User talk:Otterhawk

Proposed deletion of Ruined orgasm
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ruined orgasm, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * WP:OR at the best of times. Non-notable and with no assertion of notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ironholds (talk) 02:17, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Ruined orgasm
I have nominated Ruined orgasm, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Ruined orgasm. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Themfromspace (talk) 06:17, 6 March 2009 (UTC)