User talk:Orestmartynets

December 2021
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your recent edits appear to be intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally unpopular way, are highly disruptive and can lead to a block or ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 04:39, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Kyiv vs Kiev in historical articles
Hi, Orestmartynets: As a fairly new contributor, you are probably unaware that the current consensus is to use "Kiev" in historical articles. Please see this Request for Comment for the discussion where this consensus was achieved: Talk:Kyiv/Archive 9. Until the consensus changes, the articles such as Kievan Rus continue to use the "Kiev" spelling. Please let me know if you have any questions. --K.e.coffman (talk) 02:59, 22 January 2022 (UTC)