User talk:Orb452672

.

Cancel culture / welcome
I am discussing this here since it doesn't really pertain to article content at all, but is rather about helping you to orient as a brand new editor here.

Those who have argued against inclusion on the article talk page, myself included, have presented reasons. Those who have argued for inclusion have also presented reasons. That's the normal consensus process at work. So far neither side appears to have persuaded the other (at least not explicitly), so we rely roughly on numbers. That is perfectly consistent with policy and is indeed the norm. If anyone wants to put the matter to the test, they can always start an RfC on the matter. But as a general note I would suggest that you, as a brand new editor, might want to wait to acquire more experience here before attempting anything on that scale. It's also extremely important to assume good faith, which your comment could be interpreted as a failure to do. Any topic which involves post-1992 American Politics is covered by something called discretionary sanctions, and it is generally advisable to avoid such topics altogether while learning the basics such as "what does consensus mean". I suggest hitting up WP:TEAHOUSE with further questions.

Best wishes, Generalrelative (talk) 15:58, 1 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your comments, advice, and kind words. Orb452672 (talk) 16:16, 1 May 2022 (UTC)


 * You're welcome. Since I see that you have chosen not to take my advice re. post-1992 American politics, I'll give you the standard discretionary sanctions alert below. Please note that this alert does not connote any wrongdoing on your part. Generalrelative (talk) 16:55, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Generalrelative (talk) 16:55, 1 May 2022 (UTC)