User talk:OrangeGremlin

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:


 * [[Image:Crystal Clear app ksmiletris.png|23px]]  Introduction
 * 5     The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * [[Image:Crystal package utilities.png|23px]]  How to edit a page
 * [[Image:Crystal khelpcenter.png|23px]]  Help
 * Crystal Clear app ktip.svg  Tips
 * [[Image:Crystal Clear app ksokoban.png|23px|]]  How to write a great article
 * [[Image:Crystal Clear app kedit.svg|23px]]  Simplified Manual of Style
 * [[Image:Nuvola apps konquest.svg|23px]]  Fun stuff...

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Abductive (reasoning) 23:48, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

September 2012
Please do not accuse experienced editors of vandalism when they revert your changes. Most of what you did was to edit the article from the Party's perspective. Some of the material on membership numbers - if its not simply a claim by the party - might stand. However you need to read WP:BRD and use the talk page. I'll give you a while to self-revert Snowded  TALK 13:10, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Big Dynamo
As you will see if you look at the talk page, this editor has been banned several times from the article. I sympathise with most of what you say, but you need now to avoid personal attacks and particularly WP:OUTING. Concentrate on specific edits. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 08:49, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

October 2012
Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to British Freedom Party, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 04:33, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ancient Egyptian race controversy, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Your edit summary was also a misrepresentation of your edit, it wasn't an 'update'. Dougweller (talk) 04:33, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Minor edits again
I see you are still marking major edits as minor. This is usually a sign of a sock puppet trying to escape detection or someone editing in a way they know they shouldn't be editing. I am not suggesting that these are your reasons, but that you need to stop marking them as minor because they simply draw suspicion to your edits if you continue after being warned about it. Dougweller (talk) 07:39, 16 October 2012 (UTC)