User talk:Osram123

Speedy deletion of Abbey Dawn.Love Revolution
A tag has been placed on Abbey Dawn.Love Revolution, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

There's no source about this EP, neither in her official site (avrillavigne.com) and her MySpace

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Smanu (talk) 15:04, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of I Was Her, Now I Am...
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article I Was Her, Now I Am..., suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * After a Google search, no indication has been found that the article is true, other than forum speculation and a Wikipedia article in another language.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Unscented (talk) 18:41, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of The Remixes (Avril Lavigne album)
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as The Remixes (Avril Lavigne album), to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 16:10, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

March 2009
Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. TerriersFan (talk) 22:01, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Revival (Avril Lavigne album)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Revival (Avril Lavigne album), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no sources listed, none found. Fails WP:NALBUMS and WP:CRYSTAL

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Wolfer68 (talk) 23:09, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

July 2009
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Adding completely fake chart positions to an album that is still a rumour, let alone noteven been released yet! Mister sparky (talk) 10:46, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

August 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Let Go (Avril Lavigne album) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Pakaran 08:05, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Under My Skin, you will be blocked from editing. -- Darth NormaN (talk) 11:45, 6 August 2009 (UTC)