User talk:OscarCookie

Vidivic
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Vidivic, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Vidivic. Zelse81 (talk) 09:22, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Since the above is automated from my software, let me say personally that I encourage you to examine the notability of the software and post about it. Worst-case if you dispute it the article gets discussed over at WP:AFD, so you've nothing to lose by trying. I bear no ill will or anything about the product; good luck with your work and the article, and I hope you decide to stick around and contribute more. As I said in the PROD piece, I don't think you're spamming or being a vandal or anything and that's not what the nomination reflects. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact me on my talk page at User_talk:Zelse81. Have a good day. Zelse81 (talk) 09:24, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Article nominated for speedy delete
A tag has been placed on Vidivic requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Calltech (talk) 20:21, 21 January 2008 (UTC)