User talk:Ossian511

Speedy deletion of Skull Candy
A tag has been placed on Skull Candy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD G11.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Postoak 03:29, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Re: Skull Candy
Hello, I just deleted the article - not because it was spammy per se, but it was a short article that didn't really make the company sound all that remarkable. As a very very rough guideline, if the article makes people ask "okay, so it's a random company, why should we care?", it's not a good sign. If it is a major company, an article about it should claim so, and back it up with sources. Most companies probably qualify if they've been featured in independent news, publications, etc. You may want to check out WP:CORP. Feel free to recreate it if it satisfies the notability criteria after all. =) --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 09:58, 8 October 2007 (UTC)