User talk:Oscar burrito

October 2013
Hello, I'm Jmeeter. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Tea Act because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=579653771 here]. teratogen (talk) 19:55, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sugar Act. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Sugar Act was changed by Oscar burrito (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.969969 on 2013-10-31T19:57:54+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:57, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Sugar Act with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Lugia2453 (talk) 19:59, 31 October 2013 (UTC)