User talk:OsirisGDR

October 2023
Hello, I'm Dormskirk. I noticed that you recently removed content from Hipgnosis Songs Fund without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 20:35, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Hello, OsirisGDR. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Hipgnosis Songs Fund, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the edit COI template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see );
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see );
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 20:01, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Hipgnosis Songs Fund, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 22:40, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

March 2024
Hello, I'm Quaerens-veritatem. I noticed that you recently removed content from Patrick Leonard about his marriage to Olivia d'Abo without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summaries. The edits were incorrect and apparently not researched. See, last paragraph of Leonard’s lede and Olivia d’Abo’s marriages. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. In the future it would be helpful to others and would avoid unnecessary time wasted on reviewing your edits if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. Repeated disruptive editing can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 23:57, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Another improper deletion
I'm Quaerens-veritatem. I noticed that you again removed content from Patrick Leonard about his marriage to Olivia d'Abo without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summaries. The edits were incorrect and apparently not researched. See, last paragraph of Leonard’s lede and Olivia d’Abo’s marriages. Your edits are apparently vandalism and have been reverted. Further, you have caused unnecessary time wasted on reviewing your edits since you don’t use an edit summary. Repeated disruptive editing results in the loss of editing privileges. Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 02:02, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

March 2024
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:30, 28 March 2024 (UTC)