User talk:Ostoneo

is test

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Ostoneo for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Jasper Deng (talk) 01:22, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

September 2012
This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. Jasper Deng (talk) 01:30, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Use the sandbox
Stop messing up Jimbo's page. Your edits don't need to be tested there, and your repeated edits look more like vandalism than tests in any case. --Onorem♠Dil 01:31, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

January 2013
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for vandalism and repeated sockpuppetry. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Hut 8.5 19:52, 21 January 2013 (UTC)


 * [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Jimbo_Wales&diff=prev&oldid=534063643 This] is rather self-explanatory. To be unblocked you will have to address that and your use of sockpuppet accounts as detailed above.--Jasper Deng (talk) 20:16, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
 * For the benefit of admins reviewing any future unblock requests the sockpuppet accounts in question are, and . Hut 8.5 22:07, 21 January 2013 (UTC)