User talk:Oscar.dm

Welcome to Wikipedia
Mushroom (Talk) 13:24, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Touring the Angel
Hi there. Regarding the Touring the Angel article, the number of countries that the group performed in for that tour is actually 32, which you can count for yourself from the tour date listings. Please do not edit the article, thanks. (Freak.scenery (talk) 02:09, 15 December 2009 (UTC))
 * Did you not count the countries? I will list them for you here: 1. United States, 2. Canada, 3. Germany, 4. Czech Republic, 5. Belgium, 6. Switzerland, 7. France, 8. Spain, 9. Portugal, 10. Austria, 11. Italy, 12. Denmark, 13. Sweden, 14. Norway, 15. Russia, 16. Finland, 17. Poland, 18. Estonia, 19. Latvia, 20. Lithuania, 21. Hungary, 22. Croatia, 23. Netherlands, 24. United Kingdom, 25. Mexico, 26. Slovakia, 27. Slovenia, 28. Bulgaria, 29. Romania, 30. Ireland, 31. Turkey, 32. Greece. Again, please do not adjust the article, thanks. (Freak.scenery (talk) 02:52, 15 December 2009 (UTC))

Tour of the Universe
Hi. Please do not vandalise this page. You are repeating the same information within the introduction and the overview. Furthermore, a separate overview is unnecessary until the completion of the tour.

The Billboard information is not particularity notable. Perhaps if the group were in the top 10 of that list, but 20th in a list of 25 acts... I do not deem it noteworthy. (Freak.scenery (talk) 14:22, 16 December 2009 (UTC))


 * Explain to me why you think this information is worthy for inclusion. For the uninformed reader, there is no description of what a "tour projection" is, nor is there a description of how these "projections" are utilised. (Freak.scenery (talk) 16:11, 20 December 2009 (UTC))


 * I certainly have no idea what you mean by "tour projections", I'm guessing they are the various videos that are displayed on the screens in concert for each song. Either way, I do not deem this content noteworthy, at least in the fashion you have presented it within the article. (Freak.scenery (talk) 18:49, 20 December 2009 (UTC))


 * As I have said before, the Billboard information is not particularly notable. It is also unrepresentative: while for most, if not all of the other acts the data considers all tour dates on their particular schedule, the data for Depeche Mode only takes into account the dates on the North and South American legs. Again, please do not disrupt the article. (Freak.scenery (talk) 01:46, 5 March 2010 (UTC))

--John (talk) 21:33, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 20:32, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Exotic Tour/Summer Tour '94
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Exotic Tour/Summer Tour '94. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Exotic Tour/Summer Tour '94. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Subtle Errors
You appear to be introducing subtle errors into articles, as you did here and here. I'm not sure of your intentions, but such errors might be misconstrued as "Sneaky vandalism" (see Page blanking). Please don't make such factual changes to an article without verifying it with a reliable source. See WP:VERIFY.  Jwesley 78 23:53, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 * And again. We are reaching a point where loss of editing privileges is a possibility. --John (talk) 22:44, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

PopMart
And Oceania and Africa are different continents. U2 does not have a PopMart page up last time I checked (yesterday), and every source I have seen lists it as four legs. It is entirely possible for the same leg to visit multiple continents and, looking at the date gap, it's fairly obvious it is the same leg. Stop edit-warring. MelicansMatkin (talk, contributions) 14:50, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Alright, thank you for providing a source to back up your statement. In future when posting on a talk page, please sign your messages with four tildes like this: ~ . Cheers, MelicansMatkin (talk, contributions) 15:01, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Live in Barcelona
Hello Oscar, I wonder where you get the info regarding the Depeche Mode "Live in Barcelona" DVD release date? best, Sunil060902 (talk) 15:22, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Any verifiable info regarding the release date for the Touring the Angel DVD? I've tried searching depechemode.com, Home, Amazon and Mutebank.co.uk and haven't found anything. best, Sunil060902 (talk) 11:35, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

February 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article A Momentary Lapse of Reason, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Parrot of Doom 21:10, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Songs of Faith and Devotion
Stop changing the sales stats, especially without providing evidence. The album has yet to surpass 1,000,000 units, and is most certainly not at 1.4 M. If you continue to vandalize the article, you will be reported. BGC (talk) 21:25, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Oscar: Depeche Mode are synthpop, not synthrock. And SOFAD itself has lots of electronic elements to it if you listen carefully. best, Sunil060902 (talk) 11:36, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to The Division Bell. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Parrot of Doom 23:43, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at AC/DC, you will be blocked from editing. ''Re: this edit

You are intentionally introducing factual errors. Please stop.''  Jwesley 78 00:27, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * BTW. The name of the reference (for the fact you changed) was: &lt;ref name="Back In Black sold 45 million copies"&gt;  Jwesley 78 01:04, 27 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Please be very careful always to add a reliable source whenever you add anything to an article. If you continue to ignore this core policy, you will find your editing privileges restricted or suspended. Numerous people have warned you of this before and collective patience is waning. Please stop and edit according to our policies. Thanks, --John (talk) 22:41, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I have to second this. You are clearly going to a lot of effort and time to add info - but, your efforts don't mean much if you don't add your sources. Yet, the effort taken to simply provide a source is minimal in comparison to the actual your efforts so far. You just have to go that tiny bit further. While I want to encourage all valuable contributions, I'm not opposed to them being removed if there are no reliable sources. kind regards --Merbabu (talk) 01:54, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

U2 360 box scores
I have reverted your edits that restored the table. There was a discussion on the talk page some time ago and it was removed due to concerns about accuracy. Beyond that, the sourcing is incorrect, the list serves little purpose not already summarized by a sentence in the article discussing the total gross for the year, and other editors have indicated that they also believe such lists to be redundant. Quite simply we don't need an inaccurate breakdown of every single city when a sentence in the prose for the year's gross serves much better to get the data across. I encourage you to reopen the discussion on the article's talk page if you feel differently as opposed to reverting again and turning it into an edit war. MelicansMatkin (talk, contributions) 18:08, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

WP:BADCHARTS
Please do not include the Argentina Top 100, the Chile Top 100, or any other chart listed at WP:BADCHARTS to any Wikipedia articles. Thank you.&mdash;Kww(talk) 23:52, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

March 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Depeche Mode. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JD554 (talk) 15:34, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.--John (talk) 15:55, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --John (talk) 15:56, 17 March 2010 (UTC)


 * See WP:PEACOCK for why Depeche Mode are one of the most successful, influential and longest-lived bands from the early 1980s is not acceptable language here. --John (talk) 15:22, 19 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Please don't revert the good faith edits of others. If I see you doing this again I will block you. --John (talk) 16:51, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * While I do appreciate the many good contributions you have made, there's been a problem with a longterm edit war between you and another user going back a while now. I am putting you both on 0RR, which means neither of you must revert, at all, until the matter is resolved in article talk. Please go to Talk:Depeche Mode and make your arguments there. This edit war is preventing further improvement of the article and I am going to stop it. Let me know if there's anything you don't understand. --John (talk) 05:19, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Stone Roses live performances
A tag has been placed on The Stone Roses live performances requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. M aen K. A. Talk  15:29, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

April 2010
Hi again Oscar.dm. Another user has complained that you added information here without citing a source. As there have been several complaints about this, I warn you that if I see you do this again, I will have no choice but to block you. Any information that may be challenged must always be accompanied by a source. Thanks for your understanding. --John (talk) 15:17, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary. --220.101.28.25 (talk) 20:56, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Edit war
Please read WP:EDITWAR and WP:3RR and desist from making any more reverts unless there is a consensus discussion in talk. Thanks. --John (talk) 21:05, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Depeche Mode tour articles
I'm getting tired of reverting these edits. And evidently you are not interested in reaching consensus on this by continuing to engage in edit warring. I guess I would have a hard time understanding you anyway since it appears English is not your first language. "Stop, not change" is not a good enough reason to keep the tour date listings appearance the way it was.

My reason for changing the appearance is to remove the breaks in the listings because, in my opinion, the tour dates flow much better in one box rather than a dozen or so separate boxes. In its previous appearance, if a user edited a section then a break would usually have to be subsequently added to give some distance between each of the boxes, which was a cumbersome process. Furthermore, the columns have also been widened to make use of the extra space on the page. The support acts are listed in their own section lower down the article, which makes sense because such information is not of major importance.

I haven't run into any objections on any of the other band touring articles in which I have updated the appearance of the tour date listings, such as Black Ice World Tour or World Magnetic Tour. So why exactly are you so opposed to this? (Freak.scenery (talk) 15:45, 1 June 2010 (UTC)).


 * I don't know, the updated appearance looks pretty orderly to me; I can't see how it could be any more ordered. The different legs are very easy to identify through the headers within the darker-shaded boxes. As I said, information about support acts are really not of critical importance; they do not need to be mixed in with the listings of tour dates. Those who want to find out which act supported at whatever date can do so by checking the particular section. Breaking up the listings with support acts is cumbersome especially in the case of the Touring the Angel article, where there are a total of 22 support acts in the final leg (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Touring_the_Angel&oldid=365079075). That's far too long a break to implement in between listings. (Freak.scenery (talk) 03:39, 2 June 2010 (UTC))


 * When you are unblocked please respond to my above comments and provide constructive criticism about the appearance of these articles. If you continue to revert these pages without discussing this matter with me or on the Talk:Depeche Mode you will be reported. (Freak.scenery (talk) 15:56, 15 June 2010 (UTC)).

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a short time to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below. --John (talk) 20:38, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a short time to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below. --John (talk) 15:02, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Stone Roses discography
The source you cited for the release date of the first Stone Roses album does not in fact state April 1989. Consequently I have reverted your edit. If you do happen to find any reliable source then please do add it. Thanks. Longwayround (talk) 15:17, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010
You have been blocked from editing for a short time to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text. --John (talk) 19:15, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

August 2010
You have been blocked from editing for a short time to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text. --John (talk) 06:10, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Depeche Mode discography#Singles - Personal Jesus 2011 French chart position
Hi,

Depeche Mode's "Personal Jesus 2011"-single chart position in the wikipedia discography should be #91, not #11. I corrected it already once, but you removed it and added it as "Wrong peak position". That's why I decided to let you know why #91 is the correct position in this case.

It's true that "Personal Jesus 2011" reached #11 in France on 30 May 2011, but that was on the French Physical Singles Chart which includes only the sales for CD- and vinyl-singles. Since 4 February 2011, the Official French Singles Chart also includes download sales to the Official Singles Chart. Therefore there's at the moment three French Singles Charts; the Official Top 100 Singles (physical+download), Top 100 Physical Singles Chart (only physical sales), Top 50 Download Chart (only digital/download sales). Out of these the first one should in all cases be used here on the Wikipedia as it represents the "true" singles sales in France. For example the week "Personal Jesus 2011" reached #11 on the Physical Chart, it didn't even chart on the combined Top 100 Chart, an indication of how minimal the physical singles sales actually is in France.

The #91 chart position was reached already in 18 April 2011 (listed as 23/04/2011 on LesCharts.com), when the single was relased in digital format and charted on download sales. There's however an error for that week on that chart on LesCharts.com (http://lescharts.com/weekchart.asp?year=2011&date=20110423&cat=s ) as it lists the #91 chart psoition as a re-entry for the Original 1989 version, but it should be listed as the 2011 version, and therefore the #91 chart position is not in the list for Depeche Mode's chart history on that page.

Kai81 (talk) 17:50, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)