User talk:Otolemur crassicaudatus/Archive 3

Re: Hurricane Danny (2003)
All I did to the page was to add the assessed=yes parameter to the hurricane template, while keeping the existing importance and quality ratings (unless I screwed up somehow, in which case, you can feel free to change back to the previous ratings). Tito xd (?!? - cool stuff) 07:57, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Uploading an image
Hi, thought I would write the image instructions for future reference:

Best, PeterSymonds | talk  08:08, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Click "upload file", located in the toolbar marked "toolbox" on the left hand side, below the search box.
 * You will see a list of possible licenses for the image. Click one. You will be given instructions about what is/is not acceptable under the image use policy.
 * Below that, there is the upload form. The first box is "source filename", which is the name of the image on your computer. Click browse, open the image, and the full URL to your documents will appear.
 * By default, the image filename will be the same as the source's filename. Do not use default filenames. For example, if you had a picture of Britney Spears called, rename it to  . If renaming, remember to keep the file extension, eg. the.
 * Fill in the licensing information. You need a full source, ie. the full URL; the book title and page number if it's a scan, etc. Please read through the fair use rationale guidelines for further instructions. You must use a fair use image in at least one article.
 * Click "upload this file".


 * No probs. :) PeterSymonds | talk  08:38, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Philippine Air Force
I'm not the primary contributor, though I do admit I've had to revert a LOT of additions by anonymous users who've been adding hoaxes. Some sections are updated, but unfortunately, getting reliable and updated published sources is a bit difficult. The forum often used as a reference is frequented by active and reserve members of the Armed Forces, so sometimes the only way to get reliable news is through them. Will fill in details from published sources as they become available though. --Edward Sandstig (talk) 19:14, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Carmel Charles
Very close to Start class. Not really a stub, no. -- Longhair\talk 02:41, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Airline Sex Discrimination
Hi, just wanted to say thanks for your work on the article and in particular your contributions to the deletion discussion - it is confusing when people just quote some strange rule without actually explaining their position.

There seems to be a small minority who wish to see this policy hidden away (other people have tried to remove mentions of it from the actual pages of the airlines too), and as you've seen others question clear facts such as whether it is even sex discrimination. I've put a lot of work into the article and it is frustrating to see people trying to erase it solely because they don't like references to discrimination against men. Anyway keep up the good work. --Shakehandsman (talk) 16:01, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: Farmingdale (LIRR station)
What "inline citations" are you referring to? DanTD (talk) 01:44, 13 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Would you mind telling me what's so wrong with the source that's there now? And why exactly did you pick this article? DanTD (talk) 01:58, 13 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Fair enough. I'll add what I can get, but I'll have to do it tomorrow, because I'm planning to go off-line tonight. DanTD (talk) 02:19, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Ninjutsu
I have just completed the talk page section on it I feel that as a seperate article the level of detail could be great enough to allow the various schools a section and mention the inter-connectedness of them right now is a hash of adverts claims and counter claims. Some of which coudl be cleared up with more room an it would allow the main article to get back to the art (regardless of who is or isn't legit) and discussing that. Sorry it that was ranty, I have my own views on ninja legitimacy but have been trying to referee two POV pushers and stay neutral. (I may have failed in places) --Nate1481(t/c) 10:11, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

My RfA
Hi O. c., I wanted to say thank you for supporting my request for adminship, which passed with 100 supports, 0 opposes and 1 neutral. I wanted to get round everybody individually, even though it's considered by some to be spam (which... I suppose it is! but anyway. :)). It means a lot to me that the community has placed its trust in my ability to use the extra buttons, and I only hope I can live up to its expectations. If you need anything, or notice something that bothers you, don't hesitate to let me know. Thanks again, PeterSymonds | talk  23:18, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Sean Costello
Because he has been dead for one month already. Tags do not remain forever. WWGB (talk) 00:52, 14 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Well, so what exactly meant by "recent", one week?  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 00:55, 14 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I don't think there is any policy or guideline on this. I guess the tag no longer serves a purpose when the content of the article stops changing frequently, or when the deceased person is no longer in the media. WWGB (talk) 01:51, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

List of Byzantine Emperors
Removed duplicates as requested, at least from the top to the 9th century ones. Haven't checked the others yet. Dimadick (talk) 09:29, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

RE:German WWII aces
Frankly, I believe it is arbitrary. You cannot put all of the images on there, so I believe the Main editor simply plucked a few of the images and put them in the list. You will have to ask them. Personally, I don't see the issue, is there a particular concern you have? Woody (talk) 10:51, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks for the clarification.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 10:57, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Spam
Re: Spam in West Mifflin, Pennsylvania. See the user contributions of the editor who added it. This is a WP:SPA trying to promote a wiki. -- Mwanner | Talk 11:03, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Sorry
You are very obviously not a bot. I had assumed without much thought that the speed of the message after the edit meant that it was driven by an automated process. JMcC (talk) 11:48, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Rushford
Done it, more to follow Saga City (talk) 12:04, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Cogan House Covered Bridge
Thanks for the heads up - I will fix the references in the next hour or so. Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 13:13, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: Cherry Creek (California)
It probably means that they are only accessible by foot, or need some kind of permit to access, or something. a backpacker in this case is someone who walks through the wilderness and stays at least one night there, carrying only a backpack for supplies. I've just been disambiguating many links about that in the last few hours ... I didn't know about the above meaning of "backpacker" until today, because it's never used in Australia. Graham 87 13:34, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

A reply...
awaits you on my talk page. Cheers, Hertz1888 (talk) 03:31, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

People mover
Huh? I didn't write the History section &mdash; in fact, my edits to the article have largely been limited to tweaks to the list of APMs. Jpatokal (talk) 03:56, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Pic of Djabugay people
G'day .. received your inquiry!

You may have noted that I'm still in process of expanding this article .. but yes .. I have two early pics of Djabugay people that I believe to be public domain .. on of people from the 1930's painted up for a corroborree, one from turn of the century taken from a camp ..

Do you have, or were you offering to upload more contemp. pic?

Bruceanthro (talk) 04:31, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Oilton, Texas
That line looks like it was quoted from The Handbook of Texas Online here. Most everything in smaller Texas articles is quoted from there. 25or6to4 (talk) 10:37, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Area of three types
You are correct in presuming that lakes, ponds, etc. constitute the water area of the town. I've never been to Oneida myself, but I know that this is the way in which the Census Bureau reports data for the community. Nyttend (talk) 12:07, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Timeline of musical events
Excuse me? I'm simply moving erroneously placed musical milestones out of Visual art milestones, if you have any objections to anything in the Timeline of musical events article then delete them......Modernist (talk) 12:33, 15 May 2008 (UTC)‎

"What will be the international rank of the Royal New Zealand Air Force in terms of strength?"
Um, sorry I don't think I understand your question. Context please?

Measured how - number of aircraft? But quality varies vastly. Number of serving personnel? Ditto. Cost? And to what end? I'm not sure that any simplistic list measurement is very useful. For example if you are interested in ranking for the purposes of air to air combat, then the RNZAF will be pathetic. On the other hand ability to do relief or search and rescue work would be rather higher...and are we talking now, or all time - as the RNZAF was once rather more important on the world stage than it is today. Winstonwolfe (talk) 15:19, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Ship breaking
Breaking means that the ship was broken up, as per the article Ship breaking. The phrase 'sold for breaking' is commonly encountered, but can be clarified a little for the less nautically inclined by saying 'sold for breaking up. I'll amend the article. Benea (talk) 16:32, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

History of antisemitism in the United States
I don't have time this morning to quibble with you over every section that you deleted. Most of it can be sourced. To me, "unsourced" is often a euphemism for "I don't believe it" or "this is POV". If something is inaccurate, then fix it rather than delete it. If it's POV, then make it NPOV by presenting the other side.

I do not have an "agenda" to push on this article although much of what is written on this topic does tend to be POV. If there are POV sections, then let us present the opposing point of view and source both sides.

Over the next week, I will be readding the text that you deleted with sources. I welcome your help on this article. However, I am confident that the topics that I have included deserve to be discussed. In some cases, there was excessive detail which I am more than willing to delete. However, I am also confident that article quality is improved by working on improving sections of imperfect text rather than deleting them.

--Richard (talk) 17:48, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

22nd Michigan
Thanks for the note! I went back to the Wiki article and copied the link to the source material on Wisner. 8th Ohio Volunteers (talk) 02:09, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: The Other Place
Ehhh. Maybe. It seems to be just barely within the guidelines. I'm not really familiar with that policy, so you may want to ask someone else who is more familiar with that sort of thing. Sorry I couldn't be of more help. J.d ela noy gabs adds 04:27, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Wood between the Worlds
Since it's from The Chronicles of Narnia, and if there's enough material to support an article, I'd say sure. Beyond that, notability is something I find really fuzzy. Yes, it does lack citations, but not because none exist; The source is the Narnia books. Someone just needs to put the citations in. I tagged the article accordingly. Nightscream (talk) 07:23, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Overland Track
Sorry, no - I didnt create them - I have enough problems with other articles - please dont remove them - the article is very poorly written - it needs a lot of work - I am trying to sort out of a lot other stubs that I have created. If you dont like them personally - de link them to grey type rather than link - best wishes- cheers SatuSuro 10:30, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Kings Canyon National Park
A national park has natural as well as human cultural features and aspects. No strong feeling either way. Consistency with other US National Park articles would be a starting point. Haven't checked that yet. Cheers. Bleakcomb (talk) 10:52, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Iranian Armenians
That was not my statement but it was written there and questioned whether it is true. As I saw that was sourced by Encyclopedia Orient. That Encyclopedia gives usually good and fair estimates. Now it writes that there are 500000 Iranian Armenians. Honestly I think there might be this much Armenian Iranians, but many do not live in Iran, but elsewhere in the world. It is here http://i-cias.com/e.o/iran_4.htm --Babakexorramdin (talk) 13:55, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Dave Grohl
What's your rational for moving Dave Grohl? He is not commonly known by his middle name, and there are no other famous Dave Grohls. WesleyDodds (talk) 08:15, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
 * It should be at Dave Grohl, per Wiki naming conventions. The dismabiguation created by adding "(musician)" is unnecessary, unless there are no other notable Dave Grohls. 08:20, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Nord Stream - answer
North Transgas was predecessor of the Nord Stream project. Technically its the same project and the main partner (Gazprom is same). However, legally Nord Stream is not the same project and as of today, North Transgas project company was terminated. North European Gas Pipeline is the name, which is officially changed to Nord Stream (by the company). It is not officially in use anymore, however, in media it is used quite commonly.Beagel (talk) 10:19, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Re Stanthorpe
It started out from Tin mining but no mine there now. They grow apples mainly I believe? A lot of old towns started as mining towns. Typically old gold mining towns. The gold eventually runs out but the towns survive on other things. I don't know a great deal about the town as I live in Brisbane.--Sting  Buzz Me...   11:49, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Before moving any more Australian town articles, please read Wikipedia:Naming conventions (places). I have moved Stanthorpe back to Stanthorpe, Queensland.  If you want the current naming convention for Australian towns changed, please raise the matter at WP:AWNB. -- Mattinbgn\talk 12:24, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Teddy Bear Scene
I didn't start an AFD because I didn't get a chance to research it yet. I try to only start an AFD after I've done a good faith effort to look it up. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 12:58, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Alcanar
I'm getting to it, bear with me. I'm struggling to find any non-Catalan sources, but I've found some. Note that it was translated from the Spanish Wikipedia, which has no sources, so that statement will probably be removed. Thanks,  weburiedoursecrets inthegarden  13:08, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Mt Warning
Only started to try an tidy this article up a little, having linked to it from the newly created Bundjalung article. The overlapping details of Aboriginal names, beliefs, and mythology all looks a bit messy and requires the kind of attention that I can't quite give it.

With regard to eruption dates .. given that the area is on the World Heritage list .. if the National Parks websites don't give this info, then it will most likely included on the Cwlth Department of Environment, Water, Heritage and Arts 'National Heritage Register'. Will be glad to fix this aspect of article if you wish .. but will have to wait until tonigh! Bruceanthro (talk) 00:03, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Canterbury tales image position
I sort of liked it at the start, as the mural is a better precis of the work than the woodcut. But if you prefer a different location for the mural, by all means move it. Eubulides (talk) 08:27, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Tuvalu
Sorry, I haven't got a clue. What I know about Tuvalu could fit on a napkin (which can almost be said of the country itself). Bastin 08:32, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Invergordon railway station
Apologies, the only edit I made to Invergordon railway station was to add a co-ordinate reference such that the GeoHack tool could bring up a map of the area if requested. If the redundant sentence is a problem I suggest removing it. JameiLei (talk) 09:04, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Crank (village)
Feel free to. I am currently cleaning up the garbage bin of short articles... :-) Carlossuarez46 (talk) 18:01, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Red Rock Island flora/fauna
No, sorry. I looked it up, and there was an advertising tag and an obviously advertising-like section that added nothing to the article.

I expect that the fauna would be sea lions and seagulls, since that's all I see there when I drive past. atomicthumbs‽ (talk) 18:24, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

52nd Foot
My regimental knowledge is pretty much during the Napoleonic wars (I'll have to research the other periods), but at that time they were equipped with muskets. Early on, there was some talk of providing rifles, but expected/perceived supply issues of rifled  weapons  caused them to stick with muskets. As you can imagine, this made for interesting skirmishing. The French were equipped with muskets also, so  fire-fights probably took place at distances of about 50 yds! If you had nerves of steel, you'd wait for your opposite number to come within 10 yds. I'll add some weaponry and fighting tactics to the article, eventaully. It's all a bit rough at the moment. Thanks for the interest, anyway! Gwinva (talk) 02:50, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Copyright status
It's unclear from the website hosting the image but the whole site carries a copyright notice by "Petr Kach" and it appears that his e-mail address is available on the site's homepage. I'd recommend that you contact Mr. Kach directly and inquire as to the source and status of the image. Hope this helps! - Dravecky (talk) 04:37, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
 * When you get permission for the image Please e-mail a copy of the email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org]. the image will then be tagged so that in the future others will be able to confirm that permission was recieved and it specifics. Gnangarra 04:54, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: Seaholme railway station, Melbourne
I don't know as I didn't add that word. It could be that the station opened, closed and reopened, which would then give it multiple opening dates. Since I don't have any references handy that discuss this station specifically, I couldn't say. I only made a couple formatting updates per WP:MOS and WP:TWP/MOS after seeing the AFD page. Slambo (Speak) 10:43, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Herbert Bareuther
Hi, Nice job of creating the Herbert Bareuther article. I tried verifying the claim that Bareuther is a legitimate recipient of the Knight's Cross. I am afraid to say that to my opinion he fails to meet the criteria. He is not listed in This work is the most complete KC related work I know of and is very precise when it comes to verifying the legal correctness of the Knight's Cross. Bareuther fails to be listed here so I have serious doubts that your reference that states he was awarded the Knight's Cross is correct.MisterBee1966 (talk) 13:25, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Walther-Peer Fellgiebel (2000), Die Träger des Ritterkreuzes des Eisernen Kreuzes 1939-1945. Podzun-Pallas. ISBN 3-7909-0284-5
 * done MisterBee1966 (talk) 16:43, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Good point. Per definition an ace is someone with more than 5 aerial victories. Probably not all of them deserve an article but I like playing with this list and compile as much information as possible. Someone else had started this page and I sort of took over and over time this is what it is. MisterBee1966 (talk) 17:38, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Got your back!
I was just over at the AIV noticeboard and saw what I firmly believe to be a spurious nomination of no less than yourself as a vandal. Looks as if you're the victim of a POV-pusher. You've always been there for me when I do NPP and I'll go to the mat for you on this matter if it blows out of proportion more than it already has. Hang tough. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 19:13, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Candacate
Hi, Otolemur. I think it's about the institution of the Kandakes, who were queens, queen consorts and queen mothers in the Kushite Empire. Unfortunately, the creator of the article seems to have been writing a lot of unsourced OR to push a POV on the Kandakes, Africa and Pan-Africanism e.g. on Kandake and Amanirenas. I'm removing some of this type of material from Candacate, but I'm not even sure it's a real or notable term. I've never heard of it and Google shows 8 results, with no non-WP references other than coypying from an old version of the WP article. It may warrant deletion. Tameamseo (talk) 19:27, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I think you're right there. As far as I can see, there actually isn't anything in it that isn't already covered at Kandake. Tameamseo (talk) 19:40, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Almoloya, Mexico State
I edited it a bit... check it out and see if it makes more sense to you now.Thelmadatter (talk) 20:42, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Edgeoya
Hi, I certainly understand your concerns about this article, but I haven't edited it, other than putting on the Svalbard template.

I would suspect "seldom visited" means that it gets an occasional scientific visit, or some Norwegian official checks that nothing untoward is happening. Or possibly cruise ships call there, but I doubt it.--MacRusgail (talk) 12:51, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Culpeper (Amtrak station)
Moving the services to the infobox generally helps railroad station articles. This way, if more info is added to the article, the services will remain at the top of the article. Murjax (talk) 17:24, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Kemano Dam/Kenney Dam
Haven't a clue. The key question is: Which name is correcet? Emeraude (talk) 18:30, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Reading the cited source, and looking at the map, the answer seems to be that Kemano is the name for the whole project, so the first dam is called Kemano 1, the second is Kemano 2 and so on. Nowhere in the source is there reference to a "Kemano dam" without a series number. So I guess that means the correct name for the first dam on the Kemano system is Kenney. Emeraude (talk) 18:36, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Refs for serial killer article
Okay, I'll see what I can dig up on it. At the moment I was just adding people who were already on Wikipedia, but you're right, I do need to find refs and stick them in. Asarelah (talk) 03:42, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

El Clavo
I have no idea about El Clavo or the definition of a town that may or may not apply to it. I just noticed that it didn't have any geographic coordinates so I looked them up on Google Earth and added them. --Canley (talk) 12:33, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Osadia‎
Thanks for the note on my talk page, I managed to find enough to confirm notability, but my Spanish is not up to the translation job required. I have now put the relevant tag on the article. --Richhoncho (talk) 09:07, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

hi otlemor
is not this edit un-justified? Advani was involved in a conspiracy to assassinate Jinnah. Does this not qualify for failed assassination attempt on Jinnah? He is "proclaimed offender or absconder in the failed conspiracy to assassinate Jinnah". Does that not make him a failed assassin.if not why he fleed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.96.165.164 (talk) 09:18, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

1000
1000 should be the divider in a town or village but in Africa evne settlements of 6000 may really be villages  ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦       $1,000,000? 17:26, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Karambit
I am not knowledgeable about the history of the karambit, so I can't add any "Origin and History" section. —Lowellian (reply) 08:00, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Welcome?
Dear Otolemur crassicaudatus, Thank you for welcoming me to Wikipedia, but I inform you that I have been contributing to Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons from the beginning of 2006. I am quite well informed about the conventions of Wikipedia, and if you have doubts of the veracity of any of my contributions, please, tell me and I won´t have any problem to tell the sources of any of my statements. It is, however, quite discouraging to be told to report the origin of a whole article. Furthermore, the article Isabelline Gothic is a stub, and the contents are quite universally known by anybody interested in architecture, without being an especialist. Please have a look to ANY book of general history of Spanish architecture, or even school text books and you will find reliable sources. an example could be: Historia de la arquitectura española, Fernando Chueca Goitia. If you don´t have acces to any book of this kind, you can also have a watch to this webpage. Yours, --Garcilaso (talk) 21:37, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Kurt Tanzer
Hi, soory for responding so late. I have him listed in
 * Spick, Mike. Luftwaffe Fighter Aces. Ivy Books, 1996. ISBN 0-8041-1696-2.

However Spick claims that he is credited with 143 aerial victories. I changed that in the article. MisterBee1966 (talk) 21:39, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Isabelline Gothic and Gótico Isabelino
Please, note that English Wikipedia conventions say that article names must be in English when possible. Please, could you explain this edition? --Garcilaso (talk) 21:49, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Please, use talk page. I have opened a debate there--Garcilaso (talk) 21:55, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

List of windmills in France
Every entry is referenced. Will add a short intro. Mjroots (talk) 11:51, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Caravanim
Thanks for the note. I just put up this article, and a minute later, you fixed it up! I hope to add more references soon. By the way, how did you change my link-references to the ref-list entries so quickly? Yoninah (talk) 14:20, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Political Parties..?
A (very) draft discussion on the policy on political parties has been started by me here - User:Doktorbuk/pp. If you can assist with this discussion, or know how to help me get this policy looked at, advanced, and accepted by the larger Wiki community, please let me know. Many thanks doktorb wordsdeeds 19:08, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

BMJ (British Medical Journal)
Glancing over the site, I'd give an emphatic "yes" to it being a WP:RS. The article you asked about is heavily footnoted and written by a Professor of the history of science. The site is for the British Medical Journal as they say here. I'd say it's about as good as it gets for a reliable source. So go to town with it. Cheers, Pigman ☿ 04:25, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Shag Rock
Per this, this is for you. Hesperian 14:12, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: Question
Yeah, it sounds like a copyvio to me. Derivative works, as far removed as they may be from the original text, were based on the original text and as such should cite the original source. I hope that answers your question. If not, let me know. Cheers. --MZMcBride (talk) 18:08, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm not really very good at determining copyrights. Perhaps try User:east718 or the Help desk? Cheers. --MZMcBride (talk) 18:28, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Re:
I'm not quite sure what I have to source: that the eastern half of Moldavia was included in the Russian Empire in 1812, or the fact Moldova has presidents?Xasha (talk) 18:15, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
 * No, reference are needed for the fact that the persons listed in the article were the rulers. The people may have their own article, but you must have to use reference in this article. Feel free to use the same references used in the individual articles.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 18:44, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: RS?
(copied over from my talk page:) My view, for what it's worth, is that a letter published in a journal such as the BMJ is a reliable source, so long as it is made clear when it is cited that it is indeed a letter. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 01:07, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

RE: 1989 Newcastle earthquake
I've got no images as I've never lived in or been to Newcastle and I don't know of anyone who may have photos, Sorry Bidgee (talk) 04:56, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Just thinking there isn't a map of the quake's location. I'll do some looking up and try and make a map based on facts available. Bidgee (talk) 05:00, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Tobacco
I'd agree that the copyvio issue looks okay, though I also have to admit that the length of the article made my eyes glaze over a bit (*silly grin*) Bearcat (talk) 06:50, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

O.c.: New message for you here. — Athaenara ✉  09:24, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Devonshire tea
http://www.bbc.co.uk/devon/news_features/2004/tavistock_cream_tea.shtml Meaty♠Weenies (talk) 13:45, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Also it's written about in the second paragraph of South West England. Meaty♠Weenies (talk) 13:59, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

RE: SR Lord Nelson class
Hello, I noticed you left a message on my talk page. I must admit I have difficulty understanding what you mean, as several articles have been moved about in this way attracting no reaction. The article needed to be re-titled to the correct version. Cheers, --Bulleid Pacific (talk) 13:50, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Anti-tobacco movement in Nazi Germany
Um, could you tell me exactly which bit you mean? Thanks, Cplakidas (talk) 17:52, 1 June 2008 (UTC)


 * If you mean the sentence "The anti-tobacco movement was influenced by the ideological concept of racial hygiene and bodily purity", which was moved up, nothing in it needs to be cited directly. The fact that ideological concepts were at work, and that these concepts concerned racial hygiene etc is supported by the subsequent sentences and their citations. I just moved it because, as a ageneral statement, it should precede the specific examples. Cplakidas (talk) 17:56, 1 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Very nice article overall, but it leaves me with two points I'm not sure about: 1) was the decline of the use of cigarettes during 1939-1945 the result of Nazi policies, or because there was a war going on, which naturally meant lower consumption of luxury goods? 2) I'm not sure that the statement "tobacco health research is silenced in Germany today" is accurate. Generally, European states have adopted a sometimes extreme anti-smoking stance of late. This statement should either be toned down, or, if indeed accurate, supported by a few more citations. Otherwise, good job! Cheers, Cplakidas (talk) 18:13, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

re DM
Thanks, but I can't be bothered with warring over such rubbish - I am a Brit, and our bunch of racist arseholes have entirely different names (and none of them were ever brave enough to lynch anyone). LessHeard vanU (talk) 12:35, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Posten (Sweden)
Please could you tell me how a poor quality picture of the back of a postman on a bike waving at the photographer helps to illustrate Sweden's national postal service? I really, honestly and truly do believe that this picture is unhelpful - in what way is it "terribly relevant"? Thanks, Pince Nez (talk) 12:21, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I cannot understand how the image is "unhelpful"? No matter how the image quality is, the picture shows a postman of Sweden and gives the reader a view of an average Swedish postmen.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 14:14, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * It is unhelpful because, as explained, it does not illustrate Sweden's national postal service. It would perhaps be suitable for illustrating the article Average Swedish postmen, but I can't imagine that such a topic would be worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia. Pince Nez (talk) 14:26, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * An average Swedish postman is part of the Sweden's national postal service. Hence the image belongs to the article. If you disagree, try Third opinion.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 14:30, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Egersund
Err why me? I was just removing some rather unconstructive edits, also I am rather busy at the moment.-- Kero tan -Have a nice day :) 16:33, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Regarding Morro de São Paulo
It seems a good idea. The problem is that I don't have any information on the other villages. The article may not assert notability, but I guarantee you it is a famous place and travel site here in Brazil. A Tinharé article would contain much info on Morro de São Paulo, but few info on other villages. Victor Lopes (talk) 17:59, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Dayewalker...
He is a troll and impersonating a banned editor. Yet, he has inside connections at Wiki. Look at how he is assuming bad faith and vandalizing and not one block. Something is going on here, and it's more about people than content. I'd file a report at the ANI board if I were you, so he'll stop vandalizing the Jefferson Memorial page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.31.32.222 (talk) 18:03, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi there
Hi Otolemur, Could you provide some clarity to the increasingly random discussion at Talk:Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi about the name change? Regards, Fowler&amp;fowler  «Talk»  23:59, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Soviet Navy
Why are you asking? Buckshot06(prof) 07:40, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
 * No worries. Go to the external links at the bottom of Soviet Navy, and follow the link to the GlobalSecurity.org site. Read carefully through the pages about the Soviet Navy and the U.S. Navy - there are lots of details. The bar on the right of the page from the main navy articles usually has a ship list. If you have further questions after that, by all means, come back and ask me. Buckshot06(prof) 07:47, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
 * To be slightly more precise, http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/ship.htm, and http://informationdissemination.blogspot.com/2008/03/chinese-submarines-vs-soviet-submarines.html. Sorry I was a little short with you. I just wondered why you hadn't done some google searching first. Buckshot06(prof) 07:57, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Re: Beaufort Island
Hi Otolemur crassicaudatus. At least one university has set up instruments on the island to collect data in recent years; more groups may have also done so. As far as I know, the island is never inhabitated. I'll add something about researchers surveying the island to the article. Bláthnaid 20:35, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Hanover
Which edit? Most of what I have been writing has been re-written by me from the German Wiki artical on Hanover. I presume they have sources. Do you see a problem or error? I'm not perfect. Cheers  -- Rob  NS  20:36, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Date?
Looks to have been posted to that website on 2007-01-03. Cheers. -- Longhair\talk 04:35, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Anti-tobacco movement in Nazi Germany

 * Nice job with the article! I had never heard about this before, so I was surprised to see how Nazi Germany facilitated smoking research. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 21:47, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Userpage
Thank you for the kind words. I know my userpage essay will not magically change wikipedia, but it is always nice to find someone who agrees with my position. Indrian (talk) 16:43, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

The Hindu
Watchlisted in case the problem recurs. -- Relata refero (disp.) 23:15, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Cuba-Venezuela relations
Hello Otolemur crassicaudatus! I think the article Cuba-Venezuela relations‎ is very good. You significantly expanded the article. Good job! Regards, Masterpiece2000   ( talk ) 04:12, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

ZNet
Appears to be an OK source. Note that part of the site (not the article you cited) is blogs; I wouldn't use stuff from that part. NawlinWiki (talk) 11:40, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

re:Image
I am not really an expert on pictures, but I don't think the picture in question is fair use, as it is owned by the BBC. Try contacting another editor for help with pictures, or someone at commons.--Thomas.macmillan (talk) 13:26, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Mangoteen
This article did not have AfD template listed on it, so I went ahead and put it on there. I know that Twinkle does tend to goof on these from time to time. Cheers!  TN ‑ X - Man  11:30, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Re: Borana people
The article mentions they are mainly nomadic, but I don't know anything more specific than that. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 19:09, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Yepii
I told Xiaphias yesterday about this article which he tried to speedy on this second article by User Yepii here more than 2 months ago but its still online at Wikipedia. Its the Yepii Party. Here is my comments on it: I checked the online 'reference' for the Yepii party and its just a blog site. It looks like a fringe party when the site says: "College loan officers are terrorists. Those who practice job discrimination are terrorists. Construction workers who wolf whistle at women are terrorists. This is where the real war [on terrorism] must be fought." Not exactly very inviting. I did a google check on its name and came across this result here I would say its likely WP:FRINGE and not notable. The fact that the author of the article has the name yepii hints at a SPAM. Regards, Artene50 (talk) 23:58, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Re:Help
Despite having been on Wikipedia for about a year and a half, I have never uploaded images and have absolutely no idea how to do so or anything about it. Sorry. Try asking someone else. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 16:47, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Uploading images
I can't really say what the problem is - the description of the problem is too vague. However, I note that the image is coming form another website, so it begs this question: how will the image improve the encyclopedia, and under which provisions of the non-free images policy can it be used? —C.Fred (talk) 16:58, 13 June 2008 (UTC)


 * No clue, and I don't have time to look further into it right now. Though it looks like you've got good rationale (plus if it is a Nazi Germany image, there may be a kicker for invalidation of the copyright). Sorry I can't be of more help. —C.Fred (talk) 17:02, 13 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I've no idea why you're getting an error message. -- R OGER D AVIES  talk 17:29, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Re:Formatting Userboxes

 * It looks good as it is now. I wouldn't mess with it.  Shapiros10 Wuz Here    20:46, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't know. That's just the way they were when i put them there.  Shapiros10 Wuz Here    20:50, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Burkina
Hi can you ensure you write the country into the infobox, cheers  ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦       $1,000,000? 16:27, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Ah I think we need to change it to south-west rather than south-east. Don't worry, I can adjust the ones we've already done. ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦      $1,000,000? 16:41, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Noah's Ark
And also I made a mistake - Bailey is not a Creationist, he's a very respectable mainstream scholar. PiCo (talk) 14:55, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Names
Hello and sorry for delay. I think the format with English translation in parentheses is correct. The second one may slightly confuse readers. If you use the German name as the default it will be clear the name was German. - Darwinek (talk) 12:41, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Political violence in Spain since 1975
Hi Otolemur, I don't quite understand why you have nominated for deletion the article I created. Should you not have messaged me beforehand with you objections to the article?

Regards

Damam --Damam2008 (talk) 19:07, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Wiki frustration
Mate, you have a heavy dose of Wiki-depression on your editor's page statements. Lighten up - I always compare Wikipedia like having a really large circle of friends, where everybody has some specialty that he likes talking about and is more or less knowledgable on. With articles, like with your friends, you have to constantly make decisions whether or not to trust what they are saying, based on what they said before and whether it helped/was correct. In case of Wikipedia, context - is the article well-written in style and grammar, does it have lots of references - are your main clues there. If you REALLY, REALLY need 'truth', you can (hopefully, if its a good article) go straight to the references and external links. Wikipedia is a clearing-house, a first stop if you are researching something (or the only stop, if you were simply curious, and no harm done).

I'm a horrible perfectionist too, and I sometimes ache under the knowledge that it won't ever be perfect (see my talk page infobox) but its fun AND useful. Someone said that a little knowledge is a dangerous thing. No knowledge is even worse.Ingolfson (talk) 09:42, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Anti-tobacco movement in Nazi Germany review
Just to let you know that I will be away from 25th June for a week. I will take a look before that, or quickly upon my return. If you have problems with that please let me know. Thanks for the work you have put into the article. Edmund Patrick – confer 17:34, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Voltairianism
Hi Galago,

I quite agree, Voltairianism is a separate concept from Voltaire. I created the redirect because there is currently no article on Voltairianism, and as Voltairianism is defined as "the doctrines of Voltaire, marked mainly by religious skepticism", redirecting to Voltaire seemed to make the most sense. If you feel that you can develop it into an article, by all means feel free to do so.

Neelix (talk) 22:27, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Image done
Done. Put it in an article for you, feel free to move it. — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 00:17, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

re:Reasons behind Axis defeat
Hi, Otolemur. Article talk pages aren't really the place to ask general questions about the topic itself, they're for discussions related to improving the article. So, I'll try to answer your question here. The most important blunder was attacking the USSR before having subdued Britain, thus ensuing a 2-front war. Then, on an operational level, the fiasco at Stalingrad, and the attack at Kursk were two of Hitler's worst mistakes against the Soviets, and coupled with his insistence to hold every inch of ground and to never retreat, it spelled disaster. Had Hitler allowed his generals to operate independently, to conduct local withdrawals to shorten the lines, withdraw and then immediately counterattack (2nd Kharkov is a successful example of that tactic) etc., the war may have ended differently. Also, Hitler's constant meddling with arms production greatly hindered the German war industry (making too many different types of vehicles, which inhibited streamlining and mass production). There were also problems with Hitler's handling of the war in North Africa (i.e., not finishing off Malta when he had the chance, not ensuring Rommel had adequate supplies and forces, etc.), but these are of lesser importance than the Eastern Front. Lastly, declaring war on the United States was a blunder as well, because Roosevelt had no intention of going to war with Germany prior to that declaration. I hope that answers your questions. Regards, Parsecboy (talk) 11:56, 23 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Oh, another thing I forgot to mention earlier; Hitler also forbade the construction of any secondary or tertiary defensive lines, because he thought it would encourage commanders to retreat prematurely if they knew they had prepared positions behind their main lines. This of course had severe ramifications when the Soviets inevitably did break the main German defenses, and the rear area was essentially open for exploitation. Regards, Parsecboy (talk) 16:29, 23 June 2008 (UTC)


 * I would say that it's probably questionable whether it would've had a major effect or not. The Blitz had no real effect on the outcome of the war, (which would lead one to believe that a rocket bombardment of British cities wouldn't either) and the V-2s weren't "smart" enough to be used to attack specific military targets (which would more or less preclude them from being used to bombard British airbases, etc.) It would've been more productive to pursue jet fighters that were capable of outfighting Allied escorts (oh yes, another Hitler blunder, he insisted that the early Me-262s be designed as attack aircraft, which delayed their employment as interceptors) instead of Hitler's "toys".
 * Now, if Germany had seriously sought to develope a nuclear bomb, and was able to engineer it enough to fit into a V-2 rocket (a tremendous task indeed), it then could have had an extremely dramatic effect on the war. Parsecboy (talk) 16:52, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

From Avocet57:

To further address this topic, my lectures always include at the very, very least, 3 major factors as major contributors to the failed effort of the axis. It must be pointed out that all too often the word "Axis" is unfortunately synonomous with "Germany". That being said, the 3 major factors below are indeed affixed to the German Reich - understanding that in a conflict so far reaching and complez, the notion of wining/losing, succeeding/failing, etc. are broad topics easily becoming topics for discussion and debate.

As provided above, Hitler's strategic and tactical errors resultant from establishing large active combat fronts both in the East and the West were certainly one of the major blunders. Many works on strategy, tactics and historical treatises support this, both before and after the event.

As I travel the time lines for this conflict, the other 2 major problems were; 2) Hitler's failure to allow the design and implementation of long range bombers for the Luftwaffe. Superficially, the obvious drawbacks here are also well documented and emphasized in fact and in deed by the success of the British and American bombing campaigns where long range bombers were central in winning the fight for continental Europe.  Finally, 3) ... Hitler's refusal to allow his Naval Admiral - Doenitz (specifically)  - to augment and intensify the U-Boat (Submariners) strategies in North Atlantic, especially during the hey-day of the Lend/Lease implementations as the wartime productions for the allies grew.

It is my opinion that should either of these 3 errors not taken place, an Axis victory in Europe is a considerable possibility. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Avocet57 (talk • contribs) 15:33, 31 July 2008 (UTC) --Avocet57 (talk) 15:41, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Re:Hindu-German Conspiracy
See Hindu-German Conspiracy which should explain this. It is referred to as Indo-German conspiracy in some historical works, especially those written by Indian historians. Hindu-German conspiracy is more an American term, especially used upto 1950s, because Hindu (or Hindoo) at the time was a term to describe all Indians, and the Annie Larsen fiasco, the first of the major plots to ship arms to India, was reported in American media as the Hindu-German conspiracy at the time (the trial was called Hindu-German Conspiracy Trial). Indian historians use Indo-German conspiracy to trace the conspiracy from the European arm (which preceded and linked into the Ghadar episode in America) to the plans that the Indians had to recieve the very arms that were impounded from the Annie Larsen and the plans that they had to utillise the arms in India (The German plot).

I therefore broke the article up into subsections on similar lines. Hope this helps. rueben_lys (talk · contribs) 14:59, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Hkelkar's vandalism
Hi, Otolemur. Edits with a similar POV, incessant reverts in Cannibalism article where Hkelkar socks Habitualsurfer4 / Zubrahim had been active. This user is still making new socks and continually vandalized pages. He is unstoppable.

Suspected socks: Wheelsthem, Beeskneestrees, Twiceshook2, Teamsofmany, Livedanddied, Wwethepowerisback, Waterstop, 70.112.72.77

Trasman (talk) 09:46, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Re: Daily Mail/Durga Vahini
Hi Otolemur crassicaudatus,

I don't know the Pakistan Daily Mail, but I would assume that it would probably be a reliable source. I'd be careful using articles like the one you mention, though, as it does not primarily deal with Durga Vahini - it's a more general article with a small section on them. As such it's probably safe to use it to expand the article, thougyh it wwould be far better to try to find an article dealing mainly with Durga Vahini. I'd also be very careful given that a Pakistani newspaper might not be totally unbiased about a predominantly Indian organisation (or vice versa!) Grutness...wha?  11:35, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism
Thanks for reverting the vandalism at Prakash Karat. The articles on Karat, Brinda Karat and Ardhendu Bhushan Bardhan‎ are repeatedly vandalised by anon ip accounts, probably the same guy. The vandalism is quite persisent over time. Thanks for keeping an eye out. --Soman (talk) 12:37, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for linking the relevant policy on the Acharya S AFD. I do think she meets the policy guidelines for establishing notability. National Radio shows count. Book reviews count. Popular documentaries count. ^^James^^ (talk) 10:59, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Re Date
...103? I'm assuming it should read 2003, but that's a total guess. It says '103' in the page source code too, so it's not a browser error (just a typo I suppose). EyeSerene talk 18:29, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Hkelkar
Suspected socks: Beeskneestrees, Libran82 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Trasman (talk • contribs) 21:52, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The first one is already blocked, and the second had all of its edits reverted anyways. Dance With The Devil (talk) 21:59, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

River conversationist?
Why do you ask? I'm confused; did I do something to anger you? Leonard( Bloom ) 17:36, 1 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Oh. Well, I'm assuming that it's has to do with an environmentalist, specifically rivers. As for the article: it needs formatting, but for the brief time I looked at it, I didn't see anything that blared "CSD". Leonard( Bloom ) 19:30, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Pleasant Hill, Oregon
Feel free to change it; I don't own the article. ;) I started the article and made the location map for it, but I certainly don't own it and won't prevent any reasonable edits to it. Bumm13 (talk) 19:50, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Gikondo
Indeed it is. I had just gone for a milk and biscuit break. I'll see what I can do. ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦      $1,000,000? 23:05, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Wormshill
Hi, spotted your comment on UU's talk page and thought I'd pre-empt your subsequent comment at Wormshill. Hopefully I have addressed your concern as regards transport within the village, please let me know what you think. Cheers Dick G (talk) 08:26, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

re:Agriculture in Mexico
I don't really know mate, but I think it might be corn, do you have any particular interest on the agriculture of Mexico? Supaman89 (talk) 02:14, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: Rouvroy-Ripont
Hello. Please see the previous version: the coordinate links are overlapping each other. The infobox template Template:French commune already contains the template coord. Best regards, Korg (talk) 04:42, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: Act of War: High Treason
Sure. It has very few reviews is that ok?. --SkyWalker (talk) 05:03, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Done. I have added only 3 link and metacritic. --SkyWalker (talk) 05:22, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Hkelkar??
Does this guy look like Hkelkar? He certainly got the patented driveby revert down pat. Dance With The Devil (talk) 05:42, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

CPP
Hi. could you keep an eye on Communist Party of Pakistan. Its repeatedly filled with promotional coi spam. --Soman (talk) 11:54, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Template:Cite book
I'm not sure I understand your question -- you mean, what does it do differently now? Or did it break in some way I missed?--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 13:56, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see. I don't understand template syntax well enough to explain it: I can sort-of-see what it does, but I don't know why it would work here but not elsewhere.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 14:01, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Wrong pic
Oops! --KnowledgeHegemonyPart2 14:47, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Template:Talkheader
Please see Template:Talkheader. In most circumstances it is unnecessary if the talk page is empty. Regards, Korg (talk) 16:35, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
 * There are no absolute rules, just recommendations. The point is to add it when needed, so if the talk page has only project tags and no activity, it would be rather unnecessary. However, it may be useful in particular circumstances, no matter the talk page content, for example if the article documents a current event and the talk page attracts new contributors. You may want to read further information in the talk page and its archives. Regards, Korg (talk) 22:56, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Vatican Radio
I'd consider it a reliable source. Generally, government broadcasting services would be considered reliable. We don't often think of the Vatican as a government but it is. --WoohookittyWoohoo! 11:39, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

hello
Hello! :) I thought you might be interested in this. Check it out and add your name under "Participants" if your interested. Have a nice day and happy editing! --Grrrlriot (talk) 00:38, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Re:SACI-2
I must have missed the red links, thanks for pointing that out. DiverseMentality (Discuss it) 19:31, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for fixing La Fox, Illinois. I'm still seeing what's appropriate and not here. The tutorial said to just go ahead a do, and learn as you go, since nothing is breakable. -Gych (talk) 19:32, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Battle of Busan (1592)
Hi, I'm just trying to clean up the articles, rather than expand them at the moment (at least ones outside of my expertise). But feel free to be bold and work on the article yourself! Vincent Valentine 20:30, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Jamaica Hope
Don't think I'll be able to find one that's free, but if you follow the links there's plenty of pictures. Lampman  Talk to me! 09:16, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

USAAF
I guess I don't quite follow. Give me an idea of what you mean on my talk page. Are you referring to the opening summary or something else? Thanx.--Reedmalloy (talk) 23:05, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Finished Whiteway, Bath
I have completed the article Whiteway, Bath and I am hoping it won't be deleted.

The main aim is to give people living in this area something that appears in the listings when they enter "Whiteway" into Google.

Please could the article appear as one of the choices when people type "Whiteway" into Wikipedia, along with the other contexts such as "Whiteway Colony", "Dean Whiteway" etc?

Proud of Twerton (talk) 10:53, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

whaling picture
Hi Ot (if I can shorten your name!)

Yeah, the thing is there was a picture there originally about that large, but I deleted it and the page looked a little empty, so I just blew that one up.

Cheers Jonathanmills (talk) 20:13, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Re:Huggle
You need rollback, and a decent internet connection, and you need to be on the Huggle whitelist. As it stands, you're on the whitelist, but I don't know if you have rollback. Sceptre (talk) 13:00, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, you'll be able to use it, then. Sceptre (talk) 13:03, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Sheikh Ahmad Jami
Hi.I wanted to create an article as soon as possible.thanks anyway.Bbadree (talk) 14:53, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: Huggle
Go to System > Options. Click on "Queue". There should be a check box there that you can use. If you have any problems, feel free to ask me again. Cheers! J.delanoy gabs adds 17:02, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: Huckworthy
Settlements don't have a size test, and this place apparently has non-trivial book coverage according to a Google Books search. The content appears to be verifiable, but I'm sourcing it from scratch. • Gene93k (talk) 17:25, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

re: Robert Harron
Yes, I'll have a look at it!  Lugnuts  (talk) 13:36, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

?
Hi. Could you have a look at Asmaa Abdol-Hamid? a user is repeatedly adding material on her family as a form of political mudslinging through guilt by association. --Soman (talk) 14:37, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * thanks, --Soman (talk) 15:15, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

It is absolutely critical you read this now!

 * In response to your comment on my user talk page - it's just a term, referring to the idea that the notable reception is usually from critics, ie. reviewers. It is not referring to the importance of the comments of those folk, or their importance in the whole of the article. Hope that helps. - Arcayne   (cast a spell)  23:25, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Robert Carter Pitman
Probably not. I hadn't noticed the tag, and will do some more cleanup. Alansohn (talk) 02:55, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

BOT or NO BOT
You asked me how to tell if an I/P vandal is a bot. If you mean a Wikipedia bot, then those always seem to have "BOT" in the name, so an anon I/P isn't going to be a Wikipedia bot. However, there is a formal way to check, by going here:. Enter the name to check on the top line and pick "Bots" on the bottom line, then pick the "Go" button. StuRat (talk) 03:59, 14 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Now, as for non-Wikipedia bots, that's not as clear cut. I'd go to the contribution list for that I/P and see if it's making dozens of edits per minute, that would tell you it's a bot.  Or, alternatively, it may do something repeatedly after a given time increment.  Are all the changes of the same type, like blanking pages or inserting the same chunk of text ?  Then it's likely a bot.  If the changes are different, then it's probably not a bot. StuRat (talk) 04:09, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Personal attacks
I usually just let them go, but this is getting out of hand. Can you at least look into this matter again? Thanks. Sorry for the extra work.--Cberlet (talk) 02:28, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Anti-tobacco movement in Nazi Germany
I am impressed by your contribution to the above mentioned article. However, this seems to rely extensively on the work by Proctor, which is indeed a good source. However, recent work throws new light on the issue, and this might as well be reflected in the article. Two references are particularly notable:


 * E. Bachinger, M. McKee, Tobacco policies in Austria during the Third Reich, INT J TUBERC LUNG DIS 11(9):1033–1037
 * Bachinger E, et al. Tobacco policies in Nazi Germany: Not as simple as it seems. Public Health (2007), doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2007.08.005

--Dessources (talk) 18:38, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I will try to update the article whenever new information is available. Out of the two sources,  Tobacco policies in Austria during the Third Reich is mentioned in the Further reading section.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 18:44, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Sunderland Echo
Just looking back to yesterday's edits and noticed you had been helping with the de-linking of this article... Thankyou, much appreciated!--<em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:black"> Seahamlass  20:26, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Re:Question

 * No, the user must first reply to your email for you to be able to view their email address. On the other hand, if you email another user, your email address is visible to the other user without reply. This is for privacy and security more than anything.
 * Technically you do not need email enabled to become an administrator, but it is highly reccomended. If you don't want to reveal your personal email address, I'd suggest creating a Wikipedia-specific address on Hotmail or Gmail.

I hope this has answered your questions! For more information, you may wish to read this page. Feel free to contact me again if you need more help! Malinaccier (talk) 00:58, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Cites
I could figure this out easier if you gave me a number for the cite you are having a problem with. Gatoclass (talk) 04:57, 22 July 2008 (UTC)


 * That's weird, cite 5 works perfectly for me. Gatoclass (talk) 05:06, 22 July 2008 (UTC)


 * No, I misunderstood what you said. What you mean is that the link in cite five doesn't take you to the correct book reference. I am not actually familiar with this method of linking in any case, but I'll have a look at it to see if I can spot any obvious problem. Gatoclass (talk) 05:11, 22 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Hmm, that looks complicated. I'm not familiar with this kind of referencing, and I can't even figure out how the software finds the right ref in the first place, I'd have to read up on it first. Perhaps you should ask Borgqueen, she's more familiar with formal referencing than I am. Gatoclass (talk) 05:20, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Re:Problem
I'm not sure that I see what the problem is. The links you provided work fine for me with the only exception being that they take me to the "Notes" section of the article and not the "References" section. But then, that's what they should do. So I don't see what's wrong. Dismas |(talk) 05:35, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Your notes seem to work perfectly fine to me. --BorgQueen (talk) 05:38, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh ok, I got what you mean. Hang on, I will look into it. --BorgQueen (talk) 05:41, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I suppose the error is caused by having the names of five authors - try to remove one or two and try again. In addition, I find the harvard reference format you are using unnecessarily complex. Please have a look at Cubeb and see the difference. --BorgQueen (talk) 05:49, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Tried that and it still didn't seem to work. One of those weird Wiki problems.
 * I had a similar sort of problem like this a while back. If I linked to a commons image by typing the name of the image into an image string, it simply wouldn't display the image, it would only recognize the image if I did a copy-and-paste from the commons image name itself, even though the two strings were as far as I could tell absolutely identical. And this didn't happen with just one image, but with dozens of them. Could I have been mistyping every image name? Highly unlikely. I'm still scratching my head over that one... Gatoclass (talk) 06:01, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * You mean .jpg and .JPG? Yes, it seems to be case-sensitive. I remember once I deleted a c-uploaded copy of yours and it became a red link... Then I saw you had uploaded it as .jpg, when it was actually .JPG. --BorgQueen (talk) 06:14, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Credible author
Hello. A credible authors' reference is being "overrided" by edit-warring. I recently tried to add to the telescope article but this editor seems to think that his opinion overrides a VERY credible author in Mr. Richard Powers. I've been blocked before for edit-warring recently, so I don't want this to be another incident on my record.

Anyway, the other editor seemed to have asked his friend-type editors to form a consensus, so I will do the same. The Islamic connection here is, Al-Haytham. He is FUNDAMENTAL to the telescope and the FATHER of optics. By definition, the summary can include him since the radio and electro-magnetic telescopes are derogatory to the average person looking at the article; I wanted to add it to the history section since it looked cleaner. Can you help your fellow InternetHero?? InternetHero (talk) 21:02, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Image problem
I fixed it. It was missing the "|thumb|" portion of the coding. It shows up now. However, the caption isn't very well worded, the grammar isn't great. I'd recommend rewording it. Useight (talk) 23:09, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * That's weird. I was looking at, trying to fix it, but I didn't change anything. Useight (talk) 23:25, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Proposal for standard infobox for History of [country] templates
Hi there! You're a member of WikiProject History, so I'm just informing you about a proposal I've made about standardizing History of [country] templates (like Template:History of France). The discussion is located at the talk page for WikiProject History—your comments and criticism are welcome. Thank you. Mr. Absurd (talk) 05:15, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Freedom Press
Actually, the disambiguation page and redirect are fine as they were; if someone follows a link to Freedom Press, it alerts them to the fact that there are two distinct entities with this name. The fact that one of them is now a redirect is largely immaterial; any links to the US Freedom Press should still be linked directly there rather than piped to David Steinman. Why? If at some future date, the someone writes enough about Freedom Press to warrant splitting it into its own article again, all of the links will already be valid and in place. Hope that makes some kind of sense! --Rlandmann (talk) 04:49, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Bogra
Thanks. I remove all the people that were red linked and/or unsourced as to their notability. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 08:53, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Pearl
Oh OK, I thought that since a pearl is an animal product, a taxobox might be useful. Sorry. Invertzoo (talk) 19:07, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

OK, I will read those carefully. Thank you thick-tailed eared lemur! Invertzoo (talk) 20:10, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Nonja
No I haven't located it yet. I did find a picture in Commons though. Sorry! Scanlan (talk) 01:37, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Re:Special:Contributions/Pencil pusher 006
Thanks for the heads-up anyway. ... disco spinster   talk  02:13, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

History of Montreal
I think natural history is more appropriately handled under articles like Geography of Quebec, Saint Lawrence Lowlands, Monteregian Hills, or Mount Royal. History pages are usually confined to human history. --soulscanner (talk) 04:49, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Re:Columbia Encyclopedia
To answer your question, yes. The Columbia Encyclopedia article list numerous places where the online version of the publication has been incorporated. So, while it is not exclusively an online encyclopedia, certain versions of it are published online.

Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh
Sister, do you owe me an explanation? --Vrite2me (talk) 06:03, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

To all members of the Anarchist Task Force - about improvement of the AI-Wiki-page
I have just joined the Anarchist Task Force, and I have had some problems with publishing of my Anarchist International Wikipedia page, see my sandbox http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Anna_Quist/Anarchist_International for the present version/proposal. This page needs improvements to reach Wiki-consensus, and this should be a somewhat collective project to avoid a "COI"-template. As I am new to editing here on Wikipedia I need help with the page, I hope for your cooperation with this improvement. As an introduction to this cooperation, feel free to read this note on my talk page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Anna_Quist#Message_to_all_anarchists_on_Wikipedia_-_Anarchy_is_cooperation_without_coercion.2Fdestruction.2Fdeletion_-_about_the_deletion_of_the_AI-Wiki-page_and_cooperation_to_achieve_an_updated_AI-page_with_general_Wiki-consent.

Any contribution, matter of fact criticism, to give input and advice, or even contribute to new sections, will be helpful, and is much appreciated. Please join in the project...

(Anna Quist (talk) 17:15, 29 July 2008 (UTC))

Re: Huggle/Edit summary
You can either click on the down-arrow located directly to the right of the red "revert without warning" button and select the bottom option in the drop-down menu or you can press "Y" to bring up the dialog box. Also, it will remember what you've typed during the current session, which is useful for common messages like "rm redlink" or "unsourced." Thingg <sup style="color:#33ff00;">&#8853; <sup style="color:#ff0033;">&#8855; 01:50, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Anti-tobacco movement in Nazi Germany
It was the names of the entry fields in the citation template. They need to be lowercase; the template is programmed to look for lowercased "year", "title" and "publisher", not capitalized "Year", "Title" or "Publisher". Hope that helps. Bearcat (talk) 01:56, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Mys
Mys means "Cape" in Russian, like in Mys Shmidta. Mohonu (talk) 06:49, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

"Chinese" porn
Hi. I gather that you uploaded this in the belief that it was Chinese. What made you think that, and just where does it come from? (The link that you provide is to a series of humdrum photos of somebody's family, etc.) -- Hoary (talk) 07:36, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
 * It's blazingly obvious to me that it's not Chinese but Japanese. (I don't expect you to believe me, but try asking at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject China and/or Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Japan.) &para; If it's a single mistake, fine. But what alarms me is the idea that you might have taken seriously other stuff written with complete ignorance by others at Flickr and elsewhere. &para; Anyway, you should have it removed from Commons before other credulous people recycle it and amplify the misunderstanding. -- Hoary (talk) 08:02, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
 * OK, fine. You might want to upload it with "japanese" rather than "chinese" in its title; if so, I'd also drop the "ancient" bit, because this (mild) example of shunga is almost certainly Edo period and thus would never be thought of as ancient (just pre-modern, collectible, and expensive). -- Hoary (talk) 08:25, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Joseph Pilates
Let's discuss the issue on Talk:Joseph Pilates. --Slashme (talk) 08:44, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism Tools
Ha, thanks, was going through a list that I found on ClosedMouth's userpage, I was using TW, I must not have noticed, I'll check the history next time.— <font color="Green">Dæ dαlus<font color="Green">Contribs /Improve 09:12, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

The rollback
Regarding this, as long as you remember that in future, you'll be fine. An occasional mistake or two with rollback won't lead to its removal: only continued misuse would be a concern. Best wishes. Acalamari 16:08, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

The Register
After a brief look over it, I'd say it's a pretty close call, but it'd be more reliable than most sources, however, it doesn't appear to be on the same tier as The New York Times or the Associated Press. So, I don't think it'd be a bad source to use, but there'd be better ones, if available. Some of those articles there, though, kind of ring a bell, I think I saw them at msn.com, which would be a better source. Useight (talk) 02:29, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Thankyou
Strictly speaking all the regency and province categories in Indonesia that I have created should have had explanatory sentences inside the main category page - so that there is no confusion as to what the categories are for - not yet though - many to go yet - thanks for the encouragement - cheers and best wishes SatuSuro 14:18, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Theory/fact
The fact of "evolution" is that organisms change over time, the "theory of evolution" explains why this happens. Objections are mostly to the evidence that this process occurs, so the title should refer to simply "evolution" see Evolution as theory and fact for a (lengthy) discussion of this distinction! :) Tim Vickers (talk) 15:52, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Chinandega
I'm not sure if the translation meter works automatically. I'm almost done anyway, so I'll be removing it. Thanks! --Polylerus (talk) 19:19, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

RE: User talk:Mistress Selina Kyle
Well, the page is a redirect, and the user is banned. Why you left it in the first place? Cheers, Face 11:04, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Cryptozoology
What's the problem with cryptozoology? You seem to be AfDing a series of articles on cryptids on the grounds that the creature may not exist. That's rather the point of the subject. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:22, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Nonsense. Have you actually read my rationale in the AfDs? I am not AfDing the articles on the ground it may not exist, I am AfDing the articles on the ground that these fails the general notability guidelines. I have no objection to keep an article which documents a hoax, but the hoax itself must be notable. Carefully read WP:RS and WP:N before asking any question.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 10:33, 6 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Ah yes, "Fails WP:N." (from Articles for deletion/Row (cryptozoology)). A clear nomination if ever there was. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:47, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Hi there. Appreciate the work you're doing on the cryptozoology articles. Regards, ClovisPt (talk) 10:32, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

re: AfD nomination of Lukwata
thanks for letting me know. last time an article of mine was nomenated (for speedy-delete that time) i was away from home and got back just in time to see that it had been deleted. once again i'm away from home, but i'll be able to work with you once i get back on saturday. thanks again for the notice. 12:59, 6 August 2008 (UTC)