User talk:OttomanJackson/Archive1

Welcome and introduction
Hi, OttomanJackson. This is NOT some automated message...it's from a real person. You can talk to me right now. Welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed you've just joined, and wanted to give you a few tips to get you started. If you have any questions, please talk to us. The tips below should help you to get Best of luck!  Chzz  ►  01:03, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Stop
Stop recreating these song articles, as they are not notable and fail WP:NMUSIC.  Pyrrhus 16 ''' 23:02, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, just to back up the above editor. The relevant policy is WP:MUSIC - it says "Songs that have been ranked on national or significant music charts, that have won significant awards or honors or that have been performed independently by several notable artists, bands or groups are probably notable. (However) a separate article on a song is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album."  Thanks, Black Kite (t) (c) 01:04, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Notabilty
Notability is based on coverage in many, many reliable sources. Not on a handful and not on your original research or opinion. The images you added to the article were taken by Discogs off of google images and they have not credited the photographer, as it is clearly a photograph of the product and not just an album cover on its own. The images fail WP:FAIRUSE and are a copyright violation.  Pyrrhus 16 ''' 10:50, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

April 2010
Stop edit warring by restoring the images to the "Speechless" article, when several editors are opposed to them. Use the article talk page, where these issues can be discussed. Continue along this route and you may be blocked from editing for edit-warring.  Pyrrhus 16 ''' 21:55, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Conquests (Civilization III Scenarios)


A tag has been placed on Conquests (Civilization III Scenarios), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  Pyrrhus 16 ''' 22:00, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Re:
Your articles are redirect and nominated for deletion because they are not independently notable, meaning that they are not written about in many, many reliable, third party sources. I think you would benefit from using the this to create any future articles.  Pyrrhus 16 ''' 22:18, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Theodosia Throckmorton
I have nominated Theodosia Throckmorton, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Theodosia Throckmorton. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  Pyrrhus 16 ''' 22:28, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:MJ Speechless Disc.jpeg
Thank you for uploading File:MJ Speechless Disc.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 23:54, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 19:03, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of OttomanJackson
A tag has been placed on OttomanJackson, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, image description page, image talk page, mediawiki page, mediawiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.

If you can fix the redirect to point to a mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your reasoning on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  Pyrrhus 16 ''' 22:43, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MJ Speechless Cover.jpeg
 Thanks for uploading File:MJ Speechless Cover.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:37, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Regarding Rheims Faculty of Law
As there's no rush to accept submissions, you should always cleanup the article first. Right now there are several broken references, entire sections which must be removed, and poor sourcing.  fetch  comms  ☛ 23:10, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * In addition, a comment was left unaddressed, that it needed (and still needs) a copyedit. If you could assist in that, please do.  fetch  comms  ☛ 23:17, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

April 2010
Do not lie in edit summaries, as you did here. That edit does not constitute vandalism at all. Furthermore, use the article talk page to discuss issues and cease edit warring.  Pyrrhus 16 ''' 23:16, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Rosemary Anne.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Rosemary Anne.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  fetch  comms  ☛ 23:29, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MJ Speechless Back.jpeg
 Thanks for uploading File:MJ Speechless Back.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  fetch  comms  ☛ 23:30, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
mono 01:39, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. mono 01:40, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
 Hello,. You have new messages at Fetchcomms's talk page You can [ remove this notice] at any time by removing this template. (This notice was added 20:41, 19 April 2010 (UTC) by Fetchcomms)

Recreating Greg Heffley
Please do not re-create articles where there is consensus to redirect per an AfD discussion. This page: Articles for deletion/Greg Heffley established consensus against his notability, and your one opinion does not override consensus. Thank you and かんぱい！ Scapler (talk) 06:57, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Don't Walk Away (Michael Jackson song), you will be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. ''I'm sorry to have to use such a warning; I appreciate your efforts, however - considering all the other messages above, I really think that you need to read WP:FIRST, Image use policy and Help:Edit summary. To create an article that is not ready to go live, use WP:USERSPACEDRAFT. I will add some help about referencing, below. Please ask if you need help.''  Chzz  ►  07:24, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

{| class="wikitable collapsible collapsed" ! How references work

Simple references
These require two parts;


 * a)

Chzz is 98 years old.

He likes tea.


 * b) A section called "References" with the special code " ";

Named references
Chzz was born in 1837, in Footown.

Note that the second usage has a / (and no closing ref tag). This needs a reference section as above; please see user:chzz/demo/namedref to see the result.

Citation templates
You can put anything you like between, but using citation templates makes for a neat, consistent look;

Chzz has 37 Olympic medals.

Please see user:chzz/demo/citeref to see the result.

For more help and tips on that subject, see user:chzz/help/refs.
 * }

Proposed deletion of Theodosia Throckmorton


The article Theodosia Throckmorton has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable character

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~BLM (talk) 16:38, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''Do NOT recreate pages that you or others have created that have been recently deleted per consensus. I suggest you take the time to read some of the helpful links supplied above.  Pyrrhus 16 ' 16:54, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

April 2010
Please stop making disruptive edits by re-creating article's for un-notable Michael Jackson songs. If you continue to create article's for un-notable things, as well as undoing other editors edits that redirect the pages, then you will be blocked from editing. Crystal Clear x3 07:43, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Rosemary Anne.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Rosemary Anne.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  • ɔ   ʃ   →  23:30, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Somebody Else found it. Check the image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OttomanJackson (talk • contribs)
 * Somebody else found what?  Pyrrhus 16 ''' 21:19, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * So is the same person as you?  Pyrrhus 16 ''' 21:26, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Do not alter my comments as you did here. Is this editor you or not?  Pyrrhus <font color="#FF0000">16 ''' 21:32, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Can you please answer the question for clarity?  Pyrrhus <font color="#FF0000">16 ''' 21:47, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * One of wikipedia's rules says don't ask for personal information. Please cease your disturbance, as I will not say whether or not 24.15.54.202 is me and you are annoying me with your constant pestering for this info OttomanJackson (talk) 22:22, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
 * It would be so much easier for everybody if you were as pernickety about Wikpedia's other rules and guidelines, particularly those regarding notability and image copyright. In my opinion and from my observations, 24.15.54.202 clearly is you. I suggest you stop using it as a sockpuppet in disagreements, as you may be blocked for sockpuppeteering.  Pyrrhus <font color="#FF0000">16 ''' 10:45, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * What is your so-called "proof" OttomanJackson (talk) 22:21, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The duck test suggests that you are the same person, as you have a very similar pattern of edits. This edit backs up the suspicion, as well as this one to the image that is up for deletion that you created. Funny how an IP with a similar pattern of edits as you was able to stumble upon the image on Wikipedia and find the source of the photograph as well. If you are going to use your IP, I suggest that you not use it abusively as a means of escalating edit wars amongst other contributors opposed to your actions, as these type of people always get found out.  Pyrrhus <font color="#FF0000">16 ''' 22:58, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Re: ???
No, you cannot recreate the deleted page because other editors discussed the matter and stated that it should be deleted outright, with no redirect. The song articles that you create fail WP:NSONGS, so I suggest you stop and instead work on the thousands of song articles that already exist and that need improvement.  Pyrrhus <font color="#FF0000">16 ''' 21:28, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:$5000bill OttomanJackson.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:$5000bill OttomanJackson.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Pyrrhus <font color="#FF0000">16 ''' 10:55, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Last warning
This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  Pyrrhus <font color="#FF0000">16 ''' 01:14, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

We've had enough
(Track 13, disc 4, The Ultimate Collection) Michael Jackson fans buy this song on iTunes [THIS SONG ONLY NOT THE FULL ALBUM] on June 25 ,2010 so it gets to #1 on the billboards. It is one of his most powerful songs and easily deserves the moment. OttomanJackson (talk)

Orphaned non-free image File:$5000bill OttomanJackson.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:$5000bill OttomanJackson.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:37, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

AN/I
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Tarc (talk) 02:38, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Pointy behavior
Regarding your nominations of Lucy in the Sky With Diamonds and Revolution 9 for deletion, please take a look at WP:POINT. Doing something disruptive to make a point is highly discouraged on Wikipedia -- please don't do it again, you're likely to be blocked. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:55, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Notable and non-notable songs
Please read WP:MUSIC - it is quite clear. "Most songs do not rise to notability for an independent article and should redirect to another relevant article, such as for the songwriter, a prominent album or for the artist who prominently performed the song ... a separate article on a song is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article." This is why there is an article for Revolution 9 - look at the detail there - and why there isn't for every single Michael Jackson song ever (or even every Beatles song ever!) - there simply aren't the reliable in-depth sources out there to create enough for a separate article for each one. All notable Michael Jackson songs have an article already. As the user above said, please don't disrupt Wikipedia to prove a point again - you will almost certainly be blocked. Black Kite (t) (c) 06:19, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

ANI
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.  Pyrrhus <font color="#FF0000">16 ''' 19:10, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Any further disruptive or pointy editing will earn you a block. You have been pointed to the relevant policies regarding which songs merit their own articles and which ones do not. Please review these policies closely.  caknuck <sub style="color:black;">°  needs to be running more often  19:40, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I deleted Michael Jackson is awesome! as redirects have to be plausible search terms. No one will type that looking for the page on Jackson. More to the point, you are still failing to tone down your editing as you have been asked to countless times now. Stop, or get blocked. SGGH ping! 21:33, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 1 week, for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.  caknuck <sub style="color:black;">°  needs to be running more often  22:30, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

User talk:166.137.140.101
I suspect to be you, I have extended your block. SGGH ping! 21:25, 10 May 2010 (UTC) I have nothing to do with them. Please reconsider the Money (Michael Jackson song) AfD with this knowledge. Thanks OttomanJackson 23:02, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I suspect that the two Illinois-based IPs on the AfD are related, too. Black Kite (t) (c) 18:21, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Series1996$100usnote.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Series1996$100usnote.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. feydey (talk) 08:46, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits to Talk:2010 Stanley Cup Finals
Please do not use talk pages such as Talk:2010 Stanley Cup Finals for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Threads such as "I want my [favorite sports team] to win" or "GO [my favorite team]!" are inappropriate discussions and will be removed. Thanks. Zzyzx11 (talk) 14:38, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:49, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Speechless
Speechless was made a featured article on May 22, after discussions with many experienced reviewers on how exactly to word the article. Therefore, it is not helpful or acceptable to revert to a past version.  Pyrrhus <font color="#FF0000">16 ''' 21:54, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * It was promoted to FA class on May 22. It is unlikely that it will be on the main page in the near future. Some information was removed or reworded in the article because reviewers for FA felt that it was needed for a good quality article.  Pyrrhus <font color="#FF0000">16 ''' 22:06, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * There was too much information in the critical reception section of Speechless. Articles should be written in a summary style, meaning that not every fact has to be in an article. It is unlikely that Speechless will be on the main page soon because we have already had a few Michael Jackson-related articles appear on the main page in the past few months. Money was deleted by AFD discussion, so cannot be recreated.  Pyrrhus <font color="#FF0000">16 ''' 22:20, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Warning
Regarding this; I'd be very careful if I were you. And it is "pointlessly", not "pointlessley". I suggest that you just watch yourself and, perhaps for once, think before you type and press the save button.  Pyrrhus <font color="#FF0000">16 ''' 00:44, 14 June 2010 (UTC)