User talk:OrangeRIT101/sandbox

When you post the actual article, it would be better to add a paragraph mentioning why he is important and why there should be a Wikipedia article about him, and cite the source that proves this person is important. Khyejxxn (talk) 21:58, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

I think pictures would help and delve a little more into his life maybe not just business related but also personal life does he have a family if so how big that kind of stuff. Also maybe just some more discussion about C.O.P.Y as well because I feel there is probably more information on it and you could get a lot more out of it to lengthen the article.Droscoe2015 (talk) 21:50, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

R.McGee (talk) 21:59, 6 October 2015 (UTC) Isn't this supposed to be specifically about C.O.P.Y. not Martin Wrecke? If so you should probably make it read like that because right now this is an article on Martin which is not what it says on the Topics, but if it is intended to be about Martin then more background would definitely be a big help. If it is about a person it should go into background of the person and what they do now, also if it is about a person you have to create a strong case for that person being relevant enough for wikipedia to keep the page otherwise it is one of the most likely types of page to get deleted according to some of the readings we have done for class.

Lynaugh.ben (talk) 22:13, 6 October 2015 (UTC) Add a title to the page, move the information about Wrecke not a bio section, this article should be a bit longer with more information about his works, use more internal and external link so that it is easier for the readers, and varying is spelled wrong

In the article you mention two of Wecke's works. Instead of mentioning them in the same paragraph, give them 2 separate subheadings. Also, you need a title for your article. I like that you are using references, but maybe link the reference to the text. Overall, you have an interesting topic but you need to find ways to sell it to the reader, to make them interested in it. Mht5627 (talk) 22:19, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Remove the top level heading == C.O.P.Y == so that you have a Lead Paragraph. I would get a bit more info about the artist into the section Martin Wecke, perhaps his dates of birth etc. I think the brief mentions on the other works are fine, but then you need a substantial section on C.O.P.Y. That’s where that top level heading would go! Here you need a careful description of the work: what it contains, what it looks like, how it is made, how it is read, etc. Then a section called Reception where you talk about where it was published and  what is said about it. Good use of references - keep that up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.21.230.198 (talk) 19:24, 8 October 2015 (UTC)