User talk:OskNe

Welcome!
Hello, OskNe, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Vanjagenije (talk) 14:23, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Sotosbros-related sockpuppetry
Hi, I see you're reverting a number of IPs under the claim that they're this editor engaged in sockpuppetry. Could you explain why you think that is the case here? Mark Arsten (talk) 19:12, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

March 2014
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Arch Rivals. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Closedmouth (talk) 04:57, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Edit warring with Sotosbros
You and Sotosbros need to stop this edit war. &#0187;Petiatil (&#0134; talk &#0135; contribs) 04:58, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I have pointed out the problems in the note. But user:Sotosbros has been forced to edit it rejects dialogue.--OskNe (talk) 05:03, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Arch Rivals, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. &#0187;Petiatil (&#0134; talk &#0135; contribs) 05:33, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Your theory is strange. I have pointed out the problems of the editing of Sotosbros in the note. Sotosbros has been forced to edit without regard to dialogue.
 * In addition, Sotosbros have a block fled in spite of receiving block the IP user 173.55.156.155.--OskNe (talk) 05:45, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Arch Rivals
WP:3RR is a Bright Line. WP:VANDALISM is an exception, but this appears more likely to be a WP:Content dispute. You should stop reverting until this is resolved. Use WP:RFPP or WP:DISPUTE RESOLUTION instead. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 06:30, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
 * He(Sotosbros) does not have it in accordance with the discussion so far. I think that call for discussion to him to be meaningless..--OskNe (talk) 06:38, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
 * For stuff like this, best to use WP:AN3 Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 06:46, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 06:43, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

A page you started (Takeo Okumura) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Takeo Okumura, OskNe!

Wikipedia editor Prof. Mc just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"A great start to the article. Thanks for creating this page."

To reply, leave a comment on Prof. Mc's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)