrafn, you need to take ownership of that WQA, at least to help resolve any issues that need to be addressed. If you would like, I can take care of the notification... Edit Centric (talk) 03:56, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism-only account
You removed the policy tag saying "not enough discussion". Yet you did not make any arguments against it being policy on the discussion page where there is a general agreement it should be policy. Please make your arguments on the talk page. If I don't get any sort of reason from you in a day or so as to why it should not be policy I will put that tag back. Chillum 00:31, 5 March 2009 (UTC)


 * There was not "general agreement", there were comments from only 2 other editors. Extensive discussion is required for promotion to policy. OrangeDog (talk • edits) 00:45, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

There was agreement by those who chose to participate on a talk page. There is also a bot that posts new policies to the Village pump after the template has been there a little while to make sure nothing slips past scrutiny. I put forth that the discussion was limited because this has already been how we do things for a very long time so making it policy is not controversial. There is no such requirement of "extensive discussion", I am not sure where you got that idea from. If you have any argument to make that it should not be a policy then make it on the talk page, but if your only argument that not enough process was followed then I am afraid that is not very convincing. Either defend your position with reason and discussion or expect your edit to be reversed. Chillum 01:51, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I got the idea from WP:NOMORE. I pass no comment on whether it should be tagged as policy, but that it shouldn't be tagged as policy yet. See WP:POLICY for how policy proposals should proceed. OrangeDog (talk • edits) 08:49, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

WP:NOMORE is a collection of opinions(an essay), it is not a rule to go around enforcing. I am familiar with WP:POLICY, I have been influencing policy decisions through discussion for about 2 years now. There is a discussion on the VOA policy talk page if you would like to contribute your opinions to it. Chillum 20:33, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
 * But I believe you will find WP:Policy is. Once more, I have no comment to pass on the subject, just that you were not following proper proposal procedure (adding policy without waiting for wide discussion). Please see the VOA talk page for other's notification of this and other issues. OrangeDog (talk • edits) 21:06, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

DYK for West Cambridge
Shubinator (talk) 18:52, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

South Park
From your contribs you seem busy, so I figured I'd let you know I responded to your comment over at the South Park page.  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  16:57, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Us Oranges
Did you know there are well over 2000 editors who are "Orange*", from User:Orange & Viridian to User:Orangezz? -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  17:38, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * But who was the first? OrangeDog (talk • edits) 23:32, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Bubble Bobble
As for source about the Taito announcement, I remember reading about it in a magazine at the time but it was in 1996. Nowadays, it's a well-known fact and is written on many websites but they don't get any sort of value for verification, maybe this one would do: http://www.arcade-history.com/?n=bubble-bobble&page=detail&id=343 ? About the PCB part, the best proof I can give is that my girlfriend and I own the PCB that was used as reference for the home conversions, it still has a "Property of Probe Entertainment" sticker on it. I can provide you with pictures if you want. We bought it some years ago from Simon Harrison (http://www.jiffysquid.net) who was working at Probe Entertainment at the time, he can confirm the story. Nomaxxx (talk) 00:49, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Pygmy
Hi, I spent a bit of time developing a dab page, then when I came to save it found you'd done so too. I overwrote yours by mine, as mine seemed a bit more thorough (in fact the deletionist tendency will probably want to delete some of it!) - hope this doesn't upset you. Cheers, PamD (talk) 22:05, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Nope, your version is certainly better. OrangeDog (talk • edits) 22:07, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * But you spotted the forest, which I missed! Have now added it. PamD (talk) 22:17, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Curse those trees getting in the way. OrangeDog (talk • edits) 22:24, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Yup - couldn't see the wood forest for the trees Sprightly Pygmy Rice Rats etc! PamD (talk) 22:45, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Walter Hood Fitch
Please do not reverse the image on this page again, your edits are not constructive. If you have an issue with the MOS, I suggest that you press for change in the appropriate place. Jenuk1985 |  Talk  22:52, 2 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Making an unfounded assertion is also disruptive, I did nothing of the sort cygnis insignis 02:54, 3 April 2009 (UTC)


 * botanist-inline2 is indeed in TfD as you can see if you look at any page it is transcluded onto. I assume that is what CI is referring to. To the first point, being bold is perfectly acceptable, and I have conceded the issue that was raised on the talk page after being reverted again. OrangeDog (talk • edits) 03:24, 3 April 2009 (UTC)


 * ... undoing Cygnis' unecessary reversion, which also removed text and introduced a TfD template. I restored the template, though unintentionally, but I did not remove [cited] text. I am the only recent contributor of text, however slight, during the recent flurry of edits. The announced 'edit war' is unnecessary, I hope this is not what drew your contributions. cygnis insignis 04:06, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * [insert] cygnis insignis 06:58, 3 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The text "and director of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew" was removed from the lead by your edit. I referred to your reversion as "unnecessary" because you could have easily just changed the top image, instead of unilaterally removing some useful edits. I came to the page after seeing this, hoping to help resolve a dispute (which appears to have worked) and improve the article. OrangeDog (talk • edits) 04:15, 3 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I refactored my comment. I will take something away from this exchange: I should be as thoughtful with my talk page statements as I am with my contributions and edit summaries in main space. You might consider the same regarding disruption and time wasting, in light of your 'unilateral' decision, and with regard to your unreferenced contribution "... director ". You could add a link for Kew, but neither of the references in that sentence support what you added to the lead. cygnis insignis 06:58, 3 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Firstly, the "... director " statement was taken from elsewhere in the article, as a lead is supposed to summarise the whole article. Secondly, the sentence did have a citation that supported it ([1] Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew: website), which while not ideal should still be sufficient. As for the image edit, I have already apologised for my poor reading of MOS:IMAGES. Please stop your "unfounded assertions" of disruption. OrangeDog (talk • edits) 18:35, 3 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I suppose you mean the bit "In 1841, W.J. Hooker became director of Royal Botanic Gardens". Do you mind if I remove your edit? cygnis insignis 18:50, 3 April 2009 (UTC)


 * You can if you want, but I think the lead (as well as the whole article) needs to be longer rather than shorter. Certainly it needs a better-formed reference though. Future content discussions should occur on the article's talk page. OrangeDog (talk • edits) 19:18, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Computing article assessment
Hi there! Regarding the offer you made at the reward board, I've started right on it! Best,  - down  load  |   sign!  18:00, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Cool, I'll dish out the rewards to everyone once the initial list has been cleared. OrangeDog (talk • edits) 18:24, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Alright; I'll try to do at least half of the backlog. :)  -  down  load  |   sign!  18:28, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Don't forget to leave comments for improvement where appropriate (particularly Start and C-class). Assessment should always be geared towards improvement. OrangeDog (talk • edits) 18:42, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll do that. I'm quite new to article assessment, so I apologize if I'm doing anything else wrong.   -  down  load  |   sign!  18:44, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * No problem, just make sure you're familiar with the general criteria and the specific guidelines on the project page. OrangeDog (talk • edits) 18:49, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

(reset) Alright! I'm done with assessing and giving comments for all but two, which I were unsure about.  - down  load  |   sign!  22:35, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Baseball
Kid, I've been watching Cleveland baseball for 37 years, don't tell me I don't know what a Cleveland Steamer is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.46.9.95 (talk) 21:26, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * If you can provide a source to convince me that it's not just Cleveland Steamer then feel free to re-add the information. OrangeDog (talk • edits) 21:29, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Village pump (policy)
I didn't get any advice. I was hoping since you did respond I could get some.

Otherwise can just assume the article is okay as is. Vchimpanzee ·  talk  ·  contributions  · 18:31, 17 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Looks fine. Remember to describe the character from a real-world viewpoint. Mentioning discrepancies is fine. OrangeDog (talk • edits) 18:37, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I didn't. But when I saw the real answer to how old he is, I had to replace other content and wasn't sure of the best approach to deal with what was there before. It's still in the footnotes. Vchimpanzee ·  talk  ·  contributions  · 18:40, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * If both answers are available in reliable secondary sources then they're equally valid. If the writers go on record clarifying the continuity error then you can write about that. Just use common sense. If someone doesn't like it, they'll change it. OrangeDog (talk • edits) 19:30, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Guilty Gear's Axl Profile: Rectification
Hello!

I saw you completed Axl profile and mentionned that he was based on Billy Kane of Fatal Fury but that's incorrect; he's based on Axl Rose, singer of the Guns and Roses band (I know you already know Guilty characters are based on metal and hard rock things ;)  ) Here is the link ifyou want to check ;) http://images.google.fr/images?hl=fr&q=axl%20rose&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wi

Bye! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.243.180.66 (talk) 21:53, 10 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Wasn't me, it was 82.29.5.215. I just fixed the grammar. I know nothing about Guilty Gear. OrangeDog (talk • edits) 14:53, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Script
Hi. I am in the process of developing a script to automatically correct common misspellings in articles. The initial goal is for users to have a button at the top of the article which will open an edit window and do a search/replace to correct common misspellings. When the script completes, it then shows the changes and allows the editor to decide if the changes were correct. The goal is to have as few falsely corrected entries, so some of the entries on WP:LCM wouldn't be added. If you are interested in trying it out, let me know. My initial prototype only has entries from the "A" page. There are probably some minor bugs in there as well, but it won't commit any changes without approval. The script is at User:Symplectic Map/spell.js and you just have to include it in your monobook.js file, e.g., User:Symplectic Map/monobook.js. If you are using something other than the standard theme, it would have to be included there instead. It should work on Firefox and Google Chrome. I haven't tested Internet Explorer. If you know of another script for doing this sort of thing, please let me know, so I don't unnecessarily waste any time. Thanks! Symplectic Map (talk) 20:52, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Skittles
Ive scratched my head silly for about an hour and a half trying to find a source for the company in 1973. It seems most sites have linked back to this article and just say 'a british company'. If i find something ill pu it in there but its a good point to raise for sureOttawa4ever (talk) 23:09, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

New bat
Yeah. Cheyenne can't hold the hammer too well in her wings, so she misses a lot. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 17:38, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Great Job Thanks !!
What a great fitting job you did on my Yves Varende/Yves Martens entry ! Cheerful thanks ! I am a new contributor to WIKIPEDIA and I still have to master all the Wiki technology and tools so I will use this modified entry as a reference in the future ! By the way, I am the co-author of the french version beeing a french-speaking belgian. Very best regards ( 'will offer you a renowed belgian beer next time you come to Belgium ! ) PHILTHEGUNNER60 --Phil from Brussels 07:32, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Hello again
I noticed a further helpful job of yours on the June Thomson's page. THX again but I still do have a few more questions about relevant/acceptable sources - simply " which ones are ? " I used the editor/publisher biography as available on the authors books back-covers ( a common practice among publishers of books in frecnh language ) or from foreword/introduction from my own library. June Thomson's infos for instance come from the french eds of her holmesian novels ( I collected them all as a fan ! ). I also used websites of book sellers ( commercial ones ) or forum of authors enthusiasts. I assumed that commercial links/websites may not be cited as WIKI is non commercial ( would look like some sort of covert advertising ?? ). Neither may I simply refer to " my own books collection " ( may I ?? ) or " such fans forum ". So what's acceptable ?? The beer is waiting you ! Cheers PHILTHEGUNNER60--62.235.213.148 (talk) 20:48, 31 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Broadly, any mass-published work (books, academic journals, etc.) is fine, just make sure you provide enough information to identify the book. Any original research by yourself, or by others, taken from web forums, is generally not suitable. More comprehensive guides are at WP:RS. If unsure about a specific source, you can discuss it on the reliable sources noticeboard.
 * Got any St Bernardus Abt 12? :p OrangeDog (talk • edits) 20:57, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Jeffersons
A third opinion has been given on the talk page, have you had a look? Alastairward (talk) 15:04, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Why should the entries be deleted?
You know the rule, don't you? So please tell me why the entries should be deleted?--141.89.77.122 (talk) 16:09, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Because they don't follow the rules. The articles you have linked to could not be entitled ACE or NME, moreover they do not contain any references to support (or indeed any mention of) these terms. Even if these guidelines were not clearly laid down, Wikipedia does not operate by following prescriptive rules. The reason that your entries were removed has been explained to you, and reflects the consensus of the majority of Wikipedia editors. Continued questioning and reversions are considered disruptive. Further discussion should continue at the Village Pump. OrangeDog (talk • edits) 16:16, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Why could not the article linked be entitled ACE or NME? Do you know those two chemicals?--141.89.77.122 (talk) 16:18, 6 June 2009 (UTC)


 * methylamide does not have an 'N' in it (nor is it considered notable enough for an article)
 * acetyl, as the article states, is abbreviated as Ac, not ACE
 * OrangeDog (talk • edits) 16:25, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Could you please google a little bit? I didn't find N-methylamide in Wikipedia, so I linked to methylamide. If you insist, I will change the link to N-methylamide. For ACE, how do you know that article of acetyl is correct?--141.89.77.122 (talk) 16:28, 6 June 2009 (UTC)


 * The information contained within it is verifiable from the given sources. If you can prove otherwise, then feel free to change the article, justifying the ACE disambiguation. For N-methylamide, the disambiguation link is only justified if you can prove that the subject is notable and fit for inclusion in Wikipedia. A Google search is neither sufficient to demonstrate neither nor verifiability. OrangeDog (talk • edits) 16:39, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Have you googled or not?--141.89.77.122 (talk) 16:41, 6 June 2009 (UTC)


 * That is irrelevant. Moreover, the search that I did do contradicts you - ACE is used to abbreviate Acetyl with Enzyme. OrangeDog (talk • edits) 16:48, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

It is relevant because if you do not even google, then how do you know that the link was wrong? Then how dare you to delete the link? It is good for you to google and find a new entry for ACE. I will add this new entry to ACE. What I mentioned is this link http://xray.bmc.uu.se/hicup/ACE/. It seems that you did not find this page. How about NME?--141.89.77.122 (talk) 16:54, 6 June 2009 (UTC)


 * No, no, no, no, no. Wikipedia is not a directory service for Google. A single Google hit does not justify a disambiguation entry. Disambiguation pages are to deal with existing articles that have the same title. If there is no article, then there should be no disambiguation entry. I did see the link you posted - it appears that ACE is being used as an internal marker for the purposes of that single study. There is nothing to suggest that the abbreviation is used in mainstream reliable sources. Just saying "google it" is not an acceptable argument on Wikipedia. If you have found a reliable source that supports your additions then give a direct citation for it. The burden of proof is on the person who adds the information to Wikipedia. N-methylamide does not have an article, so should not be added to any disambiguation pages. Have you yourself read WP:DAB and MOS:DAB before "daring" to change disambiguation pages? OrangeDog (talk • edits) 17:03, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

First, how do you know it should be *existing* article? Show me the sentence clearly. Second, how do you know that the abbreviation is not used in mainstream?--141.89.77.122 (talk) 17:06, 6 June 2009 (UTC)


 * The first line of WP:DAB - "Disambiguation in Wikipedia is the process of resolving conflicts in Wikipedia article titles".
 * How do you know that it is? Where are the reliable sources that support your position?
 * I suggest you read some of the policies and guidelines I have linked to before you attempt to continue this argument. OrangeDog (talk • edits) 17:10, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Did you find the word *existing*?--141.89.77.122 (talk) 17:11, 6 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Did you find the word *non-existant*? Common sense and Wikipedia consensus are that it means existing articles. Unless you have anything further to add I will ignore further replies as WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT. OrangeDog (talk • edits) 17:17, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

So you did not find the word *existing*. Then why do you rule out new articles?--141.89.77.122 (talk) 17:19, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

I did not find the word *non-existant*. I will not rule out link to existing articles.--141.89.77.122 (talk) 17:20, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

For ACE, the article even has already been there. Why should you delete it?--141.89.77.122 (talk) 17:25, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

I copied the discussion above including your 5 no's to Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous) to let more people know the debate. Anyway, you are better than those two persons which does not mean that you are good.--141.89.77.122 (talk) 17:36, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Matt Giwer
Usenet kook, known anti-Semite. Here I presume to make some sort of point because one of his article edits is written in the first person and makes it clear he expects to be reverted. Dougweller (talk) 21:07, 7 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Um, OK. He has a final warning now so can be blocked if he does it again. OrangeDog (talk • edits) 21:20, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Apology
I apologize to you. I should be polite.--SayNoToHypocritical (talk) 18:00, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

which articles seem to be a problem?
i've made a lot of edits, so i don't know what pages you want to bring to my attention. how is it a point of view to state that Jordan renamed the occupied territory of 1949 "the west bank"? it was called Judea before Jordan and their British allies conquered this land and ethnically cleansed it of Jews.

Please just put links to any articles that could be a problem on my talk page, and i'll get involved in the talk page discussions Yosef.Raziel (talk) 18:29, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks, that clears things up. Happy editing! - Yosef.Raziel (talk) 00:11, 11 June 2009 (UTC)