User talk:Oscardagrch

This is being posted on your Talk page where you can receive messages from other Wikipedians and discuss issues and respond to questions. At the end of each message you will see a signature left by the editor posting. This is done by signing with four  ~  or by pressing or  in the editing interface tool box, located just above the editing window (when editing). Do not sign edits that you make in the articles themselves as those messages will be deleted, but only when using the article talkpage, yours or another editor's talkpage. If you have any questions or face any initial hurdles, feel free to contact me on my talk page and I will do what I can to assist or give you guidance and contact information.

Again, welcome! Buster Seven   Talk  13:55, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

July 2021
Hello, I'm TJRC. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to La Jolla Country Day School have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. TJRC (talk) 00:41, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

May 2024
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Beth Van Duyne. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:25, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy, as you did at Beth Van Duyne. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Your block of me was improper as was your deletion of the comment. The statement I had posted was . This was supported with a citation to the Daily Mail (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13426423/rep-rich-mccormick-files-divorce-wife-debra-miller.html) which you kept deleting. The article very clearly states that . The Daily Mail is a reliable, verifiable source and the statement is neutral. Your blocking is overly aggressive and improper. Oscardagrch (talk) 17:10, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
 * You're still violating WP:BLPGOSSIP. WP:DAILYMAIL is the opposite of a reliable source; it has been deprecated. You edit warred to reinsert a BLP violation onto the page without using a reference at all. My block was clearly appropriate to prevent your continued edit warring of a BLP violation. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:17, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Looks like my edit was correct. Daily Mail was correct. Also defamation is different for public figures and this was not it. Ass. Oscardagrch (talk) 02:39, 14 June 2024 (UTC)