User talk:Orendona

Welcome!
Hello, Orendona, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Kawasaki GPZ305 have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place   before the question. Again, welcome! Dennis Bratland (talk) 19:25, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Motorcycle sources
It's been discussed more than once, and motorcyclespecs.co.za is not a reliable source, it's a scraper site. They don't test motorcycles, and they don't tell us exactly where they get their numbers from. Mostly the copy from unknown websites, or else accept crowdsourced data. Personal websites are also not reliable. For motorcycle power, speed, weight, etc, we need sources who actually tested themselves, like Cycle World, Motor Cycle News, etc. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 19:28, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Picnic (1955 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moonglow. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Done Orendona (talk) 17:48, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Permutation
Your edits at the article Permutation have been reverted by several different users, and for good reason: they turn the paragraph into an incomprehensible muddle. Please do not edit-war by repeatedly making your changes; instead, begin a discussion on the article talk page. --JBL (talk) 15:22, 1 November 2020 (UTC) OK but it is completely wrong what they say about permutations without repetitions. They are not tuples. Permutations without repetitions is a scalar. Orendona (talk)