User talk:Orthodoxbush

A tag has been placed on Peeblonde, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Killerserv (talk) 01:03, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Peeblonde
A tag has been placed on Peeblonde, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD g1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Dom the dude 001 01:03, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

September 2007
Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia you will be blocked. Dom the dude 001 01:05, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

October, 2007
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Please consider making constructive edits to articles here. Vandalism, such as the edit that you made will be deleted, and may lead to your account being blocked from editing. LonelyBeacon 05:31, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Encyclopedia Dramatica is a site that is notable for attacking Wikipedia user. Any reference made to that website (especially a username like "Encyclopediadramaticaftw") is not looked at positively. Nishkid64 (talk) 01:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC)


 * That is a very stupid reason. I thought it would haver been because usernames should not mention sites, but User:The Wookieepedian does mention a site, but is fine because of anti-ED bias. Orthodoxbush 01:35, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * That also applies. The block is more along the "it's an inflammatory username" line. Nishkid64 (talk) 02:02, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * We allow for users to have "Wiki" in their username. That specifically says "Wookie", so it is fine. Nishkid64 (talk) 02:02, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Article talk pages
Article talk pages do not exist to host rants about the article subject's, such as you posted. Please limit yourself to using them to discuss article improvements, per WP:TALK. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 01:54, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Hamumu Software
A template has been added to the article Hamumu Software, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. Milto LOL pia 07:30, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on TBH, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Fun Pika  22:07, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Sup
U Jelly? --Zaiger (talk) 05:27, 10 January 2011 (UTC)