User talk:Orlady33

Welcome!

Hello, Orlady33, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Julia Hurley have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or you can type   on your user page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Orlady (talk) 15:58, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

December 2013
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Julia Hurley, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. ''You have repeatedly removed "citation needed" templates -- and you also remvoed the references list. You may think that reference citations aren't needed if you know the information to be true and/or findable in an external link, but that's not the way Wikipedia sees it. Please read WP:Verifiability and WP:Citing sources.'' Orlady (talk) 20:00, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

In lieu of edit warring -- please discuss
You may not be aware that Wikipedia has a definition of edit warring and a strong policy against it, but your actions at Julia Hurley have instigated an edit war. Please consider yourself warned against edit-warring behavior -- persisting in an edit war is a good way to get your account blocked.

Rather than continue that edit-war pattern, I've opened a conversation at Talk:Julia Hurley. Please participate there. --Orlady (talk) 05:07, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because its username is a blatant violation of our username policy – it is obviously profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames, nor is trolling or other disruptive behavior ever tolerated. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text on your user talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Daniel Case (talk) 13:54, 18 December 2013 (UTC)