User talk:Orphanblackcloneclub

Welcome!
Hello, Orphanblackcloneclub, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Wanderlust Twins, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! No Matter How Dark (talk) 20:42, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Wanderlust Twins


The article Wanderlust Twins has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. No Matter How Dark (talk) 20:42, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wanderlust Twins


A tag has been placed on Wanderlust Twins requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Damirgraffiti &#124; ☺Say Yo to Me!☺   20:43, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Deleted page
I thought I'd explain why the page was deleted. Ultimately it was because there wasn't anything there to really back up any of the claims made in the article. All articles must be sourced with a reliable source that can be verified. Just saying that they're popular and that they were interviewed by Hollywood Online is not enough. You have to show us a link to this interview or something to show that it happened. Now what also concerned me was that you claimed in the article that they have a blog that receives millions of hits a month, yet I couldn't find anything that shows that this blog exists at all. A search for "Wanderlust Twins" doesn't bring up anything in the slightest, which doesn't mesh with the claims that they are wildly popular. I hate to sound harsh, but the claims in the article paired with a complete and total lack of coverage in an average search or on the article makes it appear that the article is pretty much just a hoax and an easily detected one at that. If you can find coverage in reliable sources that you can provide then you could re-create the article, but until then I would like to politely ask that you not re-create it any time soon. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   07:38, 9 February 2015 (UTC)