User talk:Orlanu Brecker

Welcome
You've been here since 22:46, 29 March 2006 and nobody welcomed you yet? Tsk-tsk-tsk...

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! ←Humus sapiens ну? 23:38, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

NPOV page
While I like and appreciate your exponsition on the WP:NPOV page, it's quite a lot of text to be added with no discussion on the talk page. I've reverted it, for now, and strongly suggest that you list your suggested addition on the talk page, and wait a few days to see what sort of responses are generated, then, assuming there is no objection, you can re-add it to the main page. Thanks for your work! JesseW, the juggling janitor 00:24, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

Poll on renaming article Jew to plural
Hi:

In looking back over the discussion at Talk:Jew I noticed that you had previously written about using the plural form "Jews" (or "Jewish people") for the article title. Someone recently added a poll on a possible name change. Please take a look. I'm in support of the move for the sake of consistency with other "group" names, and have attempted to provide examples from the List of ethnic groups; some have come out strongly against it. Perhaps you have a different take that would be appropriate, and might like to comment. Thanks! — LeflymanTalk 19:14, 9 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the note. I left a message on the talk page of the editor who closed the poll, Nightstallion-- in which I said that I felt the move to be pre-emptive, as the poll hadn't even been running six days. I think it should likely be re-opened, if he doesn't respond with a clear reason for early closure. (Considering that he wasn't the originator of the poll). -- LeflymanTalk 04:18, 12 April 2006 (UTC)