User talk:Osito321

Welcome!
Hello, Osito321, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Shirt58 (talk) 09:56, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

June 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=614864722 your edit] to Todd Carney may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:01, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Talkback
Mattlore (talk) 04:54, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Bronwyn Bishop image
There's a couple of issues with the image which is why I removed it. Firstly, because the image has been posted on Twitter and published in several newspapers does not make it "public domain" or freely-licensed (see Image use policy for more information on the policy). It will be deleted from Wikimedia Commons eventually because it would most certainly not meet the rules for freely-licensed images: there is no licence information, no source and no permission from the person who took the photo. Secondly, it should not have been included in the infobox which is for a quick summary of information and a photo of the subject. If it was appropriately licensed, it should have been included as a captioned thumbnail image in the body of the text, preferably next to the text about the travel expense issues. --Canley (talk) 00:46, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Gallen
Hi Osito, I see you have added back in "is a self-confessed drug cheat, having admitted in 2014 to...". I have several problems with that sentence;
 * First is there any other type of confession apart from a "self-confession"? If not, then self doesn't need to be there.
 * Secondly, what is the difference between confessed or admitted? They mean the same thing, do they not?
 * Therefore I think the sentence only needs to read either, "confessed in 2014 to..." or "admitted in 2014 to..."
 * Last time we discussed this we ended up settling on "pleaded guilty to the use of performance enhancing drugs in 2014." - Perhaps we should just go back to that? Mattlore (talk) 00:58, 19 July 2016 (UTC)