User talk:Oranj23

Speedy deletion nomination of Red Velvet
A tag has been placed on Red Velvet, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Red Velvet and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 14:54, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Red Velvet (movie)
A tag has been placed on Red Velvet (movie) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ironholds (talk) 15:45, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Red Velvet


The article Red Velvet has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No sources or demonstration of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Durova 357 00:08, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Do not vandalise my user page
Do not vandalise my user page. If you wish to discuss the deletion of the article Red Velvet, take it up on my user talk page or at deletion review. If you vandalise my user page again you will be blocked. J I P | Talk 17:48, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Welcome
I notice you haven't been welcome properly yet, so:


 * P.S. I have asked one of our best movie editors (User:MichaelQSchmidt) to lend a hand on the Red Velvet article. --ThaddeusB (talk) 00:05, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

If you have been treated badly here on wikipedia, I am sorry
I come here because of this message: User_talk:MichaelQSchmidt members of the Article Rescue Squadron and others will look at the article you created and try to see if we can keep it on wikipedia.

If there is anyway I can help you at all, please message me We are happy you are here, and would like you to stay.

Both User_talk:ThaddeusB (the nice editor who welcomed you above) and User_talk:MichaelQSchmidt are well respected editors, and they will be able to help you too, if you have any questions or concerns. Mr. Schmidt is an actor himself, and is seen by many as the person to go to about sourcing movies here on Wikipeida. Ikip (talk) 22:07, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

And for the future....
Please review the guidelines for avoiding conflict of interest, as it is far preferred that individuals not themselves so involved in a particular film do the writing. And please, always feel free to ask another here to look into something for you or offer advice. It would also be prudent to review Wikipedia's guidelines for determing film notability, as it is a notability that determines if an article will remain or be removed. These will lead you to Wikipedia's general notability guideline and then to Wikipedia's requirements for verification in reliable sources. The fact the the film had a nice write-up in Fangoria goes far toward establishing its merits for inclusion. And until a contributor learnes the ins and outs of article creation here, its always best to create the article in something called a sandbox. Yours could be created at User:Oranj23/sandbox/proposed article, to be worked on at your convenience... and with input from more experienced editors. I have myself made some improvements to the fledgling article. More will be in the offing. Best regards, and welcome.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 01:22, 5 December 2009 (UTC)