User talk:Osama hussain aatish khan

August 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Sargodha has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sargodha was changed by Osama hussain aatish khan (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.876916 on 2013-08-10T19:18:21+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:18, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sargodha with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  -Ryan  19:20, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Sargodha with this edit, you may be blocked from editing.  -Ryan  19:21, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Sargodha.  -Ryan  19:23, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors&#32; according to your reverts at Sargodha. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. S M S  Talk 19:26, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. -- S M S  Talk 19:52, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. See the block list for more blocks. Bbb23 (talk) 20:15, 10 August 2013 (UTC)