User talk:Orwellianist

Not moved
May I asked why you marked Talk:Güveç (cooking) as Not moved? Nobody opposed the move (and indeed, nobody could, as there are no grounds on which to oppose). It was an as undisputed move as they come.--Orwellianist (talk) 14:59, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Closed as Not Moved because no-one provided compelling evidence it was the primary topic. Other than the requester, no one supported it either --Mike Cline (talk)}
 * "Unlike articles for deletion, where lack of participation requires relisting, no minimum participation is required for requested moves because for most moves there is no need to make a request at all; the need arises only because of a technical limitation resulting from the target article name existing as a redirect with more than one edit. Thus, if no one has objected, go ahead and perform the move as requested" (Requested moves/Closing instructions) I didn't need to give compelling evidence because I knew that it would be uncontested, as anybody familiar with the subject would know which is the primary topic. Still, I gave the evidence in case an outsider or administrator would like to see it; take a look at https://www.google.com/#q=güveç&tbm=bks and see that almost every single one of the 3.320 results refer to the meaning in this article. You can use any other search engine or any other research method as well. Please tell me how may I further dispel your suspicion, as that seems to be the only thing standing in the way, not Wikipedia policy or other users.--Orwellianist (talk) 15:27, 31 October 2015 (UTC)


 * I would suggest WP:Move review. --Mike Cline (talk) 15:31, 31 October 2015 (UTC)


 * I will, if you don't correct the outcome yourself. Do you have any reason not to? That the page should be moved seems straightforward to me, given Wikipedia policy, discussion and sources. If you precipitately closed the request and now recognize that it should be moved, perhaps you can correct it yourself.--Orwellianist (talk) 15:43, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

The flag?
How fictitious is the flag, you removed in the Sanjak of Bosnia article Alexis Ivanov (talk) 23:58, 8 November 2015 (UTC)


 * It's completely made up. You can see some discussion at Template talk:Country data Ottoman Empire and Talk:Flags of the Ottoman Empire. Unfortunately some users are continuing to use those made up flags that have long been repudiated.--Orwellianist (talk) 00:02, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite
Hi. The WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Osmanlı Bayrağı
Selamlar, (Aynı metini commons'taki sayfanızda da yazdım ama burayı daha sıklıkla kullanıyor olabileceğinizi düşünerek buraya da kopyalıyorum.)

Osmanlı Bayrağı maddesinde birkaç ay önce yaptığınız değişikliği ve (edit savaşı denemeyecek kadar küçük olsa da) birkaç kez versiyonlar arası git-gel yapıldığını far ettim. Eski bayrağın orijinal yükleyicisi olarak sizin versiyonunuzun özellikle geç Osmanlı dönemi bayraklarını daha iyi yansıttığını düşünüyorum. Benim 2007'de bir tasarım öğrencisi iken yarım saat içinde yaptığım bu bayraklar tuhaf bir biçimde benimsendi ve sanki gerçekten Osmanlı'nın resmi bayrağıymış gibi kabul gördü. Bunu sizin versiyonunuzu revert edenlerin itirazlarında da görmek mümkün. Halbuki bildiğiniz gibi standart bir Osmanlı bayrağı yok ve 1844'deki Tanzimat reformlarından beri çeşitli kalınlıkta ve biçimlerde ay ve yıldızların kullanıldığı bayraklar görmek mümkün.

Dediğim gibi sizin versiyonunuzun daha isabetli olduğunu düşündüğüm için size destek çıkmak istiyorum. Ayrıca sizin versiyonunuzun benim ilk yaptığım (ve DsMurat'ın rengini değiştirdiği) versiyondan epey farklı olduğunu düşünüyorum. O yüzden üreten kısmında sizin mahlasınızın yer alması gerektiğini düşünüyorum.

Birazdan bu bahsettiğim değişiklikleri yapacak ve talk sayfasında sizin bayrağınıza destek çıkacağım. Orijinal bayrağın yükleyicisi olduğumu belirtirsem potansiyel bir edit savaşı riskini önleriz diye tahmin ediyorum.

Uzun vadede ise şöyle bir önerim var; Seattle'da yaşıyorum ve University of Washington'daki Selim Sırrı Kuru Hoca ile bağlantım var. Kendisinin uzmanlıklarından biri Osmanlı bayrakları diye biliyorum. Onun tavsiyeleri ışığında (gerekirse) sizin versiyonunuz üzerinde ufak tefek değişiklikler yapmaya açık olur musunuz?

Saygılar, Kerem Özcan (talk) 08:12, 26 June 2018 (UTC)