User talk:Orangeman421

In response to your feedback
Your first article.

SwisterTwister  talk  21:46, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

Speedy deletion nomination of Navario
Hello Orangeman421,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Navario for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. SmileBlueJay97 talk 15:42, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Navario


The article Navario has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Apparently about a programming language that is not yet completed. No indication of notability given, and I can't even find evidence of its existence.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Peridon (talk) 16:08, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I think it's a bit soon for an article, if the language isn't finished yet. (WP:CRYSTAL might come in here...). If it is notable already, we need references to show that it is notable. I've not found anything on Google to show it has been noticed by anyone yet. You should have seven days to get something more together if you can. Read WP:RS about reliable independent sources. They are needed to prove notability - see WP:GNG for details of general notability. Good luck. Peridon (talk) 16:19, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I can see from your comment that you were not happy with deletion, but as you did not actually remove the Proposed deletion template, and its seven days are up, I have deleted the article. Even now, it will be automatically restored on request to me or at WP:REFUND, but I advise against that, because it would certainly be nominated at WP:Articles for deletion, a more laborious process involving seven days' discussion.


 * In my opinion it would stand no chance there, because an encyclopedia like Wikipedia is not a place for publishing anything new. A fundamental policy is No original research which includes:
 * "'If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it. If you discover something new, Wikipedia is not the place to announce such a discovery.'"
 * The same applies when you have invented something new. There is an inclusion criterion called Notability, which requires references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Also, people are discouraged from writing about themselves or their own concerns - see Wikipedia is not about YOU. The time for an article would be after your language is completed and is in use and has been the subject of independent comment, so that someone else is interested enough to write about it. Meanwhile the are sites like Myspace and Fcebook where you could write about it, or WP:Alternative outlets might give you other ideas. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 18:26, 2 February 2014 (UTC)