User talk:Orbmc101

Speedy deletion of "David H. Childs"
A page you created, David H. Childs, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. D ARTH P ANDA talk 12:02, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Welcome
Hello, Orbmc101, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Happy editing! Shirt58 (talk) 11:24, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

"helpful information for new users" -wth?!?
Hi Orbmc101,

You've been around for so long, and no-one has WP:WELCOMEd you! That's truly wth?!?-worthy. I tried to chose a welcome message that didn't appear condescending... and I failed. Apologies - but at least you've got a (thoroughly well-deserved) welcome, if that's any consolation O_o. --Shirt58 (talk) 11:36, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Adding obituaries
Hi Orbmc101. I see you are adding obituaries as external links to articles. I'm sure this case was just a mistype, you added the link to the wrong section. But anyway, I'm not sure adding obituaries is appropriate. According to WP:ELNO, the first item states that the following should be avoided: "Any site that does not provide a unique resource beyond what the article would contain if it became a featured article." Clearly, all information in an obituary should be contained in an article, so an external link is inappropriate, don't you think? Best regards. --Muhandes (talk) 15:30, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Since you haven't answered, I am reverting these additions. Please address this before reinstating them. --Muhandes (talk) 15:55, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Edit Summary
Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. --220  of  Borg 17:15, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Norris Church Mailer. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. ''You are adding obituaries only by a specific person, and adding a link to that person. This is obviously promotional, and the matter was mentioned to you a year ago. Please stop.'' Muhandes (talk) 18:58, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The fact that you are adding only obituaries by a single person, which happens to be the only person you are writing about, shows very clearly that you are trying to promote him, against WP:EL. The fact that you are linking to his website shows that even more. Please stop. --Muhandes (talk) 19:20, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Childs (academic), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DDR (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:06, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Gailene Stock

 * This edit rv as unsourced. Yours, Quis separabit?  15:34, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gailene Stock, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victoria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)