User talk:Oren06

Your submission at Articles for creation: Idmerit (March 23)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Idmerit and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Idmerit Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:HitroMilanese&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Idmerit reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 10:40, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

May 2023
Hello Oren06. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Oren06. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Sam Kuru (talk) 11:44, 30 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Dear Sam Kuru,
 * Thank you for your message regarding paid editing disclosure on Wikipedia. I appreciate your concern, but I want to clarify that I am not receiving any financial compensation for my edits on the platform. My contributions are solely driven by my personal interest and dedication to ensuring the accuracy and quality of information on Wikipedia.
 * I understand the importance of transparency and compliance with Wikipedia's policies, and I want to assure you that I have no undisclosed financial stake or affiliations related to the content I am editing. I am fully committed to adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines and maintaining a neutral point of view in all my contributions.
 * If you require any additional information or have further questions, please let me know. I am happy to provide any necessary clarifications.
 * Thank you for your understanding and attention to this matter.
 * Best regards,
 * Oren Oren06 (talk) 06:28, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I do not believe you. You've again added a purely promotional article sourced to garbage PR and paid placement. I've disabled this account. Sam Kuru (talk) 15:45, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Idmerit moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Idmerit. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – robertsky (talk) 17:35, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Idmerit
Hello, Oren06. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Idmerit, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Idmerit


Hello, Oren06. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Idmerit".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:18, 2 January 2024 (UTC)