User talk:Otd uk

Welcome!
Hello , and Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some good places to get you started: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please be sure to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes to produce your name and the current date, or just three tildes ( ~   ) to produce your name only. If you have any questions, or are worried/confused about anything at all, please either visit the help desk, or leave a new message on my talk page at any time. Happy editing, good luck, and remember: Be Bold! — FireFox • T • 11:40, 5 March 2006
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * Template messages
 * Sandbox

POV Vandalism
If you continue to add your POV to pages and change links as you have done several times on Intelligence Corps then I shall block you. -- Necrothesp 13:20, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Listen and understand, have you ever heard of FREE SPEECH ......... block me? well then maybe I'll make a formal complaint. I don't threaten easy. bye
 * I don't intend blocking you, not least because I can't, but you may want to read WP:NPOV. Additionally, free speech is totally irrelevant here. Wikipedia is a private website, and rights to edit may be withdrawn at any time. Stifle 20:22, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Listen and understand yourself. This is an ENCYCLOPAEDIA, not a soapbox. You may want to look up the difference. We provide factual information, not supposition, allegation, bias and point of view. In addition, deleting links to official websites and replacing them with links to POV websites is considered vandalism. If you want to rant then I suggest you go to one of the many websites devoted to ranting. -- Necrothesp 22:49, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Why don't you wake up and take your head out of your big end! WHAT ARE YOU saying, what experience do you have with the Int Corps?

Factual Information:

1. The Intelligence Corps (FRU) murdered innocent civilians in Northern Ireland.

2. They had and have the backing of the state.

3. The Steven's 3 investigation confirmed that the state was involved in collusion — which resulted in the MURDER of innocent civilians Steven's stated "it gives the impression that the state sanctioned MURDER".

What your doing by removing any reference to the FRU and their crimes is (CENSORSHIP), their illegality are as much part of the Corps history as the inn's and out's of the official history — which makes no mention of their activities in Northern Ireland.

But then I guess your just one of these individuals — who just listen to the official version and ignore the Factual Information and the truth.

I suspect you'd prefer to play the game of being the faithful story teller and only print and publish what you'd like others to believe - seems to me you should be applying for a job at walt disney.

You sound a bit like some fascist or communist state censor at work, than a factual and historical investigator interested in factual information.

Here's a great English word "TRUTH" — do you know what that means?

Unlike you, I live everyday with my loss, the only difference is that I worked for the group (FRU), having paid the highest price for my loyalty.

For this you get to sit at home in a so called FREE country and censor the truth and publish state propaganda, whilst the Factual Information (truth) along with all those innocent lives taken by the state - remain some dirty dark secret — never to be told.

NEITHER YOU OR THE STATE CAN SILENCE THE TRUTH.
 * No, but we can stop you vandalising our website. -- Necrothesp 19:48, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Oh, so its (our) web site? and perhaps you can tell me what act of vandalism I am supposed to have committed.

It is noted that your referring Wikipedia as yours (our) — meaning that you claim some kind of ownership of the site.


 * What, you mean you don't think your previous edit deleting the link to the official Int Corps website and replacing it with a POV link was vandalism? And you think your current effort, adding a link to a website which appears to have nothing to do with Int Corps and includes the reference on the first page to "murderous activities of RUC/PSNI Special Branch agents", isn't POV? You have an odd idea of what is and is not vandalism and/or neutral. Have a read of our policies before you add anything else like this. I claim no ownership of Wikipedia, and never implied I did. But I do follow policy and keep it neutral and free of vandalism. If you are intent on violating this, then you will be blocked. -- Necrothesp 18:19, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Read it! I don't need to read it - here click on this link and read about what is says (http://www.relativesforjustice.com/publications/fru.htm) see that IT SAYS MILITARY INTELLIGENCE (INTELLIGENCECORPS). And don't ever lecture me on the Intelligence Corps ever, I lost my daughter so people like you get to sit on their ends at home publishing official propaganda.
 * That page does not mention the Int Corps once, apart from a reference to one officer belonging to it. The Force Research Unit has its own article on WP. Nobody is interested in publishing either official propaganda (I have actually personally reverted many editors who have done so) or anti-establishment ranting. And I find it interesting that you seem incapable of answering my points about vandalism and POV. I repeat, this is not a soapbox, go and rant on another site. Many of them (such as those you keep adding as links) will welcome your opinion, and your fondness for SHOUTING will probably go down well there. -- Necrothesp 17:30, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Copyright problem
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Intelligence Corps Museum, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.armymuseums.org.uk/amot-search/default.asp?Category=Amot&Service=Museum-Display&reference=0000000048/. As a copyright violation, Intelligence Corps Museum appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Intelligence Corps Museum has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source. If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Intelligence Corps Museum. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Intelligence Corps Museum, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. --Stifle 20:19, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:FrankDoherty3.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:FrankDoherty3.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 07:05, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alhaji Abdoulie Cham


The article Alhaji Abdoulie Cham has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. GeorgeLouis (talk) 06:34, 17 February 2012 (UTC)