User talk:Oshag03

On your own user talk page, you may remove comments from others, although archiving is generally preferred and removing comments without any reason is generally regarded as uncivil. The text of another user's comment, however, may never be directly edited to misrepresent the person or change the meaning of the comment. I removed the comments due to the fact that I resolved the Image legality issue. Oshag03 20:40, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:S10.JPG
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:S10.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Liftarn 09:16, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:1998 nissan 200sx.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:1998 nissan 200sx.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Liftarn 09:25, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Nissan 200sx Article.
Is there any reason why the information specific to the Australian model --

"he model that was eventually released had cost-cutting measures which included a detuned SR20DET engine with only 147 kW instead of the japanse spec 183 kW, and deletion of the rear wiper. It was initially released in both Spec-S and Spec-R trims, but the trim and accessory variations were limited."

Was removed from the article in July last year?

Is it not accurate? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.250.222.52 (talk) 23:45, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:PascoSheriffStarSmall.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:PascoSheriffStarSmall.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:13, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PascoSheriffStarSmall.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:PascoSheriffStarSmall.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 14 August 2016 (UTC)