User talk:Otolemur crassicaudatus

Re:MTN Italia
They seem to be some sort of marketing firm. ... disco spinster   talk  02:47, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, but I still had to Google it! :) ...  disco spinster   talk  03:01, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Re: Wonderbra
That might work, since I can't find anything else. To be safe though, here's another news source that discusses it. Wizardman 19:20, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Tables
Captions aren't mandatory, as such, but they're generally a good idea so that the reader understands what the table is for. Bearcat (talk) 07:04, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I generally like them better with a title caption whenever possible, but it's ultimately up to editor discretion — there's no requirement either way. As long as the purpose and meaning of the table is explained somehow, just do whatever makes more sense to you — there's no right or wrong. Bearcat (talk) 17:52, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Tables
As far as I can tell, tables are not discussed by the Manual of Style, and the only style guideline merely discusses when tables should and shouldn't be used. Unless I've overlooked something, it's my opinion that there's not any sort of mandatory rule of style to be followed with regard to tables. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 07:06, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Anti-tobacco movement in Nazi Germany
See bot hit on my talk page. Why is that image orphaned? It directly pertains to the article it was in and it illustraties the subject of the article. Critical commentary is not required. Resspond on my talk page. — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 09:54, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Replied.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 11:05, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Bigfoot
It was a vandal ... reverted back to an earlier version. I'm going to look further to see if semi-protection's in order. Blueboy96 12:04, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

African economy
Hi. I've started a full set of templates for each of the African economies at WikiProject Africa/Economy templates. Basically I see them as a good instrastructure to develop each of the economies on wikipedia. It gives us the chance to link case studies on many of the main exports/industries in the country was is very important as a vast proportion of the population is often involved in such industries. See for example Pineapple production in Côte d'Ivoire and how the template is used. Any help you can give on building up the templates with potential articles related to the economy, distributing the templates in the articles linked or filling in the red links for be much appreciated! For instance Template:Economy of Ghana has some notable content already but potentially these templates can be crammed full with articles related to the economy by African country. Regards  ♦ Dr. Blofeld ♦       "Talk"? 16:18, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Ahh lost my longer message to you in a cut and paste mess up. Not sure about Western Sahara as it is connected to Morocco but I think a series on banking or the stock market in each of the African countries is possible - Banking in Uganda etc. If we could develop each one along the lines of Template:Economy of Ghana I think it will start to take shape. It is a lot of work for sure, but it is an area that need covering and an important one at that but will be done gradually and the templates are the first step to connect them together. ♦ Dr. Blofeld ♦      "Talk"? 15:04, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Re: username
Thanks for bringing it to me, I indef'd and left the username tag. You're right, we don't allow "bot" in the username as it could cause confusion. And if it were a new bot account they would've tagged it as such instantly. Also, quick question, why'd you bring it to me? Thanks again. Scarian Call me Pat!  11:13, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I was a bit confused if it will be right to bring this to WP:UAA, so I asked you.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 11:15, 15 August 2008 (UTC)


 * It probably would've been better as those admins over there would be more experienced with dealing with usernames. But it was fine to bring it to me this time :-) Good job. (P.S. I meant, how did you find me?) Scarian Call me Pat!  11:17, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I noticed you while recent change patrolling.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 11:19, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Re: Amitabh Bachchan
I don't know why that IP keep removing that information. That section is very well sourced. If he keep doing i will ask the admins to do something regarding it. Yea you may be right. It is maybe a socks. We can ask admins to look into it?. Should we ask?--SkyWalker (talk) 12:16, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Azerbaijan
That's the source, so it's in the reference section. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 16:41, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Raccoon
That's a good point. I haven't kept abreast of this news story - if you know better than I do then feel free to revert.

On a slight diversion... it's good to talk to the person who is responsible for Wikipedia recognition of "National Cleavage Day"! *grins* Bobo. 09:53, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Williamstown railway station & Dirleton railway station
Just getting to grips with the North Berwick Branch of the North British Railway this morning - initial stup articles being created at present. Further information to follow. Thanks for the prompt. --Stewart (talk) 09:55, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Government of the Netherlands
Sorry, no. I'm working on many other things already. Markussep Talk 12:15, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

National Vagina Day and V-Day
Hello, I am sorry to say that I am not familiar with the subject of V-Day or National Vagina Day but you could always add NVD to the V-Day article, saying "on February 14, V-Day organizes an event in order to inform society of violence against women..." or something like that. Other than that, thats all I can really be of help with. Hope that works out for your question. OOODDD (talk) 06:35, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Translation
Hi there, you wrote: "Hi, can you please translate what is written here below the three separate images". The lower part of the image uploaded by you shows an engraving of famous German medieval painter Albrecht Dürer, titled "Ritter, Tod und Teufel" (to be translated as "The Knight, Death, and the Devil"). The Nazis created a variation of this Dürer engraving title, to be used in their non-smoking campaign: "The Knight against Death and Devil". "Tabak und Krebs" = "Tobacco and cancer". The lobster (crab) on the upper image fits because the German word "Krebs" can mean "cancer" or "crab". "Propaganda Musika" = "propaganda with music" (Musika is a poetic variation of the word Musik - music). "So appetitlich frisch" (written with long s where appropriate) means "so appetizingly fresh".--Ratzer (talk) 09:28, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Gefährlich leben = living dangerously
 * translation of the part between: Dürer's famous engraving "The Knight, Death, and the Devil" praises the heroic human, who in constant contact with death strongly clings to live, and leads the demon in his own chest into the fight against a world full of devils."
 * Bereitsein ist alles = to be ready (for something) is everything

Re: National Vagina Day and V-Day
The articles do seem different. There should be a dab page titled V-Day (disambiguation) to sort this out. Does that help? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 16:48, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Like you said, there's no reference to National Vagina Day on V-Day so it's probably a different event. Either that or for some reason it wasn't written in the article. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 16:55, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm just as unsure as you are. Well, why not ask WP:HOLIDAY? They might express a few thoughts. Sorry if I couldn't be of more help. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 17:09, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Re:Australia-plant-stub
Hi OC - for future reference, stub templates and categories should be taken to WP:SFD for discussion and/or deletion, not to WP:TFD and WP:CFD. If this one had been, chances are it would have been deleted - you are right that stub types for plants aren't split on a by-country basis, they are always split by taxon, and indeed there is a large hierarchy of such stub types already in existence. The stub type is currently listed at WikiProject Stub sorting/Discoveries, where just those points have been made (this page is used as a half-way stage before deciding whether an unproposed stub type is adopted or sent to SFD). Feel free to make any comments you wish to there. Grutness...wha?  00:48, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

FPC
Hello. Generally I like this image, and think it meets the criteria needed for nomination. You know, always users who will oppose the promotion to the FP will appear, but you can nominate it surely. Some objections might target the resolution of this image, generally FPs tend to be larger. - Darwinek (talk) 13:08, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Shahumyan
There must have been a poultry factory there at least. I think the town was set up as just a factory with barracks for the workers, but apparently it's a separate municipality. I don't think the factory still works, on Google Maps it looks like most of it has been demolished. But the houses are still there. The Jrarati trchnafabrika looks a lot better. Markussep Talk 09:13, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

DYK
Thank you for your contributions! - Mailer Diablo 19:24, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Image
I wish I knew the answer, but I don't know a whole lot about copyright. Try asking Zscout370 or maybe Carnildo, they might be able to help you out. Khoikhoi 20:26, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Re: FA/Image
Per the FA critera:
 * Images. It has images and other media where appropriate, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly.

So, yeah, in general there should be at lease some images, but the number and type will depend on the article. -- Vary | Talk 15:29, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't really know. It definitely depends on the circumstances, but it might be an idea to bring it up at Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates; I'm sure someone there will either be able to tell you if a given topic is one that might not need images, or give you some suggestions on what to add or what you should look for in an image. FA discussions don't give much weight to concerns that aren't 'actionable', so if there genuinely are no image possibilities for an otherwise FA-worthy article, I would imagine - not being an FA reviewer myself - that the article would probably pass.  But you'll probably get a better answer at the FAC talk page.  -- Vary | Talk 15:38, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Nazi anti-tobacco images
I am flattered that you contacted me over this, but I doubt I can be of much help, since my knowlege of image protocols is non-existent - I am frequently in trouble over my image choices, constantly having to delete, etc. For what it's worth, in my opinion your first image is central to the article and should be retained if at all possible. The second is less essential and the article wouldn't suffer much fron its loss. I see from the talkpage that you have heavyweights such as Awadewit and Elcobbola in on the discussion, and I would be much guided by them. Hope this helps (though I doubt it does - sorry). Brianboulton (talk) 16:58, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

I imagine that the copyright would be similar to this one here. --Polylerus (talk) 01:23, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

table question
I'm crap at doing tables-- you should ask someone else! Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:36, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Tables
Hi! I am not expert regarding tables, unfortunately. However, I found http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Table_demo which should help answer your question WhisperToMe (talk) 03:56, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Reliable source
The machine-translated page definitely isn't reliable, since it's virtually impossible to understand :-) Foreign language pages can be suitable as reliable sources, but sorry to say I can't help you, as I don't understand (1) the German original, or (2) the machine-translated English.  You'll have to ask someone who knows German.  Nyttend (talk) 04:28, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

List of Wikipedians by featured article nominations
Yes, it is updated by. More info at Wikipedia talk:List of Wikipedians by featured article nominations. Cheers, Cirt (talk) 21:08, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

re: Tool
Hi, I have replied. ~ Ame I iorate U T C @ 08:53, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

re:Rita Hosking notability
an editor felt that the article didn't sufficiently show that she passed the music/band guideline. I was going to remove it a bit later today. A larger issue that I've come across in preparing that article is the woeful state of many articles on Americana (music). If you have some time, please work on a few! --Rocksanddirt (talk) 17:02, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * in addition, since I created the article, it would be better if someone else removed it. --Rocksanddirt (talk) 17:10, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * yeah, that's another reason that I've not removed it. Most of the larger newspaper info is in 'newsbank archives' and I've not had a chance to log in through my county library system to see those full articles.  I guess it comes down to if playing around the country is notable enough.  --Rocksanddirt (talk) 17:27, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Crime in Israel
My only concern about your edit is that it reads "Jewish Terrorism" and then "Palestinian Political Violence". Either Jewish Terrorism should be merged into "Jewish Political Violence" or "Palestinian Political Violence" should be moved to "Palestinian Terrorism." Besides that, I don't see a big problem with its inclusion. If it were included, I would rather see the article be reorganized such that there is a section on organized crime, a section on general crime, and then a section on terrorism/political violence. That sort of reorganization should probably happen anyways. Tiger Khan (talk) 18:05, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Congrats!
Just noticed that Anti-tobacco movement in Nazi Germany, an article written by you attained FA status. Congratulations! Keep it going! --KnowledgeHegemonyPart2 13:38, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

done
Victuallers (talk) 11:19, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

DYK

 * Oops, sorry, must have inadvertently skipped over your name when I was handing out the credits. Gatoclass (talk) 04:52, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Sandleman
They quite possibly can be the same person, but as they have stopped their disruptive editing, I think we can let it go. If they vandalise further on the account, they will be blocked. – Skyezx  message  01:53, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Child abuse image
Hi

I removed the image you added to Child abuse, but my edit summary was too quick and short, so I thought I'd say hello and explain.

The image was a photo of the result of general violence; although a child was hurt, it does not illustrate the topic of child abuse, it illustrates war or rioting.

But more importantly, I think the topic of child abuse is too broad to be depicted with an image; by using an image it can distract, or divert the attention from the important concepts in the text, lots of which can't be shown because they are psychological/emotional/developmental, etc.

Maybe you don't agree, but I wanted to offer my thoughts on it beyond a cursory edit summary,.

Have a good one...

--Jack-A-Roe (talk) 04:57, 4 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia is an illustrated work, so a picture/pictures is/are appropriate. No view on this particular image.  Ty  11:34, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Request opinion on Orissa communal violence
You once mentioned that I could request you for help. Could you please help me deal with the appropriateness of deleting External links on Orissa communal violence. I have put a lot of effort to find RS. However, it is becoming a challenge. Your inputs and guidance would be much appreciated. Also, could you please put this page in your watch list for the next4 weeks? Recordfreenow (talk) 20:13, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I just responded to the image statement on my talk. Thanks for your guidance. I am trying to be as reasonable as possible. Recordfreenow (talk) 07:57, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Girl sufferedwithburnwounds.jpg
You posted on my talk page. Did you mean to do that? I can't see any speedy delete tag. It's a Commons image, so any deletion will be there.  Ty  11:33, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * It was tagged as lacking a source, it now has a source, so there's no immeadiate possibility of deletion. The source's copyright is really unclear, though, and probably not strictly acceptable.  Notably, images used here need to be both modifiable and commercially useable, it's not clear that it what is meant.  Your best bet is to ask them if they'll license it for both, under either the GDFL or a creative commons (though not a noncommercial or no modifications one) (see http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/COM:LICENSING for acceptable licenses. and have them confirm this to permissions-en@wikimedia.org (see WP:OTRS). Wily D  13:03, 5 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks I have posted a request on CT:L. I think I will get it sorted out. Your help and efforts are appeciated. Recordfreenow (talk) 18:42, 5 September 2008 (UTC)


 * FYI... All steps were completed. We have received the permission for the image(s) and OTRS has made the necessary

modifications to the Image page(s). Recordfreenow (talk) 10:42, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! Made some changes. Recordfreenow (talk) 12:23, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Vote Stacking by kashmir cloud
could you please look into kashmir clouds edit history as he is blatantly vote stacking to gain votes from indian editors to keep the POK page i dont know how to deal with canvassing so could you help? 86.158.235.148 (talk) 13:21, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

User talk:Sdhsakjhdk
Hopefully you realized you gave him 3 different warnings and reported him to AIV all after his last edit. ;)  jj137  (  talk )  18:19, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I did not understand what you are saying?  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 18:21, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
 * You gave him a 3rd warning, a last warning, and an only warning (and then reported him to AIV) when he had stopped editing.  jj137  (  talk )  18:26, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Oops, my mistake, he kept editing, but hadn't edited any more at the time.  jj137  (  talk )  18:28, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I issued him three warnings for the three different pages he vandalized. I did not report him to the AIV, but I was about to report him if he vandalized any article again after the only warning. But he is already blocked.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 18:32, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
 * OK, sorry for the misunderstanding. I wasn't sure about it. (and I misread the AIV report.) Bad mistake on my part.  jj137  (  talk )  18:32, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Persecution of Atheists
I've recommended that this article be merged into Discrimination against atheists. I've started a discussion here if you want to add something.  Azure Fury  (talk | contribs) 01:43, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

La Princesse
I'll take it out if its not appropriate - I wasn't sure if Cat:spiders was deathly serious for biological specimens only, or if it allowed any kind of spider, artistic depictions of and that sort of thing. I guess its the former!! Roisterdoister (talk) 08:49, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Kristina Keneally
I specifically did not add in a reference to my edit as a fact like this is easily checked against official sources, such as the NSW government website. I am a wikipedian whose personal style is one of resisting over-referencing as otherwise all articles will become awkward to read and cumbersome. However I do favour referencing where the statement in question may be controversial or is otherwise subject to conjecture (not the case here).

However if you would like to add in your own references to this article regarding the elevation of Ms Keneally to a new portfolio, I point you in the direction of this article in the SMH or Keneally's webpage on the official NSW government website. Kind regards-- Cala braxthis  (talk) 11:06, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Maldives
It would depend what you're trying to source. If it's a very general statement, then it's probably okay — but if it's a more complicated statement that delves into actual crime stats, then you'd probably be better off tracking down the sources that Lonely Planet used. Bearcat (talk) 07:00, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Preface it with "According to Lonely Planet, pickpocketing is..." Bearcat (talk) 07:07, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Orissa communal violence
Can you please look at this[request] and suggest or validate? Recordfreenow (talk) 11:44, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks my friend for supporting on semi protection. I don't know you but it is terribly tough to find people to discuss and communicate on Wikipedia. It appears to be a mad rush. No one bothers to ask questions or correct you. Everyone wants to have their own POV. I am afraid I may also be behaving similarly. I don't even know if it is worth it to contribute anymore. I just came from a meeting where we were actually seeking Him to show us how to rehabilitate 120 destiture women that were saved from temple prostitution. And the thought came to my mind about the aggressive editors and whether they would even care to enter their hands into this dirt and getting involved with restoring broken lives. I am not sure. I am sorry to vent on you but I may not be able to carry forward with reporting and providing much inputs to this article anymore. I will try but cannot be sure. there does not appear to be any sense in it. I guess I am losing inspiration. Do you think it is worth it? Keep up the good work on your contributions. I appreciate your desire to act fairly and in a non-partisan manner. Recordfreenow (talk) 17:51, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Quarter Century...

 * Good job on this! While we all have had our disagreements, I think we can both agree that you've done an excellant job here. Congrats! Your friend Eddy of the wiki[citation needed] 20:58, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Conflict at Orissa religious violence & Jobxavier
Otolemur, I seek council & perhaps assistance. As you may have noticed there is a bit of an edit war at Orissa religious violence- I've been fighting to keep pro-Hindutva POV out of the article, and User:Bharatveer and User:Jobxavier have been repeatedly reinserting it (and finding new POV bits to insert). Jobxavier is the worst offender, and, to be frank, his conduct leads me to desire to bring a RfC regarding him. You're more experienced than I, so I was wondering if firstly, you think this is the appropriate action; secondly, what to do about the requirement in Requests_for_comment that "at least two editors must have contacted the user on their talk page, or the talk pages involved in the dispute, and tried but failed to resolve the problem"? I mean to say, I've contacted him; to a lesser extent User:vvarkey has contacted him, but with no difference to his conduct; moreover, how does one try to resolve the problem when, in essence, he just needs to stop? I guess my question is, has enough been done to satisfy this requirement as of yet, or do additional steps need to be taken? Finally, if you agree with the above, and if you're familiar with RfCs, would you care to help me out with this? Best regards, Gabrielthursday (talk) 08:48, 17 September 2008 (UTC)


 * My name was added to the conflict resolution area [here]. Is this the right place to be? I seek your counsel. As always :). Recordfreenow (talk) 03:32, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Response in mediation
Otolemur, I made a response in mediation [here]. I hope I am being fair. Thanks. Recordfreenow (talk) 06:56, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Dragon Bridge images
Looking over whats there...

All 3 images are fine from the stand point of free use.

I'd leave the infobox one alone, since it's of the bridge proper.

As for the dragons...

I'd move Dragon Bridge.jpg (the detail of just the dragon) to the left side (so the dragon faces into the article) and just under the "Architecture" header. That section seems to be the primary place where the inclusion of the statues as a design element should be discussed.

And I'd lose Image:Zmajski most-Ljubljana.JPG. I'ts a good image, but unless there is a discussion about the design on the bulwark, it's redundant to the sculpture image. And it won;t be lost since it looks like it's included in the Commons gallery.

Hope that helps,

- J Greb (talk) 16:50, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Anti-Christian violence
I notice that you created this which was later merged. In light of recent incidents in India, such as this and this, do you think that we need to genuinely restore it?. --Googlean (talk) 04:32, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I have restored it and requesting your valuable contribs there. --Googlean (talk) 05:12, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Article nominated for deletion
I've just nominated List of United States journalism scandals for deletion. I don't see the point of two articles giving the same information. Redddogg (talk) 19:43, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Soapbox
The reason there is soapboxing on the Masonic ritual AfD is because there is no difference in the material in this article from the material in the Freemasonry article aside from the Christian controversy section. Therefore, the article was broken out specifically to add this criticism, which is already addressed in multiple other articles (and of the six sources used, three are in that one section). That makes it a negative advocacy problem, which is especially egregious because the criticisms leveled are generic and have nothing to do with anything in the article itself. MSJapan (talk) 13:58, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Another advise on Orissa, should it go to WP:AC
I am tired again and wanting to give up. Do you think WP:AC is the best option? Also, should I be the one to do it? I really feel bad asking bothering you again. Thanks. Recordfreenow (talk) 17:15, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Eaglehawk
Eaglehawk was a mining boom town in the 1850's (the Victorian gold rush) but is now basically a commuter and service suburb (in the Australian sense) of the nearby regional city of Bendigo, Victoria. The former Borough of Eaglehawk was amalgamated with the City of Bendigo, and some other municipalities in the area to become the City of Greater Bendigo. The amalgamation was very unpopular with Eaglehawk residents. Some pictures of the Eaglehawk area can be seen at Eaglehawk, Victoria. Cheers, Mattinbgn\talk 23:09, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Tim Conboy
At what area do you inquire about a reliable source for the article? All I did was add more info on his playing career per hockeydb.com, as I would do to any player bio with just two or three lines in it, just to expand it a little bit. Raphie (talk) 16:02, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Severed
Thanks for the vote of confidence at the AfD.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 07:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Recent AfD on Christianity and Judaism
Hi! I see that you were one of the participants in the recent AfD on the article Christianity and Judaism. That AfD recommended (in a snowball result) that the article be merged into Judeo-Christian. However, since the AfD concerns have been raised, most notably
 * Per WP:ADJECTIVE and WP:MOSNAME, we use nouns and noun-phrases for article titles, not adjectives. So a general survey on the relationships between Christianity and Judaism (a topic this encyclopedia should certainly cover) should be called Christianity and Judaism, as per the articles Christianity and Islam, Islam and Judaism.
 * The reason the article Judeo-Christian exists, as its own hatnote declares, is specifically to survey the history and use of that word-phrase -- which has its own controversy, and its own tale to tell. (See here where I've set things out in a bit more detail.)  That story is a good fit for its own article, and will get completely lost if the contents of Christianity and Judaism get inappropriately dumped on top of it.

Having contacted the closing admin, his advice was to open a new discussion at Talk:Christianity and Judaism, advertise the discussion widely, and if a new consensus can be reached in that discussion [his emphasis], then per WP:CCC the new consensus should be followed, rather than the AfD decision, without the need for a DRV or a new AfD.

Concerns about the proposed merge have also been expressed by, and.

This post is therefore to let you know that that discussion is underway, at Talk:Christianity and Judaism, with a view to perhaps setting aside the AfD decision.

Of course, some significant issues were raised in the AfD about the article in its present form, so the best way forward is a question that needs some thought. Please feel welcome to come and participate! Jheald (talk) 07:50, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of traps in the Saw film series
An article that you have been involved in editing, List of traps in the Saw film series, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/List of traps in the Saw film series (2nd nomination). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? CyberGhostface (talk) 15:06, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Request comment
Issues on a term in some articles you have been involved in editing here, if you are interested to participate in the discussion, please join. Thanks. -- <font style="color:#1849B5;background:yellow;">Googlean <font style="color:#000000;background:white;"> Results  02:01, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Re:
Sorry, I meant to rename it to May 1998 Afghanistan earthquake, but perhaps it's fine as is. &mdash;<font color="#000000">Ceran <font color="#000000">(sing / <font color="#000000">see) 13:26, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Dab talk pages
Just add to the talk pages. ~ the editorofthewiki  ( talk / contribs / editor review ) ~ 16:10, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

re: further readings
"Websites and online publications are normally listed in the "External links" section instead of in this section, although editors occasionally prefer to merge very short lists of publications and external links into this section." All the readings were were to online publications. Anyway, let's move it to the talk page, easier there. Lihaas (talk) 09:39, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

socio-economic problems in india
Just dropped in to say good work on this article. You have significantly improved the article started yesterday by me. --<font color="red" face="cursive">GP <font color="black" face="cursive">Pande  talk!  11:58, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 12:02, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mick Brown (journalist)
I added four reviews to Mick Brown (journalist). You may want to revisit Articles for deletion/Mick Brown (journalist). See also -- Eastmain (talk) 21:46, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Vandal Warning


Block him, please. I reverted his change, and saw you had left a warning on his talk page.Yachtsman1 (talk) 06:56, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Bravo, well done!! Bit of a one track mind on that particular issue, don't you think?--Yachtsman1 (talk) 07:29, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thank you for reverting vandalism to my userpage. Today was the first time I met you during reverting vandalism, and I must say you're pretty fast :) You beat me to it several times. Have a cookie. <div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">

 C h a m a l  talk has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

 C h a m a l  talk 08:00, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, sure. Thanks!  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 08:10, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Sorry
Sorry for the vandilisim. I got confused. I tryed to edit the previous vandalisim and i must have accidently red did it. I am VERY sorry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Irunongames (talk • contribs) 01:10, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Kaltio
"Kaltio is a main Finnish magazine cultural magazine." Right. So what issue, what page number, where is the online reference? Why not just say that you saw it on TV? A reference should include enough information for other editors to easily verify your content in ENGLISH. Your references did not do this. Bob98133 (talk) 13:15, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok, I agree we should avoid this reference for controversial statements.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 13:24, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Anti-tobacco movement in Nazi Germany
Sorry about that... I'll make sure to keep an eye out next time. Thank you.    Sintaku  Talk 16:22, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Anti-tobacco movement in Nazi Germany
No problem. I really enjoyed the article by the way, keep up the good work! --Winterus (talk) 17:50, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Criteria for Category:Pseudoscience
Hi, just wanted to let you know I reverted two of your edits that added category:pseudoscience to acupuncture and alternative medicine, respectively. Although good arguments exist that aspects of both topics are pseudoscientific, WP requires a particular threshold for using the pseudoscience category, per the ArbCom decision that is now part of NPOV (shortcut: WP:PSCI), as well as WP:RS. Specifically, we need a V RS showing that a given topic is "generally considered pseudoscience by the scientific community". Examples of such sources include statements by official scientific bodies such as those found at List of scientific societies rejecting intelligent design. regards, Jim Butler (t) 23:39, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Tags on Human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran
I've gone through Human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran and made a lot of changes so that hopefully the can be removed. --BoogaLouie (talk) 00:03, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: Hindu Taliban
Your DYK nomination was accepted and I moved it into the queue to be featured on the main page. &mdash;Politizer talk / contribs 06:01, 14 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Please check the Next Update page and the queues within it before you re-nominate articles; your nomination passed AfD this morning and was moved back into the queue immediately after the nomination was pass. Nominations are never simply deleted from DYK (in fact, there is an unwritten rule that the same user is not allowed to both reject a nomination and delete it&mdash;if a nomination has been rejected, it must be deleted by a different reviewer to ensure that at least two people have considered it); any time you see that your nomination is gone, you need to check the Next Update before assuming it has been deleted.  If there was a green or gray check mark next to it before it was deleted, that means it was accepted and will have been moved into the queue. &mdash;Politizer talk / contribs 15:28, 14 November 2008 (UTC)


 * No worries; we recently changed the DYK process, thanks to the creation by Ameliorate of a new bot to automate DYK postings. So things are a little different now than what you may have been used to, and the discussions about the new process are pretty much buried deep in WT:DYK.  In retrospect, it probably would have been wise for us to post a prominent notice on the DYK nominations page to let nominators know about the new process, since a lot of people are regular nominators but don't pay watch the other discussion page. &mdash;Politizer talk / contribs 15:37, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Archiving assistance
Hi Otolemur. :) Would it be alright if I setup an archive bot for your talkpage?  I noticed that the page is very long, over 160K, and some people's browsers start having trouble with anything over 32K.  But I could setup a bot which would automatically archive any threads which had been inactive for awhile, and then you wouldn't have to worry about it anymore?  Let me know, --Elonka 17:14, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Really?
Wow! I haven't formatted my page much. But well, if you really like it then it simply great. Thanks! --KnowledgeHegemonyPart2 07:08, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Comments on article you were involved in AFD debate
Hi there! You had participated in the AFD on Sikh Extremism. I've had some time to look into the article and commented on the talk page here. Thanks, --<em style="font-family:pristina;color:;font-size:16px">Road <em style="font-family:pristina;color:goldenrod;font-size:16px">Ahead  <em style="color:">=Discuss= 01:00, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Hi there. Sir my article named "Property Standard" has been deleted

19:42, 21 November 2008 Hut 8.5 (Talk | contribs) deleted "Property Standard" ‎ (G11: Blatant advertising)

But sir this is not kind of any advertisement and i am trying to expand Wikiepdia with my knowledge as Property Standard is a magazine IN pakistan Lahore and i gave the reference of thier website aswell, I am sure people would benfit from what i wrote about this magazine, I will be gratefl if you Put the article back on. Regards, Shahzad shehzirules@yahoo.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shehzi123 (talk • contribs) 10:35, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Welcome back...

 * :) -- <em style="font-family:Kristen ITC;color:#ff0000"> Tinu  <em style="font-family:Kristen ITC;color:#ff0000">Cherian  - 11:25, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Re:Boys in Red accident
Hi just a little answer to your question. Boys in Red was coined by numerous new organisations after the accident in reference to the players killed in the accident. A fund titled Boys in Red Fund was also settup following the accident in order to raise money for memorials to those killed. I figured since The Boys in Red seemed to be an almost universally accepted name for the accident in Canada that it seemed suitable as an article title on Wikipedia. Do you have suggestions for a better name? :) --Kuzwa (talk) 23:20, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

cold fusion and pseudoscience
See Talk:Cold_fusion/Archive_17 --Enric Naval (talk) 23:59, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Sorry
Hello there. A few weeks back, you made what I felt was an insensitive reply to a post on the RefDesk and I replied to you with some rather impolite remarks of my own. In the time since then I've come to realize that while your reply might have been a little brusque, mine was extremely rude and completely uncalled for. I have also seen your many knowledgeable replies to other questions and I realize that I could have driven off a valuable contributor with a hasty edit of ill-chosen words. Frankly, I'm a little embarrassed by my outburst; I normally try to conduct myself with a little more decorum. Please accept my apologies. Matt Deres (talk) 02:50, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok, no problem. Thanks.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 07:35, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Mozilla Firefox
Hello

Read this to get a better idea how they make money:

http://calacanis.com/2006/03/06/firefox-mozilla-corporation-mozilla-foundation-made-72m-last/

Have a good day!

--Grandscribe (talk) 08:39, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Slum and Shanty town
Hi, keep an eye on these two articles will you. The anonymous user 60.50.67.78 has been adding repetitive statements and sometimes dubious links (a travel review site to the Shanty town article referring to the largest slum, which in my view is not a credible source). I think if the anonymous user keeps on editing like this, warnings should perhaps be filed.--TheLeopard (talk) 11:38, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

An article you created is about to be deleted: Tools which can help you
The article you created, Half_to_Death is about to be deleted from Wikipedia.

There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here:
 * Articles for deletion/Half_to_Death.

The faster your respond, the better chance the article you created can be saved. This is because deletion debates only stay open for a few days, and the first comments are usually the most important. There are several tools and other editors who can help you keep the page from being deleted forever:
 * 1) You can list the page up for deletion on Article Rescue Squadron. If you need help listing your page, add a comment on the Article Rescue Squadron talk page.
 * 2) You can request a mentor to help explain to you all of the complex rules that editors use to get a page deleted, here: Adopt-a-User. But don't wait for a mentor to respond on the deletion page.
 * 3) When try to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of rule acronyms. Don't let these acronyms intimidate you. Here is a list of your own acronyms you can use yourself: WP:Deletion debate acronyms which may support the page you created being kept. Acronyms in deletion debates are sometimes incorrectly used, or ignore rules or exceptions.
 * 4) You can merge the article into a larger article.

If your page is deleted, you still have many options available. Good luck! travb (talk) 18:34, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Fort Dearborn move
The Fort Dearborn article was moved yesterday without discussion. I've put out a request to have it moved back to its original location. As you've edited the Fort Dearborn article in the passed, please weigh in on the discussion on the current Fort Dearborn talk page. Shsilver (talk) 13:03, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Acadieville merge
Hi, longtime since we spoke, hope you've been well. There's a merger proposal at Talk:Acadieville Parish, New Brunswick re an article that you created. Your input would be welcome.  Were <font color="FFA500">Spiel <font color="FFC0CB">Chequers  22:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Little context in Category:Cities, towns and villages in Cape Verde
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Cities, towns and villages in Cape Verde, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Cities, towns and villages in Cape Verde is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Cities, towns and villages in Cape Verde, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 04:29, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Labor / Worker's Rights project
I recently drafted a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals#Wikiproject_Workers_Rights_.26_Labor. proposal for a Worker's Rights & Labor Issues WikiProject] ... I thought you might be interested, since you are working on the Anarchism project ...

Cheers! Jrtayloriv (talk) 05:22, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Victims of political repression by country
Category:Victims of political repression by country,, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 21:59, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * This CFD also covers all sub-cats, including, which you created. Cgingold (talk) 22:01, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of of Category:Americans accused of spying for the Russian Federation
A tag has been placed on Category:Americans accused of spying for the Russian Federation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Violates WP:G10 as accusations only disparage the subject; consensus has shown to delete these categories, as shown here

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. —  Σ xplicit  04:54, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Victims of American political repression
I have nominated victims of american political repression for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:32, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Earthquakes Project Newsletter
The WikiProject Earthquakes newsletter for September 2009 has been released. Be sure to check on our status.  ceran  thor 11:47, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Inactive
Hello. After a recent reoganization of WikiProject Volcanoes, we have established an "inactive" list. As your account has not edited for over 4 months, I am sorry to imform you that you're being moved to the list. If you wish to refute this and are indeed active, I am sorry for the mistake and you can revert my action. Thank you and happy holidays, <span style="font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica"><b style="color:black;">Res</b> Mar 14:02, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Category:Human experimentation in the United States
As the creator of this category, you may be interested in Talk:Human_subject_research.

Global Network for the Forecasting of Earthquakes
Hi Otolemur.This article have been kept.And now nominated again Articles for deletion.Some users demonstrate preconceived opinion.If you have time, could you take a look at the Global Network for the Forecasting of Earthquakes.I'd appreciate a second opinion.Thanks.--Earth Defender (talk) 11:24, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Hindu fascist for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Hindu fascist, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hindu fascist until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  12:02, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject New page
As you may know, the project is inactive, but I just joined. I thought that we should verify that each member is active. If you want to keep being in this wikiproject, please write " " here; if you do not do it before <tt>19:17, 11 June 2011 (UTC)</tt>, you will be removed from the list. All the users that were removed will be put onto this page. Thank you,

Speedy deletion nomination of Pirito Purush Pati Parishad


A tag has been placed on Pirito Purush Pati Parishad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Kevin (talk) 05:14, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Science fiction film of India


The article Science fiction film of India has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * '''"Science fiction film of India". It refers to a genre of films, which are not very popular in the country. The article has no sources saying that these are the only films ever made. In fact, a category or a template would be a much better option than keep an article, as some films have not received much of a notice and some have. If anyone wants to highlight the fact that xXx is a science fiction film, all they have to do is add the category or template to it. To put it short, this article has no significance to highlight a specific genre of films.

This can be redirected to Cinema of India, for an option an article about Indian cinema, which might have space for some of the content this one shows.'''

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. <font face="Comic Sans MS"> X.One   SOS  13:23, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Hindu Taliban for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hindu Taliban is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hindu Taliban & until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Darkness Shines (talk) 17:43, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Hindu Taliban for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hindu Taliban is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hindu Taliban & until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Darkness Shines (talk) 09:02, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

WP:FOUR RFC
There are two WP:RFCs at WP:FOUR. The first is to conflate issues so as to keep people from expressing meaningful opinions. The second, by me, is claimed to be less than neutral by proponents of the first. Please look at the second one, which I think is much better.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 07:18, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Category:Rapists by nationality
Category:Rapists by nationality, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 15:43, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Otolemur crassicaudatus/Hindu Taliban
User:Otolemur crassicaudatus/Hindu Taliban, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Otolemur crassicaudatus/Hindu Taliban and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Otolemur crassicaudatus/Hindu Taliban during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Category:Religious violence in India has been nominated for discussion
Category:Religious violence in India, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shyamsunder (talk) 21:31, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Category:Religious violence in India has been nominated for discussion
Category:Religious violence in India, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shyamsunder (talk) 07:12, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Category:The Hitcher has been nominated for deletion
Category:The Hitcher has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 00:34, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Category:Wrong Turn films has been nominated for renaming
Category:Wrong Turn films has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 10:40, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Otolemur crassicaudatus/Userboxes/AF
User:Otolemur crassicaudatus/Userboxes/AF, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Otolemur crassicaudatus/Userboxes/AF and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Otolemur crassicaudatus/Userboxes/AF during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Chess (talk) (please use&#32; on reply) 23:37, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Otolemur crassicaudatus/Userboxes/RAAN
User:Otolemur crassicaudatus/Userboxes/RAAN, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Otolemur crassicaudatus/Userboxes/RAAN and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Otolemur crassicaudatus/Userboxes/RAAN during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Chess (talk) (please use&#32; on reply) 00:22, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Category:Money launderers by nationality has been nominated for renaming
Category:Money launderers by nationality has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 22:27, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

CfD nomination at
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at  on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkl talk  18:33, 22 November 2023 (UTC)