User talk:Orcaman42

May 2015
Hello, I'm NeilN. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Campaign for "santorum" neologism seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Neil N  talk to me 17:58, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Also, read WP:NOTSOAPBOX. --Neil N  talk to me 18:00, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

I feel from my perspective my edits were extremely restrained & neutral. I'm sorry if you disapprove but my facts stand as they are based on the well documented history of the individual involved.


 * "As of May 27, 2015 Rick Santorum has announced his run for president of the United States."- this is fine
 * "Thus it is clear that a revival of this campaign is urgently needed for the good of this country & it's citizens as a whole as no president can claim to defend people he has already isolated in previous press releases."- this is your opinion, and so violates WP:NPOV. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:03, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Based off of : http://theweek.com/articles/479083/9-controversial-rick-santorum-quotes http://breakingcopy.com/rick-santorum-gay/ http://spreadingsantorum.com/archives/cat_santorum_quotations.html https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rick_Santorum%27s_views_on_homosexuality http://urbanlegends.about.com/od/government/ss/Rick-Santorum-Quote-On-Gay-Pornography.htm

I can go on & on & on but clearly he isn't representing the "entire community" equally, in addition his policies fly in the face of known social science & human behavior. So yes, "factually speaking" when I said, "for the good of this country" that's based on known facts that have been studied in various parts of the world. Amazingly human behavior doesn't change from country to country.