User talk:OsrcNetwork

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, OsrcNetwork. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:OpenSourceResearch Collaboration, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the edit COI template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see );
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see );
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. TLA tlak 08:11, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2024
 Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because your account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must: To do this, post the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
 * Provide a new username.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:00, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Unblock discussion
You will not be unblocked in the short run to edit about OpenSourceResearch Collaboration, or any other subject with which you are connected, given the promotional nature of your edits and your WP:conflict of interest. Please concisely and clearly describe what non promotional, non conflict of interest edits you would make. Please adjust your unblock request accordingly. &#45;- Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:21, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * You don't need to be unblocked to read relevant guidelines, blocks only prevent editing. 331dot (talk) 09:44, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * It is unlikely that you will be able to write about OpenSourceResearch Collaboration, non promotionally at first. "Experience has unfortunately shown that most (but not all) people with experience in PR cannot be taught to write a proper article, because they are so completely oriented to writing advertisements or quasi-advertisements that they honestly cannot see the difference between that and a proper encyclopedia article." -- User:DGG. You will need therefore to describe what constructive edits you would make to help build the wonder of the world that is Wikipedia. I will add further guidance for you to read. &#45;- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:16, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid can be located here and here, however be aware that this is not an exhaustive list. Pages can sometimes avoid these pitfalls and still be seen as an ad copy or unambiguously promotional, particularly if the editor appears to be a paid editor or has some other conflict of interest. Please review these policies, including the FAQ page on organizations to determine if this applies to you. We've been changing usernames only after other problems have been addressed, so I will defer renaming to my colleague. &#45;- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:19, 28 February 2024 (UTC)