User talk:Ortizra2

OBJECTIVE
I am creating this page primarily to serve my personal objective of creating article with which I have interest.If by chance some of the article that I wrote would be of use to readers then I guess I have serve my objective of starting this page. For all intense and purpose views that will be listed would as much as possible carry reference to which readers can check. But to some extent it might be based on actual Personal experiences.http://osportal/gos/default.aspx Ortizra2 (talk) 11:21, 3 June 2008 (UTC) ortizra2

Welcome!
Hello Ortizra2! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you you need any help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place   on your talk page and ask your question there. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing!  Netsnipe  ►  16:16, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

This is my personal page and would post articles in the future Ortizra2 (talk) 11:29, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

My Opinion
The essence of having this technology of easily sharing insight from various sources from diverse people is in itself constructive since this allow a free flow of personal view. Since at times what is viewed by someone to be wrong is in itelf considered correct in another part of the globe. The free flow of knowledge and opinion coming from different perspective creates advances and synthesize this diverse view and in the end resulting to a much wider perspective of what the idea being discussed. One persons opinion is neither superior or inferior to another persons perspective. The decision what is to be perceived on a subject matter lies solely on the reader.

When a person try to control this freedom of sharing of thoughts and idea and branding one persons opinion as harsh and destructive is in itself defaulting to being  harsh and destructive to the very person he is accusing as such. Because in effect we are categorically judging that persons idea immediately on the premise of what we categorically think as right.

But what is right and wrong? This is more often subjective on the basis of whatever social standard considered as right and wrong. Is what you considered superior to what I considered right? Is what I considered wrong inferior to what another person considered wrong? But it is universally accepted that all person has the right to his own opinion. Whether you might agree or disagree with his opinion, regardless it is universally accepted truth that we should respect his opinion. Regardless of what a persons opinion is, a person has his right to have that opinion, and the responsibility that comes with having that opinion when his idea , opinion , results into action which results into affecting anothers persons opinion or existense.

But what is right and wrong, on the perspective of what is absolute right and wrong, the determination of this lies on the creator. Thus what should be considered as universally right and wrong is hindge on the absolute definition provided by the absolute mediator,...the creator. Ortizra2 (talk) 11:43, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Essence of Freedom of expression
Upon birth we are guaranteed of having the freedom to express our thoughts, feelings, and our belief and opinion. Regardless if the government or any institution would try to suppress this. In the end it will fail. NO ONE and let me reiterate that NO ONE can control what you want to think, what feeling you have at the moment you are reading this and whatever opinion or belief you have on something. Controlling this basic freedom of an individual is a manifestation of ignorance of the basic natural law.

Everyone has the right to express ones opinion and belief. If any man will subvert or suppress ones right to this basic freedom it is only manifesting his ignorance and regards to a persons human right.

No one person has a monopoly of idea. One persons idea or opinion should not be considered as inferior nor superior to another persons idea. I may not fully understand nor agree what and why you have that opinion or idea but as a human being I respect you for your opinion.Ortizra2 (talk) 11:57, 3 June 2008 (UTC)