User talk:Originalideas

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Originalideas, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! A l is o n ❤ 10:11, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Your edits
Seriously - I don't know nor care if it's true/false/whatev - you can't go around posting that garbage on Wikipedia. Please read WP:BLP for what's wrong with what you said, as well as WP:OUTING and WP:NPA. I don't mean to throw all these acronyms at you like that, but you can't go posting unsourced stuff like that, and attacking other editors - you'll just end up getting your account blocked. Calm down and state your case, but be calm and understand that this is supposed to be a neutral, sourced encyclopedia we're editing. Check some of the links above in the welcome message before getting back to editing - A l is o n  ❤ 10:15, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

I am a stockholder in filmon.com which owns battlecam. Battlecam Lily is a biased employee who is writing on wikipedia. I fully agree I sounded off way too much.

Take the paragraph about all the challenges concering, urine, feces, fire and burning. I can provide the urls to the video's on youtube where users captured them. Lily, as an employee wrote this wikipedia to please her employer, billionaire alki david. AS a stockholder, I should have more concisely told the truth as facts and cited resources to back up the truth.

My question. Someone wrote that the page seemed like it was "written poorly as press release" and ask if it was a "tv". Is it fair, to anyone to assume that the written version of battlecam honestly represents what it is and what is going on there compared to the outright lies, Lily has written?

I may have been blocked but I feel the entire "battlecam" article needs deleted until she too, can prove what she claims. They had no 2 million in revenue. Ask her to show a source. As a stockholder, I can show you that my 30,000 share purchase at $1.29 a share last year has fallen in value to the sum of negative $21k. Where are my profits if my original investment of $38.4k has fallen to about $18k? I can send you a copy of my last stock quarterly report.

She has no right to out right lie about the profits of the site when filmon is worth less than half the value. So, that's my question. Since she is a paid personal employee of Mr. David, can we get the entire page deleted until there are actual cited facts to back up this entire page? Originalideas (talk) 11:27, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Blocked
Further to Alison's comments above, I have blocked this account as you seem to have no purpose here other than fighting an off-wiki WP:BATTLE. Guy (Help!) 10:33, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

I have an entire chat log of one night when Alki David paid a battlecam user to hide a cam in his bedroom. His "challenge" was to get the guy to "have sex with the woman on cam" while the entire battlecam crowd watched. One person spoke up and stated that if this violation of this womans rights were not made known to her, they'd summon the authorities to stop this illegal challenge.

Is this valid? yes/no.

I fully understand the purpose of wikipedia. I can provide urls to blogs where people set themselves on fire, urinated on themselves and others and took bathroom movement on the floor and wrote battlecam in the feces. THESE ARE INDEED RELEVANT facts to the workings of battlecam. I did not source them and apologized for this error and my lack of backing it up.

Mr. Davids paid employee is allowed to give a one sided false press release as fact and no one can challenge this? I'm just trying to figure out what to do, as a stockholder to set the complete record straight on battlecam. As I stated before, it is stated on wiki that they had revenue of over $2million. Let me show you one fact right now. http://i56.tinypic.com/k4wkt4.jpg This url shows my latest copy of my portfolio contain my purchase of filmon.com stock. It shows I purchase 30,000 shares at $1.299 and as of that date they are now worth 62 cents and I have lost over $20,000 on this stock. This wholly disputes the fact that they claim 2 million in revenue.

Without having a complete factual accounting, I requested, as a stockholder, to have this entire page deleted as spam. I can send someone the proof that I am indeed a stockholder. After I was blocked, that is all I asked. To have someone ask them to "verfiy" to wikis satisfaction, as they would ask of me, to prove these statements or take the page down.

Originalideas (talk) 15:34, 29 December 2010 (UTC)