User talk:Ossentoo

Proposed deletion of Information Security Management
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Information Security Management, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * This neologism has no indication of references in reliable sources. The only thing that looks like a reference is a link to "isaca.org", which suggests a commercial conflict of interest. Redundant in any case to information security.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 19:52, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Unbanked
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Unbanked, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Wikipedia is not a collection of essays

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. kelapstick (talk) 23:15, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

January 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Unbanked, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Unbanked was changed by Ossentoo (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-01-27T23:17:34+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 23:17, 27 January 2009 (UTC)