User talk:Osarjusz

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frank Bayard (August 17)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Frank Bayard and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Frank Bayard, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Frank_Bayard Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theroadislong&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Frank_Bayard reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:10, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frank Bayard (August 27)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clarityfiend was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Frank Bayard and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Frank Bayard, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Frank_Bayard Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Clarityfiend&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Frank_Bayard reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Clarityfiend (talk) 20:49, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello,. Why would you literally remove several articles that were already there and hadn't had any notability issues in the past? I don't get it, it's not like wikipedia's server are going to burn Osarjusz (talk) 22:21, 28 August 2021 (UTC)


 * It's not that they don't have notability issues. It's just that nobody noticed them until now. Lots of hoaxes, for example, don't get spotted for years. Also, standards have become more strict as time goes on. These articles have inadequate sourcing, so WP:GNG. is not satisfied. The office itself is just not enough. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:31, 28 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Well, i guess wikipedia isn't the free encyclopedia as i have always thought and as time goes on there would be less articles instead of more Osarjusz (talk) 22:37, 28 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Also i don't understand why some random sportsmen are important just because they are sportsmen, it is just a tile after all Osarjusz (talk) 22:38, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Frank Bayard for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frank Bayard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Frank Bayard until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Clarityfiend (talk) 11:03, 14 December 2022 (UTC)