User talk:Orthodontic

Welcome

 * }

Redirects to OTA article from names of council members
Hi, I see that you have been creating redirects for names of OTA council members. this is inappropriate. If these people are notable (see WP:BIO or WP:PROF), they should have an article. If these people are not notable, then you should not even create these redirects. As for the OTA article, the listings of council members and such go against WP:NOTADIRECTORY and should be removed (except for the presidents). That particular article needs a lot of paring down anyway in order for it to become more encyclopedic... I have posted a welcome template above this message, which gives a large number of links to applicable policies and guidelines. Hope this helps. Happy editing! --Crusio (talk) 01:38, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Polish Association for Orthodontic Technology


The article Polish Association for Orthodontic Technology has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:00, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Orthodontic Technicians Association


A tag has been placed on Orthodontic Technicians Association, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:38, 17 April 2018 (UTC)