User talk:Ores78

November 2022
Hello, Ores78, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. -Object404 (talk) 02:58, 22 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the welcome. Long time Wiki fan with an account but no means an editor. No, I do not have any other accounts. I am also not coordinating with anyone. Are you? I also noticed patterns with your edits and your wording. Clearly you have an axe to grind with this person and want to bring him down. Perhaps you should also disclose the reason behind how and why you started working on this entry and your connections regarding this entry. Try to be fair as you are writing about a living person, widen your citation sources and be wary not to be used by people with agenda, if you really care about facts.
 * I am sure you are more familiar with rules than I am but just citing a few among many on this matter:
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Attack_page
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_personal_attacks Ores78 (talk) 11:25, 22 November 2022 (UTC)


 * These are merely the facts I have been able to find on the subject supported by Reliable sources. If you'll notice, I even created an awards and recognition section on the subject and am very fair. I even went so far as to try to do a thorough search as I could for reliable citation sources for the awards and recognition to place them there. All of the information I have placed on the subject are solidly backed up by WP:RS. Whatever issues individuals have with the article are should be taken up with the Reliable sources. -Object404 (talk) 13:10, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Creating with much fervor sections entitled "Fake news and disinformation" plus a separate section called "Criticisms" does not seem to be fair, is it? I have not commonly encountered such sections before for other profiles.
 * Have you read any of the source articles which your reliable sources are responding to as "false claims"? It would be fair if you also do thorough research on counter arguments also from reliable sources outside of your political leanings. Ores78 (talk) 13:59, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, I've read the source articles that the reliable sources are responding to. I've also tried hard to look for positive views and praise of the subject that are covered by reliable sources, instead, what I found were even more instances of fake news and disinformation being spread by the subject. What can we do if that's what most reliable sources state about the subject? I've been very fair with the subject. Call a spade a spade. We should not be doing WP:WHITEWASH. -Object404 (talk) 14:25, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm pleased to say I've found praise for the subject from WP:RS and placed it in the appropriate section. -Object404 (talk) 01:23, 23 November 2022 (UTC)